Cargando…
Diagnostic accuracy of DWI in patients with ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) is recently developed for identifying different malignant tumors. In this article the diagnostic accuracy of DWI for ovarian cancer was evaluated by synthesis of published data. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE an...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5428573/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28489739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006659 |
_version_ | 1783235849834463232 |
---|---|
author | Yuan, Xia Guo, Linghong Du, Wei Mo, Fei Liu, Ming |
author_facet | Yuan, Xia Guo, Linghong Du, Wei Mo, Fei Liu, Ming |
author_sort | Yuan, Xia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) is recently developed for identifying different malignant tumors. In this article the diagnostic accuracy of DWI for ovarian cancer was evaluated by synthesis of published data. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase databases on the diagnostic performance of DWI for ovarian cancer published in English. Methodological quality was evaluated following Quality Assessment for Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy 2 (QUADAS 2) tool. We adopted the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve to assess the DWI accuracy. RESULTS: Twelve studies including 1142 lesions were analyzed in this meta-analysis to estimate the pooled Sen (sensitivity), Spe (specificity), PLR (positive likelihood ratio), NLR (negative likelihood ratio), and construct SROC (summary receiver operating characteristics) curve. The pooled Sen and Spe were 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83–0.89) and 0.81 (95%CI, 0.77–0.84), respectively. The pooled PLR and pooled NLR were 5.07 (95%CI, 3.15–8.16) and 0.17 (95%CI, 0.10–0.30), respectively. The pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 35.23 (95%CI, 17.21–72.14). The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.9160. CONCLUSION: DWI had moderately excellent diagnostic ability for ovarian cancer and promised to be a helpful diagnostic tool for patients of ovarian cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5428573 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54285732017-05-17 Diagnostic accuracy of DWI in patients with ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis Yuan, Xia Guo, Linghong Du, Wei Mo, Fei Liu, Ming Medicine (Baltimore) 5700 BACKGROUND: Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) is recently developed for identifying different malignant tumors. In this article the diagnostic accuracy of DWI for ovarian cancer was evaluated by synthesis of published data. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase databases on the diagnostic performance of DWI for ovarian cancer published in English. Methodological quality was evaluated following Quality Assessment for Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy 2 (QUADAS 2) tool. We adopted the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve to assess the DWI accuracy. RESULTS: Twelve studies including 1142 lesions were analyzed in this meta-analysis to estimate the pooled Sen (sensitivity), Spe (specificity), PLR (positive likelihood ratio), NLR (negative likelihood ratio), and construct SROC (summary receiver operating characteristics) curve. The pooled Sen and Spe were 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83–0.89) and 0.81 (95%CI, 0.77–0.84), respectively. The pooled PLR and pooled NLR were 5.07 (95%CI, 3.15–8.16) and 0.17 (95%CI, 0.10–0.30), respectively. The pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 35.23 (95%CI, 17.21–72.14). The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.9160. CONCLUSION: DWI had moderately excellent diagnostic ability for ovarian cancer and promised to be a helpful diagnostic tool for patients of ovarian cancer. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5428573/ /pubmed/28489739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006659 Text en Copyright © 2017 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 5700 Yuan, Xia Guo, Linghong Du, Wei Mo, Fei Liu, Ming Diagnostic accuracy of DWI in patients with ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis |
title | Diagnostic accuracy of DWI in patients with ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis |
title_full | Diagnostic accuracy of DWI in patients with ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic accuracy of DWI in patients with ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic accuracy of DWI in patients with ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis |
title_short | Diagnostic accuracy of DWI in patients with ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis |
title_sort | diagnostic accuracy of dwi in patients with ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis |
topic | 5700 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5428573/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28489739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006659 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yuanxia diagnosticaccuracyofdwiinpatientswithovariancancerametaanalysis AT guolinghong diagnosticaccuracyofdwiinpatientswithovariancancerametaanalysis AT duwei diagnosticaccuracyofdwiinpatientswithovariancancerametaanalysis AT mofei diagnosticaccuracyofdwiinpatientswithovariancancerametaanalysis AT liuming diagnosticaccuracyofdwiinpatientswithovariancancerametaanalysis |