Cargando…
How Changes in Anti-SD Sequences Would Affect SD Sequences in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis
The 3′ end of the small ribosomal RNAs (ssu rRNA) in bacteria is directly involved in the selection and binding of mRNA transcripts during translation initiation via well-documented interactions between a Shine-Dalgarno (SD) sequence located upstream of the initiation codon and an anti-SD (aSD) sequ...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Genetics Society of America
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5427494/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28364038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.117.039305 |
_version_ | 1783235636944175104 |
---|---|
author | Abolbaghaei, Akram Silke, Jordan R. Xia, Xuhua |
author_facet | Abolbaghaei, Akram Silke, Jordan R. Xia, Xuhua |
author_sort | Abolbaghaei, Akram |
collection | PubMed |
description | The 3′ end of the small ribosomal RNAs (ssu rRNA) in bacteria is directly involved in the selection and binding of mRNA transcripts during translation initiation via well-documented interactions between a Shine-Dalgarno (SD) sequence located upstream of the initiation codon and an anti-SD (aSD) sequence at the 3′ end of the ssu rRNA. Consequently, the 3′ end of ssu rRNA (3′TAIL) is strongly conserved among bacterial species because a change in the region may impact the translation of many protein-coding genes. Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis differ in their 3′ ends of ssu rRNA, being GAUCACCUCCUUA3′ in E. coli and GAUCACCUCCUUUCU3′ or GAUCACCUCCUUUCUA3′ in B. subtilis. Such differences in 3′TAIL lead to species-specific SDs (designated SD(Ec) for E. coli and SD(Bs) for B. subtilis) that can form strong and well-positioned SD/aSD pairing in one species but not in the other. Selection mediated by the species-specific 3′TAIL is expected to favor SD(Bs) against SD(Ec) in B. subtilis, but favor SD(Ec) against SD(Bs) in E. coli. Among well-positioned SDs, SD(Ec) is used more in E. coli than in B. subtilis, and SD(Bs) more in B. subtilis than in E. coli. Highly expressed genes and genes of high translation efficiency tend to have longer SDs than lowly expressed genes and genes with low translation efficiency in both species, but more so in B. subtilis than in E. coli. Both species overuse SDs matching the bolded part of the 3′TAIL shown above. The 3′TAIL difference contributes to the host specificity of phages. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5427494 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Genetics Society of America |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54274942017-05-12 How Changes in Anti-SD Sequences Would Affect SD Sequences in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis Abolbaghaei, Akram Silke, Jordan R. Xia, Xuhua G3 (Bethesda) Investigations The 3′ end of the small ribosomal RNAs (ssu rRNA) in bacteria is directly involved in the selection and binding of mRNA transcripts during translation initiation via well-documented interactions between a Shine-Dalgarno (SD) sequence located upstream of the initiation codon and an anti-SD (aSD) sequence at the 3′ end of the ssu rRNA. Consequently, the 3′ end of ssu rRNA (3′TAIL) is strongly conserved among bacterial species because a change in the region may impact the translation of many protein-coding genes. Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis differ in their 3′ ends of ssu rRNA, being GAUCACCUCCUUA3′ in E. coli and GAUCACCUCCUUUCU3′ or GAUCACCUCCUUUCUA3′ in B. subtilis. Such differences in 3′TAIL lead to species-specific SDs (designated SD(Ec) for E. coli and SD(Bs) for B. subtilis) that can form strong and well-positioned SD/aSD pairing in one species but not in the other. Selection mediated by the species-specific 3′TAIL is expected to favor SD(Bs) against SD(Ec) in B. subtilis, but favor SD(Ec) against SD(Bs) in E. coli. Among well-positioned SDs, SD(Ec) is used more in E. coli than in B. subtilis, and SD(Bs) more in B. subtilis than in E. coli. Highly expressed genes and genes of high translation efficiency tend to have longer SDs than lowly expressed genes and genes with low translation efficiency in both species, but more so in B. subtilis than in E. coli. Both species overuse SDs matching the bolded part of the 3′TAIL shown above. The 3′TAIL difference contributes to the host specificity of phages. Genetics Society of America 2017-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5427494/ /pubmed/28364038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.117.039305 Text en Copyright © 2017 Abolbaghaei et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Investigations Abolbaghaei, Akram Silke, Jordan R. Xia, Xuhua How Changes in Anti-SD Sequences Would Affect SD Sequences in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis |
title | How Changes in Anti-SD Sequences Would Affect SD Sequences in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis |
title_full | How Changes in Anti-SD Sequences Would Affect SD Sequences in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis |
title_fullStr | How Changes in Anti-SD Sequences Would Affect SD Sequences in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis |
title_full_unstemmed | How Changes in Anti-SD Sequences Would Affect SD Sequences in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis |
title_short | How Changes in Anti-SD Sequences Would Affect SD Sequences in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis |
title_sort | how changes in anti-sd sequences would affect sd sequences in escherichia coli and bacillus subtilis |
topic | Investigations |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5427494/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28364038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.117.039305 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abolbaghaeiakram howchangesinantisdsequenceswouldaffectsdsequencesinescherichiacoliandbacillussubtilis AT silkejordanr howchangesinantisdsequenceswouldaffectsdsequencesinescherichiacoliandbacillussubtilis AT xiaxuhua howchangesinantisdsequenceswouldaffectsdsequencesinescherichiacoliandbacillussubtilis |