Cargando…

Evidence for a Priori Existence of Attentional Bias Subgroups in Emotional Processing of Aversive Stimuli

Little is known regarding inter-individual differences in attentional biases for pain-related information; more knowledge is crucial, since these biases have been associated with differences in pain processing as well as in predicting the risk of postoperative pain. The present study investigated EE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Heck, Casper H., Oosterman, Joukje M., de Kleijn, Kim M. A., Jongsma, Marijtje L. A., van Rijn, Clementina M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5427543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28553210
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00087
_version_ 1783235648548765696
author van Heck, Casper H.
Oosterman, Joukje M.
de Kleijn, Kim M. A.
Jongsma, Marijtje L. A.
van Rijn, Clementina M.
author_facet van Heck, Casper H.
Oosterman, Joukje M.
de Kleijn, Kim M. A.
Jongsma, Marijtje L. A.
van Rijn, Clementina M.
author_sort van Heck, Casper H.
collection PubMed
description Little is known regarding inter-individual differences in attentional biases for pain-related information; more knowledge is crucial, since these biases have been associated with differences in pain processing as well as in predicting the risk of postoperative pain. The present study investigated EEG correlates of attentional bias patterns for pain-related information, with specific focus on avoidance- and vigilance-like behavior. Forty-one participants performed a dot-probe task, where neutral and pain-related words were used to create neutral, congruent, incongruent, and double (two pain-related words) trials. EEG was recorded, which was used to generate ERP's of the word-processing phase and the post-dot phase. Participants were placed in two subgroups based on the direction of their attentional bias (either positive; toward the pain-related words, or negative; away from pain-related words). Using t-profiles, four latency windows were identified on which the two subgroups differed significantly. These latency windows yield areas which correspond with the P1-N1 domain and the P3b for the word-processing phase, while the post-dot phase latency windows cover the areas of the P200 and the P3b. The two subgroups show differences on congruent, incongruent, and the double trials, but interestingly also on the neutral trials. Most notably, the area in the word-phase associated with the P3b is diminished in the subgroup showing a negative bias. The deflections associated with both early and late attentional components, including the P3B, as well as a positive deflection in the timeframe of proposed response evaluation processes differ significantly between subgroups. In this study we demonstrated that different attentional biases exist in the healthy population, by showing differences in ERP's. We also show differences in processing neutral trials, which suggests there are fundamental differences between these groups in processing words in general.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5427543
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54275432017-05-26 Evidence for a Priori Existence of Attentional Bias Subgroups in Emotional Processing of Aversive Stimuli van Heck, Casper H. Oosterman, Joukje M. de Kleijn, Kim M. A. Jongsma, Marijtje L. A. van Rijn, Clementina M. Front Behav Neurosci Neuroscience Little is known regarding inter-individual differences in attentional biases for pain-related information; more knowledge is crucial, since these biases have been associated with differences in pain processing as well as in predicting the risk of postoperative pain. The present study investigated EEG correlates of attentional bias patterns for pain-related information, with specific focus on avoidance- and vigilance-like behavior. Forty-one participants performed a dot-probe task, where neutral and pain-related words were used to create neutral, congruent, incongruent, and double (two pain-related words) trials. EEG was recorded, which was used to generate ERP's of the word-processing phase and the post-dot phase. Participants were placed in two subgroups based on the direction of their attentional bias (either positive; toward the pain-related words, or negative; away from pain-related words). Using t-profiles, four latency windows were identified on which the two subgroups differed significantly. These latency windows yield areas which correspond with the P1-N1 domain and the P3b for the word-processing phase, while the post-dot phase latency windows cover the areas of the P200 and the P3b. The two subgroups show differences on congruent, incongruent, and the double trials, but interestingly also on the neutral trials. Most notably, the area in the word-phase associated with the P3b is diminished in the subgroup showing a negative bias. The deflections associated with both early and late attentional components, including the P3B, as well as a positive deflection in the timeframe of proposed response evaluation processes differ significantly between subgroups. In this study we demonstrated that different attentional biases exist in the healthy population, by showing differences in ERP's. We also show differences in processing neutral trials, which suggests there are fundamental differences between these groups in processing words in general. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5427543/ /pubmed/28553210 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00087 Text en Copyright © 2017 van Heck, Oosterman, de Kleijn, Jongsma and van Rijn. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
van Heck, Casper H.
Oosterman, Joukje M.
de Kleijn, Kim M. A.
Jongsma, Marijtje L. A.
van Rijn, Clementina M.
Evidence for a Priori Existence of Attentional Bias Subgroups in Emotional Processing of Aversive Stimuli
title Evidence for a Priori Existence of Attentional Bias Subgroups in Emotional Processing of Aversive Stimuli
title_full Evidence for a Priori Existence of Attentional Bias Subgroups in Emotional Processing of Aversive Stimuli
title_fullStr Evidence for a Priori Existence of Attentional Bias Subgroups in Emotional Processing of Aversive Stimuli
title_full_unstemmed Evidence for a Priori Existence of Attentional Bias Subgroups in Emotional Processing of Aversive Stimuli
title_short Evidence for a Priori Existence of Attentional Bias Subgroups in Emotional Processing of Aversive Stimuli
title_sort evidence for a priori existence of attentional bias subgroups in emotional processing of aversive stimuli
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5427543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28553210
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00087
work_keys_str_mv AT vanheckcasperh evidenceforaprioriexistenceofattentionalbiassubgroupsinemotionalprocessingofaversivestimuli
AT oostermanjoukjem evidenceforaprioriexistenceofattentionalbiassubgroupsinemotionalprocessingofaversivestimuli
AT dekleijnkimma evidenceforaprioriexistenceofattentionalbiassubgroupsinemotionalprocessingofaversivestimuli
AT jongsmamarijtjela evidenceforaprioriexistenceofattentionalbiassubgroupsinemotionalprocessingofaversivestimuli
AT vanrijnclementinam evidenceforaprioriexistenceofattentionalbiassubgroupsinemotionalprocessingofaversivestimuli