Cargando…

Positive predictive value of peptic ulcer diagnosis codes in the Danish National Patient Registry

BACKGROUND: Diagnoses of peptic ulcer are registered in the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR) for administrative as well as research purposes, but it is unknown whether the coding validity depends on the location of the ulcer. OBJECTIVE: To validate the International Classification of Diseases...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Viborg, Søren, Søgaard, Kirstine Kobberøe, Jepsen, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5426472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28503076
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S132628
_version_ 1783235485316939776
author Viborg, Søren
Søgaard, Kirstine Kobberøe
Jepsen, Peter
author_facet Viborg, Søren
Søgaard, Kirstine Kobberøe
Jepsen, Peter
author_sort Viborg, Søren
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Diagnoses of peptic ulcer are registered in the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR) for administrative as well as research purposes, but it is unknown whether the coding validity depends on the location of the ulcer. OBJECTIVE: To validate the International Classification of Diseases, 10(th) revision diagnosis codes of peptic ulcer in the DNPR by estimating positive predictive values (PPVs) for gastric and duodenal ulcer diagnoses. METHODS: We identified all patients registered with a hospital discharge diagnosis of peptic ulcer from Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark, in 1995–2006. Among them, we randomly selected 200 who had an outpatient gastroscopy at the time of ulcer diagnosis. We reviewed the findings from these gastroscopies to confirm the presence of peptic ulcer and its location. We calculated PPVs and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of gastric and duodenal ulcer diagnoses, using descriptions from the gastroscopic examinations as standard reference. RESULTS: In total, 182 records (91%) were available for review. The overall PPV of peptic ulcer diagnoses in DNPR was 95.6% (95% CI 91.5–98.1), with PPVs of 90.3% (95% CI 82.4–95.5) for gastric ulcer diagnoses, and 94.4% (95% CI 87.4–98.2) for duodenal ulcer diagnoses. PPVs were constant over time. CONCLUSION: The PPV of uncomplicated peptic ulcer diagnoses in the DNPR is high, and the location of the ulcers is registered correctly in most cases, indicating that the diagnoses are useful for research purposes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5426472
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54264722017-05-12 Positive predictive value of peptic ulcer diagnosis codes in the Danish National Patient Registry Viborg, Søren Søgaard, Kirstine Kobberøe Jepsen, Peter Clin Epidemiol Original Research BACKGROUND: Diagnoses of peptic ulcer are registered in the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR) for administrative as well as research purposes, but it is unknown whether the coding validity depends on the location of the ulcer. OBJECTIVE: To validate the International Classification of Diseases, 10(th) revision diagnosis codes of peptic ulcer in the DNPR by estimating positive predictive values (PPVs) for gastric and duodenal ulcer diagnoses. METHODS: We identified all patients registered with a hospital discharge diagnosis of peptic ulcer from Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark, in 1995–2006. Among them, we randomly selected 200 who had an outpatient gastroscopy at the time of ulcer diagnosis. We reviewed the findings from these gastroscopies to confirm the presence of peptic ulcer and its location. We calculated PPVs and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of gastric and duodenal ulcer diagnoses, using descriptions from the gastroscopic examinations as standard reference. RESULTS: In total, 182 records (91%) were available for review. The overall PPV of peptic ulcer diagnoses in DNPR was 95.6% (95% CI 91.5–98.1), with PPVs of 90.3% (95% CI 82.4–95.5) for gastric ulcer diagnoses, and 94.4% (95% CI 87.4–98.2) for duodenal ulcer diagnoses. PPVs were constant over time. CONCLUSION: The PPV of uncomplicated peptic ulcer diagnoses in the DNPR is high, and the location of the ulcers is registered correctly in most cases, indicating that the diagnoses are useful for research purposes. Dove Medical Press 2017-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5426472/ /pubmed/28503076 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S132628 Text en © 2017 Viborg et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Viborg, Søren
Søgaard, Kirstine Kobberøe
Jepsen, Peter
Positive predictive value of peptic ulcer diagnosis codes in the Danish National Patient Registry
title Positive predictive value of peptic ulcer diagnosis codes in the Danish National Patient Registry
title_full Positive predictive value of peptic ulcer diagnosis codes in the Danish National Patient Registry
title_fullStr Positive predictive value of peptic ulcer diagnosis codes in the Danish National Patient Registry
title_full_unstemmed Positive predictive value of peptic ulcer diagnosis codes in the Danish National Patient Registry
title_short Positive predictive value of peptic ulcer diagnosis codes in the Danish National Patient Registry
title_sort positive predictive value of peptic ulcer diagnosis codes in the danish national patient registry
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5426472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28503076
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S132628
work_keys_str_mv AT viborgsøren positivepredictivevalueofpepticulcerdiagnosiscodesinthedanishnationalpatientregistry
AT søgaardkirstinekobberøe positivepredictivevalueofpepticulcerdiagnosiscodesinthedanishnationalpatientregistry
AT jepsenpeter positivepredictivevalueofpepticulcerdiagnosiscodesinthedanishnationalpatientregistry