Cargando…

An analysis of Echinacea chloroplast genomes: Implications for future botanical identification

Echinacea is a common botanical used in dietary supplements, primarily to treat upper respiratory tract infections and to support immune function. There are currently thought to be nine species in the genus Echinacea. Due to very low molecular divergence among sister species, traditional DNA barcodi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Ning, Erickson, David L., Ramachandran, Padmini, Ottesen, Andrea R., Timme, Ruth E., Funk, Vicki A., Luo, Yan, Handy, Sara M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5428300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28303008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00321-6
_version_ 1783235787562680320
author Zhang, Ning
Erickson, David L.
Ramachandran, Padmini
Ottesen, Andrea R.
Timme, Ruth E.
Funk, Vicki A.
Luo, Yan
Handy, Sara M.
author_facet Zhang, Ning
Erickson, David L.
Ramachandran, Padmini
Ottesen, Andrea R.
Timme, Ruth E.
Funk, Vicki A.
Luo, Yan
Handy, Sara M.
author_sort Zhang, Ning
collection PubMed
description Echinacea is a common botanical used in dietary supplements, primarily to treat upper respiratory tract infections and to support immune function. There are currently thought to be nine species in the genus Echinacea. Due to very low molecular divergence among sister species, traditional DNA barcoding has not been successful for differentiation of Echinacea species. Here, we present the use of full chloroplast genomes to distinguish between all 9 reported species. Total DNA was extracted from specimens stored at the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, which had been collected from the wild with species identification documented by experts in the field. We used Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) and CLC Genomics Workbench to assemble complete chloroplast genomes for all nine species. Full chloroplasts unambiguously differentiated all nine species, compared with the very few single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) available with core DNA barcoding markers. SNPs for any two Echinacea chloroplast genomes ranged from 181 to 910, and provided robust data for unambiguous species delimitation. Implications for DNA-based species identification assays derived from chloroplast genome sequences are discussed in light of product safety, adulteration and quality issues.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5428300
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54283002017-05-15 An analysis of Echinacea chloroplast genomes: Implications for future botanical identification Zhang, Ning Erickson, David L. Ramachandran, Padmini Ottesen, Andrea R. Timme, Ruth E. Funk, Vicki A. Luo, Yan Handy, Sara M. Sci Rep Article Echinacea is a common botanical used in dietary supplements, primarily to treat upper respiratory tract infections and to support immune function. There are currently thought to be nine species in the genus Echinacea. Due to very low molecular divergence among sister species, traditional DNA barcoding has not been successful for differentiation of Echinacea species. Here, we present the use of full chloroplast genomes to distinguish between all 9 reported species. Total DNA was extracted from specimens stored at the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, which had been collected from the wild with species identification documented by experts in the field. We used Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) and CLC Genomics Workbench to assemble complete chloroplast genomes for all nine species. Full chloroplasts unambiguously differentiated all nine species, compared with the very few single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) available with core DNA barcoding markers. SNPs for any two Echinacea chloroplast genomes ranged from 181 to 910, and provided robust data for unambiguous species delimitation. Implications for DNA-based species identification assays derived from chloroplast genome sequences are discussed in light of product safety, adulteration and quality issues. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5428300/ /pubmed/28303008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00321-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Zhang, Ning
Erickson, David L.
Ramachandran, Padmini
Ottesen, Andrea R.
Timme, Ruth E.
Funk, Vicki A.
Luo, Yan
Handy, Sara M.
An analysis of Echinacea chloroplast genomes: Implications for future botanical identification
title An analysis of Echinacea chloroplast genomes: Implications for future botanical identification
title_full An analysis of Echinacea chloroplast genomes: Implications for future botanical identification
title_fullStr An analysis of Echinacea chloroplast genomes: Implications for future botanical identification
title_full_unstemmed An analysis of Echinacea chloroplast genomes: Implications for future botanical identification
title_short An analysis of Echinacea chloroplast genomes: Implications for future botanical identification
title_sort analysis of echinacea chloroplast genomes: implications for future botanical identification
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5428300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28303008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00321-6
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangning ananalysisofechinaceachloroplastgenomesimplicationsforfuturebotanicalidentification
AT ericksondavidl ananalysisofechinaceachloroplastgenomesimplicationsforfuturebotanicalidentification
AT ramachandranpadmini ananalysisofechinaceachloroplastgenomesimplicationsforfuturebotanicalidentification
AT ottesenandrear ananalysisofechinaceachloroplastgenomesimplicationsforfuturebotanicalidentification
AT timmeruthe ananalysisofechinaceachloroplastgenomesimplicationsforfuturebotanicalidentification
AT funkvickia ananalysisofechinaceachloroplastgenomesimplicationsforfuturebotanicalidentification
AT luoyan ananalysisofechinaceachloroplastgenomesimplicationsforfuturebotanicalidentification
AT handysaram ananalysisofechinaceachloroplastgenomesimplicationsforfuturebotanicalidentification
AT zhangning analysisofechinaceachloroplastgenomesimplicationsforfuturebotanicalidentification
AT ericksondavidl analysisofechinaceachloroplastgenomesimplicationsforfuturebotanicalidentification
AT ramachandranpadmini analysisofechinaceachloroplastgenomesimplicationsforfuturebotanicalidentification
AT ottesenandrear analysisofechinaceachloroplastgenomesimplicationsforfuturebotanicalidentification
AT timmeruthe analysisofechinaceachloroplastgenomesimplicationsforfuturebotanicalidentification
AT funkvickia analysisofechinaceachloroplastgenomesimplicationsforfuturebotanicalidentification
AT luoyan analysisofechinaceachloroplastgenomesimplicationsforfuturebotanicalidentification
AT handysaram analysisofechinaceachloroplastgenomesimplicationsforfuturebotanicalidentification