Cargando…

Diagnostic accuracy of DWI in patients with ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) is recently developed for identifying different malignant tumors. In this article the diagnostic accuracy of DWI for ovarian cancer was evaluated by synthesis of published data. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yuan, Xia, Guo, Linghong, Du, Wei, Mo, Fei, Liu, Ming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5428573/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28489739
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006659
_version_ 1783235849834463232
author Yuan, Xia
Guo, Linghong
Du, Wei
Mo, Fei
Liu, Ming
author_facet Yuan, Xia
Guo, Linghong
Du, Wei
Mo, Fei
Liu, Ming
author_sort Yuan, Xia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) is recently developed for identifying different malignant tumors. In this article the diagnostic accuracy of DWI for ovarian cancer was evaluated by synthesis of published data. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase databases on the diagnostic performance of DWI for ovarian cancer published in English. Methodological quality was evaluated following Quality Assessment for Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy 2 (QUADAS 2) tool. We adopted the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve to assess the DWI accuracy. RESULTS: Twelve studies including 1142 lesions were analyzed in this meta-analysis to estimate the pooled Sen (sensitivity), Spe (specificity), PLR (positive likelihood ratio), NLR (negative likelihood ratio), and construct SROC (summary receiver operating characteristics) curve. The pooled Sen and Spe were 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83–0.89) and 0.81 (95%CI, 0.77–0.84), respectively. The pooled PLR and pooled NLR were 5.07 (95%CI, 3.15–8.16) and 0.17 (95%CI, 0.10–0.30), respectively. The pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 35.23 (95%CI, 17.21–72.14). The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.9160. CONCLUSION: DWI had moderately excellent diagnostic ability for ovarian cancer and promised to be a helpful diagnostic tool for patients of ovarian cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5428573
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54285732017-05-17 Diagnostic accuracy of DWI in patients with ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis Yuan, Xia Guo, Linghong Du, Wei Mo, Fei Liu, Ming Medicine (Baltimore) 5700 BACKGROUND: Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) is recently developed for identifying different malignant tumors. In this article the diagnostic accuracy of DWI for ovarian cancer was evaluated by synthesis of published data. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase databases on the diagnostic performance of DWI for ovarian cancer published in English. Methodological quality was evaluated following Quality Assessment for Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy 2 (QUADAS 2) tool. We adopted the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve to assess the DWI accuracy. RESULTS: Twelve studies including 1142 lesions were analyzed in this meta-analysis to estimate the pooled Sen (sensitivity), Spe (specificity), PLR (positive likelihood ratio), NLR (negative likelihood ratio), and construct SROC (summary receiver operating characteristics) curve. The pooled Sen and Spe were 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83–0.89) and 0.81 (95%CI, 0.77–0.84), respectively. The pooled PLR and pooled NLR were 5.07 (95%CI, 3.15–8.16) and 0.17 (95%CI, 0.10–0.30), respectively. The pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 35.23 (95%CI, 17.21–72.14). The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.9160. CONCLUSION: DWI had moderately excellent diagnostic ability for ovarian cancer and promised to be a helpful diagnostic tool for patients of ovarian cancer. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5428573/ /pubmed/28489739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006659 Text en Copyright © 2017 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle 5700
Yuan, Xia
Guo, Linghong
Du, Wei
Mo, Fei
Liu, Ming
Diagnostic accuracy of DWI in patients with ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis
title Diagnostic accuracy of DWI in patients with ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis
title_full Diagnostic accuracy of DWI in patients with ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis
title_fullStr Diagnostic accuracy of DWI in patients with ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic accuracy of DWI in patients with ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis
title_short Diagnostic accuracy of DWI in patients with ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of dwi in patients with ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis
topic 5700
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5428573/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28489739
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006659
work_keys_str_mv AT yuanxia diagnosticaccuracyofdwiinpatientswithovariancancerametaanalysis
AT guolinghong diagnosticaccuracyofdwiinpatientswithovariancancerametaanalysis
AT duwei diagnosticaccuracyofdwiinpatientswithovariancancerametaanalysis
AT mofei diagnosticaccuracyofdwiinpatientswithovariancancerametaanalysis
AT liuming diagnosticaccuracyofdwiinpatientswithovariancancerametaanalysis