Cargando…

No association between hand and foot temperature responses during local cold stress and rewarming

PURPOSE: The purpose was to examine whether associations exist between temperature responses in the fingers vs. toes and hand vs. foot during local cold-water immersion and rewarming phases. METHODS: Seventy healthy subjects (58 males, 12 females) immersed their right hand or right foot, respectivel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Norrbrand, Lena, Kölegård, Roger, Keramidas, Michail E., Mekjavic, Igor B., Eiken, Ola
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5427170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28421275
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-017-3601-5
_version_ 1783235618223947776
author Norrbrand, Lena
Kölegård, Roger
Keramidas, Michail E.
Mekjavic, Igor B.
Eiken, Ola
author_facet Norrbrand, Lena
Kölegård, Roger
Keramidas, Michail E.
Mekjavic, Igor B.
Eiken, Ola
author_sort Norrbrand, Lena
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose was to examine whether associations exist between temperature responses in the fingers vs. toes and hand vs. foot during local cold-water immersion and rewarming phases. METHODS: Seventy healthy subjects (58 males, 12 females) immersed their right hand or right foot, respectively, in 8 °C water for 30 min (CWI phase), followed by a 15-min spontaneous rewarming (RW) in 25 °C air temperature. RESULTS: Temperature was lower in the toes than the fingers during the baseline phase (27.8 ± 3.0 vs. 33.9 ± 2.5 °C, p < 0.001), parts of the CWI phase (min 20–30: 8.8 ± 0.7 vs. 9.7 ± 1.4 °C, p < 0.001), and during the RW phase (peak temperature: 22.5 ± 5.1 vs. 32.7 ± 3.6 °C, p < 0.001). Cold-induced vasodilatation (CIVD) was more common in the fingers than in the toes (p < 0.001). Within the first 10 min of CWI, 61% of the subjects exhibited a CIVD response in the fingers, while only 6% of the subjects had a CIVD response in the toes. There was a large variability of temperature responses both within and between extremities, and there was a weak correlation between finger- and toe temperature both during the CWI (r = 0.21, p = 0.08) and the RW phases (r = 0.26, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that there is generally a lower temperature in the toes than the fingers after a short time of local cold exposure and that the thermal responses of the fingers/hands are not readily transferable to the toes/foot.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5427170
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54271702017-05-26 No association between hand and foot temperature responses during local cold stress and rewarming Norrbrand, Lena Kölegård, Roger Keramidas, Michail E. Mekjavic, Igor B. Eiken, Ola Eur J Appl Physiol Original Article PURPOSE: The purpose was to examine whether associations exist between temperature responses in the fingers vs. toes and hand vs. foot during local cold-water immersion and rewarming phases. METHODS: Seventy healthy subjects (58 males, 12 females) immersed their right hand or right foot, respectively, in 8 °C water for 30 min (CWI phase), followed by a 15-min spontaneous rewarming (RW) in 25 °C air temperature. RESULTS: Temperature was lower in the toes than the fingers during the baseline phase (27.8 ± 3.0 vs. 33.9 ± 2.5 °C, p < 0.001), parts of the CWI phase (min 20–30: 8.8 ± 0.7 vs. 9.7 ± 1.4 °C, p < 0.001), and during the RW phase (peak temperature: 22.5 ± 5.1 vs. 32.7 ± 3.6 °C, p < 0.001). Cold-induced vasodilatation (CIVD) was more common in the fingers than in the toes (p < 0.001). Within the first 10 min of CWI, 61% of the subjects exhibited a CIVD response in the fingers, while only 6% of the subjects had a CIVD response in the toes. There was a large variability of temperature responses both within and between extremities, and there was a weak correlation between finger- and toe temperature both during the CWI (r = 0.21, p = 0.08) and the RW phases (r = 0.26, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that there is generally a lower temperature in the toes than the fingers after a short time of local cold exposure and that the thermal responses of the fingers/hands are not readily transferable to the toes/foot. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-04-18 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5427170/ /pubmed/28421275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-017-3601-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Norrbrand, Lena
Kölegård, Roger
Keramidas, Michail E.
Mekjavic, Igor B.
Eiken, Ola
No association between hand and foot temperature responses during local cold stress and rewarming
title No association between hand and foot temperature responses during local cold stress and rewarming
title_full No association between hand and foot temperature responses during local cold stress and rewarming
title_fullStr No association between hand and foot temperature responses during local cold stress and rewarming
title_full_unstemmed No association between hand and foot temperature responses during local cold stress and rewarming
title_short No association between hand and foot temperature responses during local cold stress and rewarming
title_sort no association between hand and foot temperature responses during local cold stress and rewarming
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5427170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28421275
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-017-3601-5
work_keys_str_mv AT norrbrandlena noassociationbetweenhandandfoottemperatureresponsesduringlocalcoldstressandrewarming
AT kolegardroger noassociationbetweenhandandfoottemperatureresponsesduringlocalcoldstressandrewarming
AT keramidasmichaile noassociationbetweenhandandfoottemperatureresponsesduringlocalcoldstressandrewarming
AT mekjavicigorb noassociationbetweenhandandfoottemperatureresponsesduringlocalcoldstressandrewarming
AT eikenola noassociationbetweenhandandfoottemperatureresponsesduringlocalcoldstressandrewarming