Cargando…
An analysis of Echinacea chloroplast genomes: Implications for future botanical identification
Echinacea is a common botanical used in dietary supplements, primarily to treat upper respiratory tract infections and to support immune function. There are currently thought to be nine species in the genus Echinacea. Due to very low molecular divergence among sister species, traditional DNA barcodi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5428300/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28303008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00321-6 |
_version_ | 1783235787562680320 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Ning Erickson, David L. Ramachandran, Padmini Ottesen, Andrea R. Timme, Ruth E. Funk, Vicki A. Luo, Yan Handy, Sara M. |
author_facet | Zhang, Ning Erickson, David L. Ramachandran, Padmini Ottesen, Andrea R. Timme, Ruth E. Funk, Vicki A. Luo, Yan Handy, Sara M. |
author_sort | Zhang, Ning |
collection | PubMed |
description | Echinacea is a common botanical used in dietary supplements, primarily to treat upper respiratory tract infections and to support immune function. There are currently thought to be nine species in the genus Echinacea. Due to very low molecular divergence among sister species, traditional DNA barcoding has not been successful for differentiation of Echinacea species. Here, we present the use of full chloroplast genomes to distinguish between all 9 reported species. Total DNA was extracted from specimens stored at the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, which had been collected from the wild with species identification documented by experts in the field. We used Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) and CLC Genomics Workbench to assemble complete chloroplast genomes for all nine species. Full chloroplasts unambiguously differentiated all nine species, compared with the very few single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) available with core DNA barcoding markers. SNPs for any two Echinacea chloroplast genomes ranged from 181 to 910, and provided robust data for unambiguous species delimitation. Implications for DNA-based species identification assays derived from chloroplast genome sequences are discussed in light of product safety, adulteration and quality issues. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5428300 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54283002017-05-15 An analysis of Echinacea chloroplast genomes: Implications for future botanical identification Zhang, Ning Erickson, David L. Ramachandran, Padmini Ottesen, Andrea R. Timme, Ruth E. Funk, Vicki A. Luo, Yan Handy, Sara M. Sci Rep Article Echinacea is a common botanical used in dietary supplements, primarily to treat upper respiratory tract infections and to support immune function. There are currently thought to be nine species in the genus Echinacea. Due to very low molecular divergence among sister species, traditional DNA barcoding has not been successful for differentiation of Echinacea species. Here, we present the use of full chloroplast genomes to distinguish between all 9 reported species. Total DNA was extracted from specimens stored at the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, which had been collected from the wild with species identification documented by experts in the field. We used Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) and CLC Genomics Workbench to assemble complete chloroplast genomes for all nine species. Full chloroplasts unambiguously differentiated all nine species, compared with the very few single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) available with core DNA barcoding markers. SNPs for any two Echinacea chloroplast genomes ranged from 181 to 910, and provided robust data for unambiguous species delimitation. Implications for DNA-based species identification assays derived from chloroplast genome sequences are discussed in light of product safety, adulteration and quality issues. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5428300/ /pubmed/28303008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00321-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Zhang, Ning Erickson, David L. Ramachandran, Padmini Ottesen, Andrea R. Timme, Ruth E. Funk, Vicki A. Luo, Yan Handy, Sara M. An analysis of Echinacea chloroplast genomes: Implications for future botanical identification |
title | An analysis of Echinacea chloroplast genomes: Implications for future botanical identification |
title_full | An analysis of Echinacea chloroplast genomes: Implications for future botanical identification |
title_fullStr | An analysis of Echinacea chloroplast genomes: Implications for future botanical identification |
title_full_unstemmed | An analysis of Echinacea chloroplast genomes: Implications for future botanical identification |
title_short | An analysis of Echinacea chloroplast genomes: Implications for future botanical identification |
title_sort | analysis of echinacea chloroplast genomes: implications for future botanical identification |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5428300/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28303008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00321-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangning ananalysisofechinaceachloroplastgenomesimplicationsforfuturebotanicalidentification AT ericksondavidl ananalysisofechinaceachloroplastgenomesimplicationsforfuturebotanicalidentification AT ramachandranpadmini ananalysisofechinaceachloroplastgenomesimplicationsforfuturebotanicalidentification AT ottesenandrear ananalysisofechinaceachloroplastgenomesimplicationsforfuturebotanicalidentification AT timmeruthe ananalysisofechinaceachloroplastgenomesimplicationsforfuturebotanicalidentification AT funkvickia ananalysisofechinaceachloroplastgenomesimplicationsforfuturebotanicalidentification AT luoyan ananalysisofechinaceachloroplastgenomesimplicationsforfuturebotanicalidentification AT handysaram ananalysisofechinaceachloroplastgenomesimplicationsforfuturebotanicalidentification AT zhangning analysisofechinaceachloroplastgenomesimplicationsforfuturebotanicalidentification AT ericksondavidl analysisofechinaceachloroplastgenomesimplicationsforfuturebotanicalidentification AT ramachandranpadmini analysisofechinaceachloroplastgenomesimplicationsforfuturebotanicalidentification AT ottesenandrear analysisofechinaceachloroplastgenomesimplicationsforfuturebotanicalidentification AT timmeruthe analysisofechinaceachloroplastgenomesimplicationsforfuturebotanicalidentification AT funkvickia analysisofechinaceachloroplastgenomesimplicationsforfuturebotanicalidentification AT luoyan analysisofechinaceachloroplastgenomesimplicationsforfuturebotanicalidentification AT handysaram analysisofechinaceachloroplastgenomesimplicationsforfuturebotanicalidentification |