Cargando…

Is Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Effective for Traumatic Brain Injury? A Rapid Evidence Assessment of the Literature and Recommendations for the Field

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review examines the efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO(2)) for traumatic brain injury (TBI) to make evidence-based recommendations for its application and future research. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted to identify studies through 2014. Methodological qualit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crawford, Cindy, Teo, Lynn, Yang, EunMee, Isbister, Caitlin, Berry, Kevin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Aspen Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5426690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27603765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000256
_version_ 1783235528993275904
author Crawford, Cindy
Teo, Lynn
Yang, EunMee
Isbister, Caitlin
Berry, Kevin
author_facet Crawford, Cindy
Teo, Lynn
Yang, EunMee
Isbister, Caitlin
Berry, Kevin
author_sort Crawford, Cindy
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This systematic review examines the efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO(2)) for traumatic brain injury (TBI) to make evidence-based recommendations for its application and future research. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted to identify studies through 2014. Methodological quality was assessed and synthesis and interpretation of relevant data was performed. RESULTS: Twelve randomized trials were included. All mild TBI studies demonstrated minimal bias and no statistically significant differences between HBO(2) and sham arms. Statistically significant improvement occurred over time within both groups. Moderate-to-severe TBI studies were of mixed quality, with majority of results favoring HBO(2) compared with “standard care.” The placebo analysis conducted was limited by lack of details. CONCLUSIONS: For mild TBI, results indicate HBO(2) is no better than sham treatment. Improvements within both HBO(2) and sham groups cannot be ignored. For acute treatment of moderate-to-severe TBI, although methodology appears flawed across some studies, because of the complexity of brain injury, HBO(2) may be beneficial as a relatively safe adjunctive therapy if feasible. Further research should be considered to resolve the controversy surrounding this field, but only if methodological flaws are avoided and bias minimized.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5426690
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Aspen Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54266902017-05-22 Is Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Effective for Traumatic Brain Injury? A Rapid Evidence Assessment of the Literature and Recommendations for the Field Crawford, Cindy Teo, Lynn Yang, EunMee Isbister, Caitlin Berry, Kevin J Head Trauma Rehabil Original Articles OBJECTIVE: This systematic review examines the efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO(2)) for traumatic brain injury (TBI) to make evidence-based recommendations for its application and future research. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted to identify studies through 2014. Methodological quality was assessed and synthesis and interpretation of relevant data was performed. RESULTS: Twelve randomized trials were included. All mild TBI studies demonstrated minimal bias and no statistically significant differences between HBO(2) and sham arms. Statistically significant improvement occurred over time within both groups. Moderate-to-severe TBI studies were of mixed quality, with majority of results favoring HBO(2) compared with “standard care.” The placebo analysis conducted was limited by lack of details. CONCLUSIONS: For mild TBI, results indicate HBO(2) is no better than sham treatment. Improvements within both HBO(2) and sham groups cannot be ignored. For acute treatment of moderate-to-severe TBI, although methodology appears flawed across some studies, because of the complexity of brain injury, HBO(2) may be beneficial as a relatively safe adjunctive therapy if feasible. Further research should be considered to resolve the controversy surrounding this field, but only if methodological flaws are avoided and bias minimized. Aspen Publications 2017-05 2016-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5426690/ /pubmed/27603765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000256 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Crawford, Cindy
Teo, Lynn
Yang, EunMee
Isbister, Caitlin
Berry, Kevin
Is Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Effective for Traumatic Brain Injury? A Rapid Evidence Assessment of the Literature and Recommendations for the Field
title Is Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Effective for Traumatic Brain Injury? A Rapid Evidence Assessment of the Literature and Recommendations for the Field
title_full Is Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Effective for Traumatic Brain Injury? A Rapid Evidence Assessment of the Literature and Recommendations for the Field
title_fullStr Is Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Effective for Traumatic Brain Injury? A Rapid Evidence Assessment of the Literature and Recommendations for the Field
title_full_unstemmed Is Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Effective for Traumatic Brain Injury? A Rapid Evidence Assessment of the Literature and Recommendations for the Field
title_short Is Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Effective for Traumatic Brain Injury? A Rapid Evidence Assessment of the Literature and Recommendations for the Field
title_sort is hyperbaric oxygen therapy effective for traumatic brain injury? a rapid evidence assessment of the literature and recommendations for the field
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5426690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27603765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000256
work_keys_str_mv AT crawfordcindy ishyperbaricoxygentherapyeffectivefortraumaticbraininjuryarapidevidenceassessmentoftheliteratureandrecommendationsforthefield
AT teolynn ishyperbaricoxygentherapyeffectivefortraumaticbraininjuryarapidevidenceassessmentoftheliteratureandrecommendationsforthefield
AT yangeunmee ishyperbaricoxygentherapyeffectivefortraumaticbraininjuryarapidevidenceassessmentoftheliteratureandrecommendationsforthefield
AT isbistercaitlin ishyperbaricoxygentherapyeffectivefortraumaticbraininjuryarapidevidenceassessmentoftheliteratureandrecommendationsforthefield
AT berrykevin ishyperbaricoxygentherapyeffectivefortraumaticbraininjuryarapidevidenceassessmentoftheliteratureandrecommendationsforthefield