Cargando…
Optimized Mass Spectrometry Analysis Workflow with Polarimetric Guidance for ex vivo and in situ Sampling of Biological Tissues
Spatially Targeted Mass Spectrometry (MS) analysis using survey scans with an imaging modality often requires consecutive tissue slices, because of the tissue damage during survey scan or due to incompatible sample preparation requirements between the survey modality and MS. We report two spatially...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5428042/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28352074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00272-y |
_version_ | 1783235750286852096 |
---|---|
author | Woolman, Michael Gribble, Adam Bluemke, Emma Zou, Jing Ventura, Manuela Bernards, Nicholas Wu, Megan Ginsberg, Howard J. Das, Sunit Vitkin, Alex Zarrine-Afsar, Arash |
author_facet | Woolman, Michael Gribble, Adam Bluemke, Emma Zou, Jing Ventura, Manuela Bernards, Nicholas Wu, Megan Ginsberg, Howard J. Das, Sunit Vitkin, Alex Zarrine-Afsar, Arash |
author_sort | Woolman, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | Spatially Targeted Mass Spectrometry (MS) analysis using survey scans with an imaging modality often requires consecutive tissue slices, because of the tissue damage during survey scan or due to incompatible sample preparation requirements between the survey modality and MS. We report two spatially targeted MS analysis workflows based on polarized light imaging guidance that use the same tissue sample for survey and targeted analysis. The first workflow is applicable for thin-slice analysis, and uses transmission-polarimetry-guided Desorption ElectroSpray Ionization Mass Spectrometry (DESI-MS), and confirmatory H&E histopathology analysis on the same slice; this is validated using quantitative digital pathology methods. The second workflow explores a polarimetry-guided MS platform for thick tissue assessment by developing reflection-mode polarimetric imaging coupled with a hand-held Picosecond InfraRed Laser (PIRL) MS ablation probe that requires minimal tissue removal to produce detectable signal. Tissue differentiation within 5–10 s of sampling with the hand-held probe is shown using multivariate statistical methods of the MS profiles. Both workflows were tasked with differentiating necrotic cancer sites from viable cancers using a breast tumour model, and their performance was evaluated. The use of the same tissue surface addresses mismatches in guidance due to intrinsic changes in tissue morphology over consecutive sections. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5428042 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54280422017-05-15 Optimized Mass Spectrometry Analysis Workflow with Polarimetric Guidance for ex vivo and in situ Sampling of Biological Tissues Woolman, Michael Gribble, Adam Bluemke, Emma Zou, Jing Ventura, Manuela Bernards, Nicholas Wu, Megan Ginsberg, Howard J. Das, Sunit Vitkin, Alex Zarrine-Afsar, Arash Sci Rep Article Spatially Targeted Mass Spectrometry (MS) analysis using survey scans with an imaging modality often requires consecutive tissue slices, because of the tissue damage during survey scan or due to incompatible sample preparation requirements between the survey modality and MS. We report two spatially targeted MS analysis workflows based on polarized light imaging guidance that use the same tissue sample for survey and targeted analysis. The first workflow is applicable for thin-slice analysis, and uses transmission-polarimetry-guided Desorption ElectroSpray Ionization Mass Spectrometry (DESI-MS), and confirmatory H&E histopathology analysis on the same slice; this is validated using quantitative digital pathology methods. The second workflow explores a polarimetry-guided MS platform for thick tissue assessment by developing reflection-mode polarimetric imaging coupled with a hand-held Picosecond InfraRed Laser (PIRL) MS ablation probe that requires minimal tissue removal to produce detectable signal. Tissue differentiation within 5–10 s of sampling with the hand-held probe is shown using multivariate statistical methods of the MS profiles. Both workflows were tasked with differentiating necrotic cancer sites from viable cancers using a breast tumour model, and their performance was evaluated. The use of the same tissue surface addresses mismatches in guidance due to intrinsic changes in tissue morphology over consecutive sections. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5428042/ /pubmed/28352074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00272-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Woolman, Michael Gribble, Adam Bluemke, Emma Zou, Jing Ventura, Manuela Bernards, Nicholas Wu, Megan Ginsberg, Howard J. Das, Sunit Vitkin, Alex Zarrine-Afsar, Arash Optimized Mass Spectrometry Analysis Workflow with Polarimetric Guidance for ex vivo and in situ Sampling of Biological Tissues |
title | Optimized Mass Spectrometry Analysis Workflow with Polarimetric Guidance for ex vivo and in situ Sampling of Biological Tissues |
title_full | Optimized Mass Spectrometry Analysis Workflow with Polarimetric Guidance for ex vivo and in situ Sampling of Biological Tissues |
title_fullStr | Optimized Mass Spectrometry Analysis Workflow with Polarimetric Guidance for ex vivo and in situ Sampling of Biological Tissues |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimized Mass Spectrometry Analysis Workflow with Polarimetric Guidance for ex vivo and in situ Sampling of Biological Tissues |
title_short | Optimized Mass Spectrometry Analysis Workflow with Polarimetric Guidance for ex vivo and in situ Sampling of Biological Tissues |
title_sort | optimized mass spectrometry analysis workflow with polarimetric guidance for ex vivo and in situ sampling of biological tissues |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5428042/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28352074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00272-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT woolmanmichael optimizedmassspectrometryanalysisworkflowwithpolarimetricguidanceforexvivoandinsitusamplingofbiologicaltissues AT gribbleadam optimizedmassspectrometryanalysisworkflowwithpolarimetricguidanceforexvivoandinsitusamplingofbiologicaltissues AT bluemkeemma optimizedmassspectrometryanalysisworkflowwithpolarimetricguidanceforexvivoandinsitusamplingofbiologicaltissues AT zoujing optimizedmassspectrometryanalysisworkflowwithpolarimetricguidanceforexvivoandinsitusamplingofbiologicaltissues AT venturamanuela optimizedmassspectrometryanalysisworkflowwithpolarimetricguidanceforexvivoandinsitusamplingofbiologicaltissues AT bernardsnicholas optimizedmassspectrometryanalysisworkflowwithpolarimetricguidanceforexvivoandinsitusamplingofbiologicaltissues AT wumegan optimizedmassspectrometryanalysisworkflowwithpolarimetricguidanceforexvivoandinsitusamplingofbiologicaltissues AT ginsberghowardj optimizedmassspectrometryanalysisworkflowwithpolarimetricguidanceforexvivoandinsitusamplingofbiologicaltissues AT dassunit optimizedmassspectrometryanalysisworkflowwithpolarimetricguidanceforexvivoandinsitusamplingofbiologicaltissues AT vitkinalex optimizedmassspectrometryanalysisworkflowwithpolarimetricguidanceforexvivoandinsitusamplingofbiologicaltissues AT zarrineafsararash optimizedmassspectrometryanalysisworkflowwithpolarimetricguidanceforexvivoandinsitusamplingofbiologicaltissues |