Cargando…

Assessment of the dental and skeletal effects of fan-type rapid maxillary expansion screw and Hyrax screw on craniofacial structures

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study was to assess the skeletal and dental effects of fan-type rapid maxillary expansion (RME) appliance and Hyrax RME appliance on the craniofacial structures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sample of the study included 12 patients with constricted maxillary arc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gopalakrishnan, Umarevathi, Sridhar, Premkumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5426169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28566854
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.205066
_version_ 1783235419672936448
author Gopalakrishnan, Umarevathi
Sridhar, Premkumar
author_facet Gopalakrishnan, Umarevathi
Sridhar, Premkumar
author_sort Gopalakrishnan, Umarevathi
collection PubMed
description AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study was to assess the skeletal and dental effects of fan-type rapid maxillary expansion (RME) appliance and Hyrax RME appliance on the craniofacial structures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sample of the study included 12 patients with constricted maxillary arches. Acrylic bonded type of attachment was used for both groups. Changes in sagittal, vertical, and transverse relationship were assessed with lateral and frontal cephalograms, respectively. Intercanine and intermolar widths were measured with stone models. Pre- and immediate post-treatment records were statistically analyzed with Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The differences between the groups were evaluated using Mann–Whitney U-test. Since the data pertaining to intercanine width and intermolar width were normally distributed, parametric test of significance (unpaired t-test) was used to compare them. RESULTS: Results showed that Hyrax presented with significantly greater increments for both nasal cavity width and maxillary width when compared to fan-type RME. Both groups had retroclination of incisors. The increase in the intercanine width was almost similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Fan-type RME caused only minimal expansion of the intermolar width when compared to the Hyrax. The ratio between the intercanine and intermolar width expansion was nearly 4:1 in the fan-type RME and 0.75:1 in Hyrax.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5426169
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54261692017-05-31 Assessment of the dental and skeletal effects of fan-type rapid maxillary expansion screw and Hyrax screw on craniofacial structures Gopalakrishnan, Umarevathi Sridhar, Premkumar Contemp Clin Dent Original Article AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study was to assess the skeletal and dental effects of fan-type rapid maxillary expansion (RME) appliance and Hyrax RME appliance on the craniofacial structures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sample of the study included 12 patients with constricted maxillary arches. Acrylic bonded type of attachment was used for both groups. Changes in sagittal, vertical, and transverse relationship were assessed with lateral and frontal cephalograms, respectively. Intercanine and intermolar widths were measured with stone models. Pre- and immediate post-treatment records were statistically analyzed with Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The differences between the groups were evaluated using Mann–Whitney U-test. Since the data pertaining to intercanine width and intermolar width were normally distributed, parametric test of significance (unpaired t-test) was used to compare them. RESULTS: Results showed that Hyrax presented with significantly greater increments for both nasal cavity width and maxillary width when compared to fan-type RME. Both groups had retroclination of incisors. The increase in the intercanine width was almost similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Fan-type RME caused only minimal expansion of the intermolar width when compared to the Hyrax. The ratio between the intercanine and intermolar width expansion was nearly 4:1 in the fan-type RME and 0.75:1 in Hyrax. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5426169/ /pubmed/28566854 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.205066 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Contemporary Clinical Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Gopalakrishnan, Umarevathi
Sridhar, Premkumar
Assessment of the dental and skeletal effects of fan-type rapid maxillary expansion screw and Hyrax screw on craniofacial structures
title Assessment of the dental and skeletal effects of fan-type rapid maxillary expansion screw and Hyrax screw on craniofacial structures
title_full Assessment of the dental and skeletal effects of fan-type rapid maxillary expansion screw and Hyrax screw on craniofacial structures
title_fullStr Assessment of the dental and skeletal effects of fan-type rapid maxillary expansion screw and Hyrax screw on craniofacial structures
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the dental and skeletal effects of fan-type rapid maxillary expansion screw and Hyrax screw on craniofacial structures
title_short Assessment of the dental and skeletal effects of fan-type rapid maxillary expansion screw and Hyrax screw on craniofacial structures
title_sort assessment of the dental and skeletal effects of fan-type rapid maxillary expansion screw and hyrax screw on craniofacial structures
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5426169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28566854
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.205066
work_keys_str_mv AT gopalakrishnanumarevathi assessmentofthedentalandskeletaleffectsoffantyperapidmaxillaryexpansionscrewandhyraxscrewoncraniofacialstructures
AT sridharpremkumar assessmentofthedentalandskeletaleffectsoffantyperapidmaxillaryexpansionscrewandhyraxscrewoncraniofacialstructures