Cargando…
No association between hand and foot temperature responses during local cold stress and rewarming
PURPOSE: The purpose was to examine whether associations exist between temperature responses in the fingers vs. toes and hand vs. foot during local cold-water immersion and rewarming phases. METHODS: Seventy healthy subjects (58 males, 12 females) immersed their right hand or right foot, respectivel...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5427170/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28421275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-017-3601-5 |
_version_ | 1783235618223947776 |
---|---|
author | Norrbrand, Lena Kölegård, Roger Keramidas, Michail E. Mekjavic, Igor B. Eiken, Ola |
author_facet | Norrbrand, Lena Kölegård, Roger Keramidas, Michail E. Mekjavic, Igor B. Eiken, Ola |
author_sort | Norrbrand, Lena |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The purpose was to examine whether associations exist between temperature responses in the fingers vs. toes and hand vs. foot during local cold-water immersion and rewarming phases. METHODS: Seventy healthy subjects (58 males, 12 females) immersed their right hand or right foot, respectively, in 8 °C water for 30 min (CWI phase), followed by a 15-min spontaneous rewarming (RW) in 25 °C air temperature. RESULTS: Temperature was lower in the toes than the fingers during the baseline phase (27.8 ± 3.0 vs. 33.9 ± 2.5 °C, p < 0.001), parts of the CWI phase (min 20–30: 8.8 ± 0.7 vs. 9.7 ± 1.4 °C, p < 0.001), and during the RW phase (peak temperature: 22.5 ± 5.1 vs. 32.7 ± 3.6 °C, p < 0.001). Cold-induced vasodilatation (CIVD) was more common in the fingers than in the toes (p < 0.001). Within the first 10 min of CWI, 61% of the subjects exhibited a CIVD response in the fingers, while only 6% of the subjects had a CIVD response in the toes. There was a large variability of temperature responses both within and between extremities, and there was a weak correlation between finger- and toe temperature both during the CWI (r = 0.21, p = 0.08) and the RW phases (r = 0.26, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that there is generally a lower temperature in the toes than the fingers after a short time of local cold exposure and that the thermal responses of the fingers/hands are not readily transferable to the toes/foot. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5427170 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54271702017-05-26 No association between hand and foot temperature responses during local cold stress and rewarming Norrbrand, Lena Kölegård, Roger Keramidas, Michail E. Mekjavic, Igor B. Eiken, Ola Eur J Appl Physiol Original Article PURPOSE: The purpose was to examine whether associations exist between temperature responses in the fingers vs. toes and hand vs. foot during local cold-water immersion and rewarming phases. METHODS: Seventy healthy subjects (58 males, 12 females) immersed their right hand or right foot, respectively, in 8 °C water for 30 min (CWI phase), followed by a 15-min spontaneous rewarming (RW) in 25 °C air temperature. RESULTS: Temperature was lower in the toes than the fingers during the baseline phase (27.8 ± 3.0 vs. 33.9 ± 2.5 °C, p < 0.001), parts of the CWI phase (min 20–30: 8.8 ± 0.7 vs. 9.7 ± 1.4 °C, p < 0.001), and during the RW phase (peak temperature: 22.5 ± 5.1 vs. 32.7 ± 3.6 °C, p < 0.001). Cold-induced vasodilatation (CIVD) was more common in the fingers than in the toes (p < 0.001). Within the first 10 min of CWI, 61% of the subjects exhibited a CIVD response in the fingers, while only 6% of the subjects had a CIVD response in the toes. There was a large variability of temperature responses both within and between extremities, and there was a weak correlation between finger- and toe temperature both during the CWI (r = 0.21, p = 0.08) and the RW phases (r = 0.26, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that there is generally a lower temperature in the toes than the fingers after a short time of local cold exposure and that the thermal responses of the fingers/hands are not readily transferable to the toes/foot. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-04-18 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5427170/ /pubmed/28421275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-017-3601-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Norrbrand, Lena Kölegård, Roger Keramidas, Michail E. Mekjavic, Igor B. Eiken, Ola No association between hand and foot temperature responses during local cold stress and rewarming |
title | No association between hand and foot temperature responses during local cold stress and rewarming |
title_full | No association between hand and foot temperature responses during local cold stress and rewarming |
title_fullStr | No association between hand and foot temperature responses during local cold stress and rewarming |
title_full_unstemmed | No association between hand and foot temperature responses during local cold stress and rewarming |
title_short | No association between hand and foot temperature responses during local cold stress and rewarming |
title_sort | no association between hand and foot temperature responses during local cold stress and rewarming |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5427170/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28421275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-017-3601-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT norrbrandlena noassociationbetweenhandandfoottemperatureresponsesduringlocalcoldstressandrewarming AT kolegardroger noassociationbetweenhandandfoottemperatureresponsesduringlocalcoldstressandrewarming AT keramidasmichaile noassociationbetweenhandandfoottemperatureresponsesduringlocalcoldstressandrewarming AT mekjavicigorb noassociationbetweenhandandfoottemperatureresponsesduringlocalcoldstressandrewarming AT eikenola noassociationbetweenhandandfoottemperatureresponsesduringlocalcoldstressandrewarming |