Cargando…

Assessing Dispositions Toward Ridicule and Laughter in the Workplace: Adapting and Validating the PhoPhiKat-9 Questionnaire

The current paper addresses the measurement of three dispositions toward ridicule and laughter; i.e., gelotophobia (the fear of being laughed at), gelotophilia (the joy of being laughed at), and katagelasticism (the joy of laughing at others). These traits explain inter-individual differences in res...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hofmann, Jennifer, Ruch, Willibald, Proyer, René T., Platt, Tracey, Gander, Fabian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5427070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28553241
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00714
_version_ 1783235591878475776
author Hofmann, Jennifer
Ruch, Willibald
Proyer, René T.
Platt, Tracey
Gander, Fabian
author_facet Hofmann, Jennifer
Ruch, Willibald
Proyer, René T.
Platt, Tracey
Gander, Fabian
author_sort Hofmann, Jennifer
collection PubMed
description The current paper addresses the measurement of three dispositions toward ridicule and laughter; i.e., gelotophobia (the fear of being laughed at), gelotophilia (the joy of being laughed at), and katagelasticism (the joy of laughing at others). These traits explain inter-individual differences in responses to humor, laughter, and social situations related to humorous encounters. First, an ultra-short form of the PhoPhiKat-45 (Ruch and Proyer, 2009) was adapted in two independent samples (Construction Sample N = 157; Replication Sample N = 1,774). Second, we tested the validity of the PhoPhiKat-9 in two further independent samples. Results showed that the psychometric properties of the ultra-short form were acceptable and the proposed factor structure could be replicated. In Validation Sample 1 (N = 246), we investigated the relation of the three traits to responses in a ridicule and teasing scenario questionnaire. The results replicated findings from earlier studies by showing that gelotophobes assigned the same emotions to friendly teasing and malicious ridicule (predominantly low joy, high fear, and shame). Gelotophilia was mainly predicted by relating joy to both, teasing and ridicule scenarios, while katagelasticism was predicted by assigning joy and contempt to ridicule scenarios. In Validation Sample 2 (N = 1,248), we investigated whether the fear of being laughed at is a vulnerability at the workplace: If friendly teasing and laughter of co-workers, superiors, or customers are misperceived as being malicious, individuals may feel less satisfied and more stressed. The results from a representative sample of Swiss employees showed that individuals with a fear of being laughed at are generally less satisfied with life and work and experience more work stress. Moreover, gelotophilia went along with positive evaluations of one's life and work, while katagelasticism was negatively related to work satisfaction and positively related to work stress. In order to establish good work practices and build procedures against workplace bullying, one needs to consider that individual differences impact on a person's perception of being bullied and assessing the three dispositions may give important insights into team processes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5427070
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54270702017-05-26 Assessing Dispositions Toward Ridicule and Laughter in the Workplace: Adapting and Validating the PhoPhiKat-9 Questionnaire Hofmann, Jennifer Ruch, Willibald Proyer, René T. Platt, Tracey Gander, Fabian Front Psychol Psychology The current paper addresses the measurement of three dispositions toward ridicule and laughter; i.e., gelotophobia (the fear of being laughed at), gelotophilia (the joy of being laughed at), and katagelasticism (the joy of laughing at others). These traits explain inter-individual differences in responses to humor, laughter, and social situations related to humorous encounters. First, an ultra-short form of the PhoPhiKat-45 (Ruch and Proyer, 2009) was adapted in two independent samples (Construction Sample N = 157; Replication Sample N = 1,774). Second, we tested the validity of the PhoPhiKat-9 in two further independent samples. Results showed that the psychometric properties of the ultra-short form were acceptable and the proposed factor structure could be replicated. In Validation Sample 1 (N = 246), we investigated the relation of the three traits to responses in a ridicule and teasing scenario questionnaire. The results replicated findings from earlier studies by showing that gelotophobes assigned the same emotions to friendly teasing and malicious ridicule (predominantly low joy, high fear, and shame). Gelotophilia was mainly predicted by relating joy to both, teasing and ridicule scenarios, while katagelasticism was predicted by assigning joy and contempt to ridicule scenarios. In Validation Sample 2 (N = 1,248), we investigated whether the fear of being laughed at is a vulnerability at the workplace: If friendly teasing and laughter of co-workers, superiors, or customers are misperceived as being malicious, individuals may feel less satisfied and more stressed. The results from a representative sample of Swiss employees showed that individuals with a fear of being laughed at are generally less satisfied with life and work and experience more work stress. Moreover, gelotophilia went along with positive evaluations of one's life and work, while katagelasticism was negatively related to work satisfaction and positively related to work stress. In order to establish good work practices and build procedures against workplace bullying, one needs to consider that individual differences impact on a person's perception of being bullied and assessing the three dispositions may give important insights into team processes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5427070/ /pubmed/28553241 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00714 Text en Copyright © 2017 Hofmann, Ruch, Proyer, Platt and Gander. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Hofmann, Jennifer
Ruch, Willibald
Proyer, René T.
Platt, Tracey
Gander, Fabian
Assessing Dispositions Toward Ridicule and Laughter in the Workplace: Adapting and Validating the PhoPhiKat-9 Questionnaire
title Assessing Dispositions Toward Ridicule and Laughter in the Workplace: Adapting and Validating the PhoPhiKat-9 Questionnaire
title_full Assessing Dispositions Toward Ridicule and Laughter in the Workplace: Adapting and Validating the PhoPhiKat-9 Questionnaire
title_fullStr Assessing Dispositions Toward Ridicule and Laughter in the Workplace: Adapting and Validating the PhoPhiKat-9 Questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Dispositions Toward Ridicule and Laughter in the Workplace: Adapting and Validating the PhoPhiKat-9 Questionnaire
title_short Assessing Dispositions Toward Ridicule and Laughter in the Workplace: Adapting and Validating the PhoPhiKat-9 Questionnaire
title_sort assessing dispositions toward ridicule and laughter in the workplace: adapting and validating the phophikat-9 questionnaire
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5427070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28553241
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00714
work_keys_str_mv AT hofmannjennifer assessingdispositionstowardridiculeandlaughterintheworkplaceadaptingandvalidatingthephophikat9questionnaire
AT ruchwillibald assessingdispositionstowardridiculeandlaughterintheworkplaceadaptingandvalidatingthephophikat9questionnaire
AT proyerrenet assessingdispositionstowardridiculeandlaughterintheworkplaceadaptingandvalidatingthephophikat9questionnaire
AT platttracey assessingdispositionstowardridiculeandlaughterintheworkplaceadaptingandvalidatingthephophikat9questionnaire
AT ganderfabian assessingdispositionstowardridiculeandlaughterintheworkplaceadaptingandvalidatingthephophikat9questionnaire