Cargando…

Comparison of the patient and partner satisfaction with 700CX and Titan penile prostheses

Most widespread three-component penile prosthesis models are 700CX(™) and Titan(®). Our purpose is to assess patient and partner satisfaction after the first implant. This is a multicenter, retrospective, nonrandomized study in which all patients who met the inclusion criteria between 2009 and 2013...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Otero, Javier Romero, Cruz, César Rojas, Gómez, Borja García, Geli, Joaquim Sarquella, Polo, Jose Medina, Castañé, Eduard Ruiz, Antolín, Alfredo Rodríguez
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5427788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26806085
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.172822
_version_ 1783235694154481664
author Otero, Javier Romero
Cruz, César Rojas
Gómez, Borja García
Geli, Joaquim Sarquella
Polo, Jose Medina
Castañé, Eduard Ruiz
Antolín, Alfredo Rodríguez
author_facet Otero, Javier Romero
Cruz, César Rojas
Gómez, Borja García
Geli, Joaquim Sarquella
Polo, Jose Medina
Castañé, Eduard Ruiz
Antolín, Alfredo Rodríguez
author_sort Otero, Javier Romero
collection PubMed
description Most widespread three-component penile prosthesis models are 700CX(™) and Titan(®). Our purpose is to assess patient and partner satisfaction after the first implant. This is a multicenter, retrospective, nonrandomized study in which all patients who met the inclusion criteria between 2009 and 2013 were included. In total, 248 patients agreed to participate. To evaluate patient satisfaction, a validated but modified 11-question questionnaire was completed (EDITS); and a nonvalidated two-item questionnaire was given to the partner. Statistical analysis used an ordinal logistic regression model. Two hundred and forty-eight patients (194 with 700CX(™) vs 54 with Titan(®)) and 207 couples completed the questionnaire (165 with 700CX(™) vs 42 with Titan(®)). Overall satisfaction was high. Both showed great reliability for sexual intercourse and high compliance with prior expectations. Most patients were able to manage the penile prosthesis correctly within 6 months. Postoperative penile shortening led to some dissatisfaction in 42% and 46% of cases (700CX(™) /Titan(®)). Significant differences were found in three questions of patients’ questionnaire. There were more patients satisfied with the 700CX(™) (P = 0.0001). No patient with Titan(®) implant took longer than 6 months to optimal management. Only 4% of patients with 700CX(™) implant were dissatisfied with the deflation, in contrast to 24% with the Titan(®) (P = 0.0031). Of the two partners’ questions, one showed a statistically significant difference (P = 0.0026). It seems that group 700CX(™) would recommend to re-implant the prosthesis with a greater tendency. The overall satisfaction was very high for both prostheses. The final aspect of the erected and flaccid penis was satisfactory, but both groups showed significant discontent with its final size. Partners’ overall satisfaction was high.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5427788
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54277882017-05-26 Comparison of the patient and partner satisfaction with 700CX and Titan penile prostheses Otero, Javier Romero Cruz, César Rojas Gómez, Borja García Geli, Joaquim Sarquella Polo, Jose Medina Castañé, Eduard Ruiz Antolín, Alfredo Rodríguez Asian J Androl Original Article Most widespread three-component penile prosthesis models are 700CX(™) and Titan(®). Our purpose is to assess patient and partner satisfaction after the first implant. This is a multicenter, retrospective, nonrandomized study in which all patients who met the inclusion criteria between 2009 and 2013 were included. In total, 248 patients agreed to participate. To evaluate patient satisfaction, a validated but modified 11-question questionnaire was completed (EDITS); and a nonvalidated two-item questionnaire was given to the partner. Statistical analysis used an ordinal logistic regression model. Two hundred and forty-eight patients (194 with 700CX(™) vs 54 with Titan(®)) and 207 couples completed the questionnaire (165 with 700CX(™) vs 42 with Titan(®)). Overall satisfaction was high. Both showed great reliability for sexual intercourse and high compliance with prior expectations. Most patients were able to manage the penile prosthesis correctly within 6 months. Postoperative penile shortening led to some dissatisfaction in 42% and 46% of cases (700CX(™) /Titan(®)). Significant differences were found in three questions of patients’ questionnaire. There were more patients satisfied with the 700CX(™) (P = 0.0001). No patient with Titan(®) implant took longer than 6 months to optimal management. Only 4% of patients with 700CX(™) implant were dissatisfied with the deflation, in contrast to 24% with the Titan(®) (P = 0.0031). Of the two partners’ questions, one showed a statistically significant difference (P = 0.0026). It seems that group 700CX(™) would recommend to re-implant the prosthesis with a greater tendency. The overall satisfaction was very high for both prostheses. The final aspect of the erected and flaccid penis was satisfactory, but both groups showed significant discontent with its final size. Partners’ overall satisfaction was high. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 2016-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5427788/ /pubmed/26806085 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.172822 Text en Copyright: © The Author(s)(2017) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Otero, Javier Romero
Cruz, César Rojas
Gómez, Borja García
Geli, Joaquim Sarquella
Polo, Jose Medina
Castañé, Eduard Ruiz
Antolín, Alfredo Rodríguez
Comparison of the patient and partner satisfaction with 700CX and Titan penile prostheses
title Comparison of the patient and partner satisfaction with 700CX and Titan penile prostheses
title_full Comparison of the patient and partner satisfaction with 700CX and Titan penile prostheses
title_fullStr Comparison of the patient and partner satisfaction with 700CX and Titan penile prostheses
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the patient and partner satisfaction with 700CX and Titan penile prostheses
title_short Comparison of the patient and partner satisfaction with 700CX and Titan penile prostheses
title_sort comparison of the patient and partner satisfaction with 700cx and titan penile prostheses
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5427788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26806085
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.172822
work_keys_str_mv AT oterojavierromero comparisonofthepatientandpartnersatisfactionwith700cxandtitanpenileprostheses
AT cruzcesarrojas comparisonofthepatientandpartnersatisfactionwith700cxandtitanpenileprostheses
AT gomezborjagarcia comparisonofthepatientandpartnersatisfactionwith700cxandtitanpenileprostheses
AT gelijoaquimsarquella comparisonofthepatientandpartnersatisfactionwith700cxandtitanpenileprostheses
AT polojosemedina comparisonofthepatientandpartnersatisfactionwith700cxandtitanpenileprostheses
AT castaneeduardruiz comparisonofthepatientandpartnersatisfactionwith700cxandtitanpenileprostheses
AT antolinalfredorodriguez comparisonofthepatientandpartnersatisfactionwith700cxandtitanpenileprostheses