Cargando…
Farmer-suicide in India: debating the role of biotechnology
Indian Biotech opponents have attributed the increase of suicides to the monopolization of GM seeds, centering on patent control, application of terminator technology, marketing strategy, and increased production costs. The contentions of the biotech opponents, however, have been criticized for a la...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5427059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28497354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40504-017-0052-z |
_version_ | 1783235589022154752 |
---|---|
author | Thomas, Gigesh De Tavernier, Johan |
author_facet | Thomas, Gigesh De Tavernier, Johan |
author_sort | Thomas, Gigesh |
collection | PubMed |
description | Indian Biotech opponents have attributed the increase of suicides to the monopolization of GM seeds, centering on patent control, application of terminator technology, marketing strategy, and increased production costs. The contentions of the biotech opponents, however, have been criticized for a lack of transparency in their modus operandi i.e. the use of methodology in their argumentation. The fact is, however, that with the intention of getting the attention of those capable of determining the future of GM cotton in India, opponents resorted to generating controversies. Therefore, this article will review and evaluate the multifaceted contentions of both opponents and defenders. Although the association between seed monopolization and farmer-suicide is debatable, we will show that there is a link between the economic factors associated with Bt. cultivation and farmer suicide. The underlying thesis of biotech opponents becomes all the more significant when analysed vis-à-vis the contention of the globalization critics that there has been a political and economic marginalization of the Indian farmers. Their accusation assumes significance in the context of a fragile democracy like India where market forces are accorded precedence over farmers’ needs until election time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5427059 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54270592017-05-18 Farmer-suicide in India: debating the role of biotechnology Thomas, Gigesh De Tavernier, Johan Life Sci Soc Policy Research Indian Biotech opponents have attributed the increase of suicides to the monopolization of GM seeds, centering on patent control, application of terminator technology, marketing strategy, and increased production costs. The contentions of the biotech opponents, however, have been criticized for a lack of transparency in their modus operandi i.e. the use of methodology in their argumentation. The fact is, however, that with the intention of getting the attention of those capable of determining the future of GM cotton in India, opponents resorted to generating controversies. Therefore, this article will review and evaluate the multifaceted contentions of both opponents and defenders. Although the association between seed monopolization and farmer-suicide is debatable, we will show that there is a link between the economic factors associated with Bt. cultivation and farmer suicide. The underlying thesis of biotech opponents becomes all the more significant when analysed vis-à-vis the contention of the globalization critics that there has been a political and economic marginalization of the Indian farmers. Their accusation assumes significance in the context of a fragile democracy like India where market forces are accorded precedence over farmers’ needs until election time. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5427059/ /pubmed/28497354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40504-017-0052-z Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Thomas, Gigesh De Tavernier, Johan Farmer-suicide in India: debating the role of biotechnology |
title | Farmer-suicide in India: debating the role of biotechnology |
title_full | Farmer-suicide in India: debating the role of biotechnology |
title_fullStr | Farmer-suicide in India: debating the role of biotechnology |
title_full_unstemmed | Farmer-suicide in India: debating the role of biotechnology |
title_short | Farmer-suicide in India: debating the role of biotechnology |
title_sort | farmer-suicide in india: debating the role of biotechnology |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5427059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28497354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40504-017-0052-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thomasgigesh farmersuicideinindiadebatingtheroleofbiotechnology AT detavernierjohan farmersuicideinindiadebatingtheroleofbiotechnology |