Cargando…

Could cash and good parenting affect child cognitive development? A cross-sectional study in South Africa and Malawi

BACKGROUND: Social protection interventions, including cash grants and care provision have been shown to effectively reduce some negative impacts of the HIV epidemic on adolescents and families. Less is known about the role of social protection on younger HIV affected populations. This study explore...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sherr, Lorraine, Macedo, Ana, Tomlinson, Mark, Skeen, Sarah, Cluver, Lucie Dale
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5427556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28499423
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-017-0883-z
_version_ 1783235651924131840
author Sherr, Lorraine
Macedo, Ana
Tomlinson, Mark
Skeen, Sarah
Cluver, Lucie Dale
author_facet Sherr, Lorraine
Macedo, Ana
Tomlinson, Mark
Skeen, Sarah
Cluver, Lucie Dale
author_sort Sherr, Lorraine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Social protection interventions, including cash grants and care provision have been shown to effectively reduce some negative impacts of the HIV epidemic on adolescents and families. Less is known about the role of social protection on younger HIV affected populations. This study explored the impact of cash grants on children’s cognitive development. Additionally, we examined whether combined cash and care (operationalised as good parenting) was associated with improved cognitive outcomes. METHODS: The sample included 854 children, aged 5 – 15, participating in community-based organisation (CBO) programmes for children affected by HIV in South Africa and Malawi. Data on child cognitive functioning were gathered by a combination of caregiver report and observer administered tests. Primary caregivers also reported on the economic situation of the family, cash receipt into the home, child and household HIV status. Parenting was measured on a 10 item scale with good parenting defined as a score of 8 or above. RESULTS: About half of families received cash (55%, n = 473), only 6% (n = 51) reported good parenting above the cut-off point but no cash, 18% (n = 151) received combined cash support and reported good parenting, and 21% (n = 179) had neither. Findings show that cash receipt was associated with enhanced child cognitive outcomes in a number of domains including verbal working memory, general cognitive functioning, and learning. Furthermore, cash plus good parenting provided an additive effect. Child HIV status had a moderating effect on the association between cash or/plus good parenting and cognitive outcomes. The association between cash and good parenting and child cognitive outcomes remained significant among both HIV positive and negative children, but overall the HIV negative group benefited more. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the importance of cash transfers and good parenting on cognitive development of young children living in HIV affected environments. Our data clearly indicate that combined provision (cash plus good parenting) have added value.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5427556
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54275562017-05-15 Could cash and good parenting affect child cognitive development? A cross-sectional study in South Africa and Malawi Sherr, Lorraine Macedo, Ana Tomlinson, Mark Skeen, Sarah Cluver, Lucie Dale BMC Pediatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Social protection interventions, including cash grants and care provision have been shown to effectively reduce some negative impacts of the HIV epidemic on adolescents and families. Less is known about the role of social protection on younger HIV affected populations. This study explored the impact of cash grants on children’s cognitive development. Additionally, we examined whether combined cash and care (operationalised as good parenting) was associated with improved cognitive outcomes. METHODS: The sample included 854 children, aged 5 – 15, participating in community-based organisation (CBO) programmes for children affected by HIV in South Africa and Malawi. Data on child cognitive functioning were gathered by a combination of caregiver report and observer administered tests. Primary caregivers also reported on the economic situation of the family, cash receipt into the home, child and household HIV status. Parenting was measured on a 10 item scale with good parenting defined as a score of 8 or above. RESULTS: About half of families received cash (55%, n = 473), only 6% (n = 51) reported good parenting above the cut-off point but no cash, 18% (n = 151) received combined cash support and reported good parenting, and 21% (n = 179) had neither. Findings show that cash receipt was associated with enhanced child cognitive outcomes in a number of domains including verbal working memory, general cognitive functioning, and learning. Furthermore, cash plus good parenting provided an additive effect. Child HIV status had a moderating effect on the association between cash or/plus good parenting and cognitive outcomes. The association between cash and good parenting and child cognitive outcomes remained significant among both HIV positive and negative children, but overall the HIV negative group benefited more. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the importance of cash transfers and good parenting on cognitive development of young children living in HIV affected environments. Our data clearly indicate that combined provision (cash plus good parenting) have added value. BioMed Central 2017-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5427556/ /pubmed/28499423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-017-0883-z Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sherr, Lorraine
Macedo, Ana
Tomlinson, Mark
Skeen, Sarah
Cluver, Lucie Dale
Could cash and good parenting affect child cognitive development? A cross-sectional study in South Africa and Malawi
title Could cash and good parenting affect child cognitive development? A cross-sectional study in South Africa and Malawi
title_full Could cash and good parenting affect child cognitive development? A cross-sectional study in South Africa and Malawi
title_fullStr Could cash and good parenting affect child cognitive development? A cross-sectional study in South Africa and Malawi
title_full_unstemmed Could cash and good parenting affect child cognitive development? A cross-sectional study in South Africa and Malawi
title_short Could cash and good parenting affect child cognitive development? A cross-sectional study in South Africa and Malawi
title_sort could cash and good parenting affect child cognitive development? a cross-sectional study in south africa and malawi
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5427556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28499423
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-017-0883-z
work_keys_str_mv AT sherrlorraine couldcashandgoodparentingaffectchildcognitivedevelopmentacrosssectionalstudyinsouthafricaandmalawi
AT macedoana couldcashandgoodparentingaffectchildcognitivedevelopmentacrosssectionalstudyinsouthafricaandmalawi
AT tomlinsonmark couldcashandgoodparentingaffectchildcognitivedevelopmentacrosssectionalstudyinsouthafricaandmalawi
AT skeensarah couldcashandgoodparentingaffectchildcognitivedevelopmentacrosssectionalstudyinsouthafricaandmalawi
AT cluverluciedale couldcashandgoodparentingaffectchildcognitivedevelopmentacrosssectionalstudyinsouthafricaandmalawi