Cargando…

How Changes in Anti-SD Sequences Would Affect SD Sequences in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis

The 3′ end of the small ribosomal RNAs (ssu rRNA) in bacteria is directly involved in the selection and binding of mRNA transcripts during translation initiation via well-documented interactions between a Shine-Dalgarno (SD) sequence located upstream of the initiation codon and an anti-SD (aSD) sequ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abolbaghaei, Akram, Silke, Jordan R., Xia, Xuhua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Genetics Society of America 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5427494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28364038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.117.039305
_version_ 1783235636944175104
author Abolbaghaei, Akram
Silke, Jordan R.
Xia, Xuhua
author_facet Abolbaghaei, Akram
Silke, Jordan R.
Xia, Xuhua
author_sort Abolbaghaei, Akram
collection PubMed
description The 3′ end of the small ribosomal RNAs (ssu rRNA) in bacteria is directly involved in the selection and binding of mRNA transcripts during translation initiation via well-documented interactions between a Shine-Dalgarno (SD) sequence located upstream of the initiation codon and an anti-SD (aSD) sequence at the 3′ end of the ssu rRNA. Consequently, the 3′ end of ssu rRNA (3′TAIL) is strongly conserved among bacterial species because a change in the region may impact the translation of many protein-coding genes. Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis differ in their 3′ ends of ssu rRNA, being GAUCACCUCCUUA3′ in E. coli and GAUCACCUCCUUUCU3′ or GAUCACCUCCUUUCUA3′ in B. subtilis. Such differences in 3′TAIL lead to species-specific SDs (designated SD(Ec) for E. coli and SD(Bs) for B. subtilis) that can form strong and well-positioned SD/aSD pairing in one species but not in the other. Selection mediated by the species-specific 3′TAIL is expected to favor SD(Bs) against SD(Ec) in B. subtilis, but favor SD(Ec) against SD(Bs) in E. coli. Among well-positioned SDs, SD(Ec) is used more in E. coli than in B. subtilis, and SD(Bs) more in B. subtilis than in E. coli. Highly expressed genes and genes of high translation efficiency tend to have longer SDs than lowly expressed genes and genes with low translation efficiency in both species, but more so in B. subtilis than in E. coli. Both species overuse SDs matching the bolded part of the 3′TAIL shown above. The 3′TAIL difference contributes to the host specificity of phages.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5427494
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Genetics Society of America
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54274942017-05-12 How Changes in Anti-SD Sequences Would Affect SD Sequences in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis Abolbaghaei, Akram Silke, Jordan R. Xia, Xuhua G3 (Bethesda) Investigations The 3′ end of the small ribosomal RNAs (ssu rRNA) in bacteria is directly involved in the selection and binding of mRNA transcripts during translation initiation via well-documented interactions between a Shine-Dalgarno (SD) sequence located upstream of the initiation codon and an anti-SD (aSD) sequence at the 3′ end of the ssu rRNA. Consequently, the 3′ end of ssu rRNA (3′TAIL) is strongly conserved among bacterial species because a change in the region may impact the translation of many protein-coding genes. Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis differ in their 3′ ends of ssu rRNA, being GAUCACCUCCUUA3′ in E. coli and GAUCACCUCCUUUCU3′ or GAUCACCUCCUUUCUA3′ in B. subtilis. Such differences in 3′TAIL lead to species-specific SDs (designated SD(Ec) for E. coli and SD(Bs) for B. subtilis) that can form strong and well-positioned SD/aSD pairing in one species but not in the other. Selection mediated by the species-specific 3′TAIL is expected to favor SD(Bs) against SD(Ec) in B. subtilis, but favor SD(Ec) against SD(Bs) in E. coli. Among well-positioned SDs, SD(Ec) is used more in E. coli than in B. subtilis, and SD(Bs) more in B. subtilis than in E. coli. Highly expressed genes and genes of high translation efficiency tend to have longer SDs than lowly expressed genes and genes with low translation efficiency in both species, but more so in B. subtilis than in E. coli. Both species overuse SDs matching the bolded part of the 3′TAIL shown above. The 3′TAIL difference contributes to the host specificity of phages. Genetics Society of America 2017-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5427494/ /pubmed/28364038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.117.039305 Text en Copyright © 2017 Abolbaghaei et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Investigations
Abolbaghaei, Akram
Silke, Jordan R.
Xia, Xuhua
How Changes in Anti-SD Sequences Would Affect SD Sequences in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis
title How Changes in Anti-SD Sequences Would Affect SD Sequences in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis
title_full How Changes in Anti-SD Sequences Would Affect SD Sequences in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis
title_fullStr How Changes in Anti-SD Sequences Would Affect SD Sequences in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis
title_full_unstemmed How Changes in Anti-SD Sequences Would Affect SD Sequences in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis
title_short How Changes in Anti-SD Sequences Would Affect SD Sequences in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis
title_sort how changes in anti-sd sequences would affect sd sequences in escherichia coli and bacillus subtilis
topic Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5427494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28364038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.117.039305
work_keys_str_mv AT abolbaghaeiakram howchangesinantisdsequenceswouldaffectsdsequencesinescherichiacoliandbacillussubtilis
AT silkejordanr howchangesinantisdsequenceswouldaffectsdsequencesinescherichiacoliandbacillussubtilis
AT xiaxuhua howchangesinantisdsequenceswouldaffectsdsequencesinescherichiacoliandbacillussubtilis