Cargando…

Use of Proviral DNA to Investigate Virus Resistance Mutations in HIV-infected Zimbabweans

BACKGROUND: Antiretroviral therapy (ART) to suppress HIV replication has reduced morbidity and mortality yet effectiveness of current HIV drugs is threatened by HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) mutations. OBJECTIVE: To determine HIVDR mutations using proviral DNA from specimens of patients presenting to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Musingwini, Tutsirai V., Zhou, Danai T., Mhandire, Doreen, Duri, Kerina, Gomo, Exnevia, Oktedalen, Olav, Chimukangara, Benjamin, Shamu, Tinei, Shawarira-Bote, Sandra, Dandara, Collet, Stray-Pedersen, Babill
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Open 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5427698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28553415
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874285801711010045
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Antiretroviral therapy (ART) to suppress HIV replication has reduced morbidity and mortality yet effectiveness of current HIV drugs is threatened by HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) mutations. OBJECTIVE: To determine HIVDR mutations using proviral DNA from specimens of patients presenting to an HIV treatment clinic. METHODS: DNA from 103 patients, 86 treatment-experienced, 17 treatment-naïve, were genotyped for the HIV-1C reverse transcriptase gene (RT; codons 21-304) using Sanger sequencing and sequences analyzed using Sequencher software. Resistance mutations were interpreted using Stanford HIVDR reference database. RESULTS: Median age was 39 (IQR, 33-46) years and 80% of patients were female. Six-percent (n=6) had at least one HIVDR mutation, comprising NRTI-associated mutations, (M184V, T69D, T69N and V75I); NNRTI-associated mutations (G190A, K103N, V106M, Y181C) and thymidine analogue associated mutations (D67N, K70R, K219Q, L210W, M41L, T215Y). Of the six participants, with at least one HIVDR mutation, all were treatment experienced, five were on tenofovir, lamivudine and nevirapine and one was on tenofovir, lamivudine and atazanavir. There was no difference in median CD4 count and viral loads when patients were compared by presence of HIVDR mutations. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated the use of proviral DNA in HIVDR testing in adult patients and present that all the patients with various kinds of HIVDR mutations were treatment experienced, pointing to the role of drug regimens in driving viral mutations. Thus, the use of proviral DNA has potential to help provide surveillance on risk of HIVDR in HIV-infected individuals who are on treatment, which may assist in corrective treatment.