Cargando…
White Matter and Gray Matter Segmentation in 4D Computed Tomography
Modern Computed Tomography (CT) scanners are capable of acquiring contrast dynamics of the whole brain, adding functional to anatomical information. Soft tissue segmentation is important for subsequent applications such as tissue dependent perfusion analysis and automated detection and quantificatio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5428067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28273920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00239-z |
_version_ | 1783235756556288000 |
---|---|
author | Manniesing, Rashindra Oei, Marcel T. H. Oostveen, Luuk J. Melendez, Jaime Smit, Ewoud J. Platel, Bram Sánchez, Clara I. Meijer, Frederick J. A. Prokop, Mathias van Ginneken, Bram |
author_facet | Manniesing, Rashindra Oei, Marcel T. H. Oostveen, Luuk J. Melendez, Jaime Smit, Ewoud J. Platel, Bram Sánchez, Clara I. Meijer, Frederick J. A. Prokop, Mathias van Ginneken, Bram |
author_sort | Manniesing, Rashindra |
collection | PubMed |
description | Modern Computed Tomography (CT) scanners are capable of acquiring contrast dynamics of the whole brain, adding functional to anatomical information. Soft tissue segmentation is important for subsequent applications such as tissue dependent perfusion analysis and automated detection and quantification of cerebral pathology. In this work a method is presented to automatically segment white matter (WM) and gray matter (GM) in contrast- enhanced 4D CT images of the brain. The method starts with intracranial segmentation via atlas registration, followed by a refinement using a geodesic active contour with dominating advection term steered by image gradient information, from a 3D temporal average image optimally weighted according to the exposures of the individual time points of the 4D CT acquisition. Next, three groups of voxel features are extracted: intensity, contextual, and temporal. These are used to segment WM and GM with a support vector machine. Performance was assessed using cross validation in a leave-one-patient-out manner on 22 patients. Dice coefficients were 0.81 ± 0.04 and 0.79 ± 0.05, 95% Hausdorff distances were 3.86 ± 1.43 and 3.07 ± 1.72 mm, for WM and GM, respectively. Thus, WM and GM segmentation is feasible in 4D CT with good accuracy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5428067 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54280672017-05-15 White Matter and Gray Matter Segmentation in 4D Computed Tomography Manniesing, Rashindra Oei, Marcel T. H. Oostveen, Luuk J. Melendez, Jaime Smit, Ewoud J. Platel, Bram Sánchez, Clara I. Meijer, Frederick J. A. Prokop, Mathias van Ginneken, Bram Sci Rep Article Modern Computed Tomography (CT) scanners are capable of acquiring contrast dynamics of the whole brain, adding functional to anatomical information. Soft tissue segmentation is important for subsequent applications such as tissue dependent perfusion analysis and automated detection and quantification of cerebral pathology. In this work a method is presented to automatically segment white matter (WM) and gray matter (GM) in contrast- enhanced 4D CT images of the brain. The method starts with intracranial segmentation via atlas registration, followed by a refinement using a geodesic active contour with dominating advection term steered by image gradient information, from a 3D temporal average image optimally weighted according to the exposures of the individual time points of the 4D CT acquisition. Next, three groups of voxel features are extracted: intensity, contextual, and temporal. These are used to segment WM and GM with a support vector machine. Performance was assessed using cross validation in a leave-one-patient-out manner on 22 patients. Dice coefficients were 0.81 ± 0.04 and 0.79 ± 0.05, 95% Hausdorff distances were 3.86 ± 1.43 and 3.07 ± 1.72 mm, for WM and GM, respectively. Thus, WM and GM segmentation is feasible in 4D CT with good accuracy. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5428067/ /pubmed/28273920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00239-z Text en © The Author(s) 2017 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Manniesing, Rashindra Oei, Marcel T. H. Oostveen, Luuk J. Melendez, Jaime Smit, Ewoud J. Platel, Bram Sánchez, Clara I. Meijer, Frederick J. A. Prokop, Mathias van Ginneken, Bram White Matter and Gray Matter Segmentation in 4D Computed Tomography |
title | White Matter and Gray Matter Segmentation in 4D Computed Tomography |
title_full | White Matter and Gray Matter Segmentation in 4D Computed Tomography |
title_fullStr | White Matter and Gray Matter Segmentation in 4D Computed Tomography |
title_full_unstemmed | White Matter and Gray Matter Segmentation in 4D Computed Tomography |
title_short | White Matter and Gray Matter Segmentation in 4D Computed Tomography |
title_sort | white matter and gray matter segmentation in 4d computed tomography |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5428067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28273920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00239-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT manniesingrashindra whitematterandgraymattersegmentationin4dcomputedtomography AT oeimarcelth whitematterandgraymattersegmentationin4dcomputedtomography AT oostveenluukj whitematterandgraymattersegmentationin4dcomputedtomography AT melendezjaime whitematterandgraymattersegmentationin4dcomputedtomography AT smitewoudj whitematterandgraymattersegmentationin4dcomputedtomography AT platelbram whitematterandgraymattersegmentationin4dcomputedtomography AT sanchezclarai whitematterandgraymattersegmentationin4dcomputedtomography AT meijerfrederickja whitematterandgraymattersegmentationin4dcomputedtomography AT prokopmathias whitematterandgraymattersegmentationin4dcomputedtomography AT vanginnekenbram whitematterandgraymattersegmentationin4dcomputedtomography |