Cargando…

Prosocial Orientation Alters Network Dynamics and Fosters Cooperation

Dynamic networks have been shown to increase cooperation, but prior findings are compatible with two different mechanisms for the evolution of cooperation. It may be that dynamic networks promote cooperation even in networks composed entirely of egoists, who strategically cooperate to attract and ma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Melamed, David, Simpson, Brent, Harrell, Ashley
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5427964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28336925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00265-x
_version_ 1783235730070306816
author Melamed, David
Simpson, Brent
Harrell, Ashley
author_facet Melamed, David
Simpson, Brent
Harrell, Ashley
author_sort Melamed, David
collection PubMed
description Dynamic networks have been shown to increase cooperation, but prior findings are compatible with two different mechanisms for the evolution of cooperation. It may be that dynamic networks promote cooperation even in networks composed entirely of egoists, who strategically cooperate to attract and maintain profitable interaction partners. Alternatively, drawing on recent insights into heterogeneous social preferences, we expect that dynamic networks will increase cooperation only when nodes are occupied by persons with more prosocial preferences, who tend to attract and keep more cooperative partners relative to egoists. Our experiment used a standard procedure to classify participants a priori as egoistic or prosocial and then embedded them in homogeneous networks of all prosocials or all egoists, or in heterogeneous networks (50/50). Participants then interacted in repeated prisoner's dilemma games with alters in both static and dynamic networks. In both heterogeneous and homogeneous networks, we find dynamic networks only promote cooperation among prosocials. Resulting from their greater cooperation, prosocials’ relations are more stable, yielding substantially higher fitness compared to egoists in both heterogeneous and homogeneous dynamic networks. Our results suggest that a key to the evolution and stability of cooperation is the ability of those with prosocial preferences to alter their networks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5427964
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54279642017-05-15 Prosocial Orientation Alters Network Dynamics and Fosters Cooperation Melamed, David Simpson, Brent Harrell, Ashley Sci Rep Article Dynamic networks have been shown to increase cooperation, but prior findings are compatible with two different mechanisms for the evolution of cooperation. It may be that dynamic networks promote cooperation even in networks composed entirely of egoists, who strategically cooperate to attract and maintain profitable interaction partners. Alternatively, drawing on recent insights into heterogeneous social preferences, we expect that dynamic networks will increase cooperation only when nodes are occupied by persons with more prosocial preferences, who tend to attract and keep more cooperative partners relative to egoists. Our experiment used a standard procedure to classify participants a priori as egoistic or prosocial and then embedded them in homogeneous networks of all prosocials or all egoists, or in heterogeneous networks (50/50). Participants then interacted in repeated prisoner's dilemma games with alters in both static and dynamic networks. In both heterogeneous and homogeneous networks, we find dynamic networks only promote cooperation among prosocials. Resulting from their greater cooperation, prosocials’ relations are more stable, yielding substantially higher fitness compared to egoists in both heterogeneous and homogeneous dynamic networks. Our results suggest that a key to the evolution and stability of cooperation is the ability of those with prosocial preferences to alter their networks. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5427964/ /pubmed/28336925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00265-x Text en © The Author(s) 2017 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Melamed, David
Simpson, Brent
Harrell, Ashley
Prosocial Orientation Alters Network Dynamics and Fosters Cooperation
title Prosocial Orientation Alters Network Dynamics and Fosters Cooperation
title_full Prosocial Orientation Alters Network Dynamics and Fosters Cooperation
title_fullStr Prosocial Orientation Alters Network Dynamics and Fosters Cooperation
title_full_unstemmed Prosocial Orientation Alters Network Dynamics and Fosters Cooperation
title_short Prosocial Orientation Alters Network Dynamics and Fosters Cooperation
title_sort prosocial orientation alters network dynamics and fosters cooperation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5427964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28336925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00265-x
work_keys_str_mv AT melameddavid prosocialorientationaltersnetworkdynamicsandfosterscooperation
AT simpsonbrent prosocialorientationaltersnetworkdynamicsandfosterscooperation
AT harrellashley prosocialorientationaltersnetworkdynamicsandfosterscooperation