Cargando…

The Impact of Injector-Based Contrast Agent Administration on Bolus Shape and Magnetic Resonance Angiography Image Quality

OBJECTIVE: To compare injector-based contrast agent (CA) administration with hand injection in magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). METHODS: Gadobutrol was administered in 6 minipigs with 3 protocols: (a) hand injection (one senior technician), (b) hand injection (6 less-experienced technicians), a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jost, Gregor, Endrikat, Jan, Pietsch, Hubertus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5428122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28579796
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1178623x17705894
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To compare injector-based contrast agent (CA) administration with hand injection in magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). METHODS: Gadobutrol was administered in 6 minipigs with 3 protocols: (a) hand injection (one senior technician), (b) hand injection (6 less-experienced technicians), and (c) power injector administration. The arterial bolus shape was quantified by test bolus measurements. A head and neck MRA was performed for quantitative and qualitative comparison of signal enhancement. RESULTS: A significantly shorter time to peak was observed for protocol C, whereas no significant differences between protocols were found for peak height and bolus width. However, for protocol C, these parameters showed a much lower variation. The MRA revealed a significantly higher signal-to-noise ratio for injector-based administration. A superimposed strong contrast of the jugular vein was found in 50% of the hand injections. CONCLUSIONS: Injector-based CA administration results in a more standardized bolus shape, a higher vascular contrast, and a more robust visualization of target vessels.