Cargando…

Clinical Validation of a Sound Processor Upgrade in Direct Acoustic Cochlear Implant Subjects

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of the investigation were to evaluate the effect of a sound processor upgrade on the speech reception threshold in noise and to collect long-term safety and efficacy data after 2½ to 5 years of device use of direct acoustic cochlear implant (DACI) recipients. STUDY DESIGN:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kludt, Eugen, D’hondt, Christiane, Lenarz, Thomas, Maier, Hannes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5426695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28406848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000001404
_version_ 1783235530207526912
author Kludt, Eugen
D’hondt, Christiane
Lenarz, Thomas
Maier, Hannes
author_facet Kludt, Eugen
D’hondt, Christiane
Lenarz, Thomas
Maier, Hannes
author_sort Kludt, Eugen
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objectives of the investigation were to evaluate the effect of a sound processor upgrade on the speech reception threshold in noise and to collect long-term safety and efficacy data after 2½ to 5 years of device use of direct acoustic cochlear implant (DACI) recipients. STUDY DESIGN: The study was designed as a mono-centric, prospective clinical trial. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Fifteen patients implanted with a direct acoustic cochlear implant. INTERVENTION: Upgrade with a newer generation of sound processor. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Speech recognition test in quiet and in noise, pure tone thresholds, subject-reported outcome measures. RESULTS: The speech recognition in quiet and in noise is superior after the sound processor upgrade and stable after long-term use of the direct acoustic cochlear implant. The bone conduction thresholds did not decrease significantly after long-term high level stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: The new sound processor for the DACI system provides significant benefits for DACI users for speech recognition in both quiet and noise. Especially the noise program with the use of directional microphones (Zoom) allows DACI patients to have much less difficulty when having conversations in noisy environments. Furthermore, the study confirms that the benefits of the sound processor upgrade are available to the DACI recipients even after several years of experience with a legacy sound processor. Finally, our study demonstrates that the DACI system is a safe and effective long-term therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5426695
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54266952017-05-22 Clinical Validation of a Sound Processor Upgrade in Direct Acoustic Cochlear Implant Subjects Kludt, Eugen D’hondt, Christiane Lenarz, Thomas Maier, Hannes Otol Neurotol Audiology OBJECTIVE: The objectives of the investigation were to evaluate the effect of a sound processor upgrade on the speech reception threshold in noise and to collect long-term safety and efficacy data after 2½ to 5 years of device use of direct acoustic cochlear implant (DACI) recipients. STUDY DESIGN: The study was designed as a mono-centric, prospective clinical trial. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Fifteen patients implanted with a direct acoustic cochlear implant. INTERVENTION: Upgrade with a newer generation of sound processor. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Speech recognition test in quiet and in noise, pure tone thresholds, subject-reported outcome measures. RESULTS: The speech recognition in quiet and in noise is superior after the sound processor upgrade and stable after long-term use of the direct acoustic cochlear implant. The bone conduction thresholds did not decrease significantly after long-term high level stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: The new sound processor for the DACI system provides significant benefits for DACI users for speech recognition in both quiet and noise. Especially the noise program with the use of directional microphones (Zoom) allows DACI patients to have much less difficulty when having conversations in noisy environments. Furthermore, the study confirms that the benefits of the sound processor upgrade are available to the DACI recipients even after several years of experience with a legacy sound processor. Finally, our study demonstrates that the DACI system is a safe and effective long-term therapy. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017-06 2017-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5426695/ /pubmed/28406848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000001404 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of Otology & Neurotology, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle Audiology
Kludt, Eugen
D’hondt, Christiane
Lenarz, Thomas
Maier, Hannes
Clinical Validation of a Sound Processor Upgrade in Direct Acoustic Cochlear Implant Subjects
title Clinical Validation of a Sound Processor Upgrade in Direct Acoustic Cochlear Implant Subjects
title_full Clinical Validation of a Sound Processor Upgrade in Direct Acoustic Cochlear Implant Subjects
title_fullStr Clinical Validation of a Sound Processor Upgrade in Direct Acoustic Cochlear Implant Subjects
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Validation of a Sound Processor Upgrade in Direct Acoustic Cochlear Implant Subjects
title_short Clinical Validation of a Sound Processor Upgrade in Direct Acoustic Cochlear Implant Subjects
title_sort clinical validation of a sound processor upgrade in direct acoustic cochlear implant subjects
topic Audiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5426695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28406848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000001404
work_keys_str_mv AT kludteugen clinicalvalidationofasoundprocessorupgradeindirectacousticcochlearimplantsubjects
AT dhondtchristiane clinicalvalidationofasoundprocessorupgradeindirectacousticcochlearimplantsubjects
AT lenarzthomas clinicalvalidationofasoundprocessorupgradeindirectacousticcochlearimplantsubjects
AT maierhannes clinicalvalidationofasoundprocessorupgradeindirectacousticcochlearimplantsubjects