Cargando…

Comparison of learning performance of 2 intubating laryngeal mask airways in novice: A randomized crossover manikin study

BACKGROUND: Intubating laryngeal mask airways (LMAs) such as i-gel and Aura-i could serve as rescue devices in resuscitation and further ensure the airway by facilitating trachea intubation without ventilation interruption. But data regarding intubating LMAs in novice are limited and skill degenerat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Zi-Jia, Yi, Jie, Chen, Wei-Yun, Zhang, Xiu-Hua, Huang, Yu-Guang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5428638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28489804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006905
_version_ 1783235866010845184
author Liu, Zi-Jia
Yi, Jie
Chen, Wei-Yun
Zhang, Xiu-Hua
Huang, Yu-Guang
author_facet Liu, Zi-Jia
Yi, Jie
Chen, Wei-Yun
Zhang, Xiu-Hua
Huang, Yu-Guang
author_sort Liu, Zi-Jia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intubating laryngeal mask airways (LMAs) such as i-gel and Aura-i could serve as rescue devices in resuscitation and further ensure the airway by facilitating trachea intubation without ventilation interruption. But data regarding intubating LMAs in novice are limited and skill degeneration without regular training has not been evaluated. So we designed this prospective randomized crossover manikin study to compare the learning performance of 2 intubating LMAs (i-gel and Aura-i). METHODS: In total, 46 novice doctors participated in this study. After standardized training and finishing 3 consecutive successful intubations with both LMAs on manikin, each participant applied intubation with both LMAs in random order for initial evaluation. To evaluate skill retention, participants were reassessed 90 days later on the same manikin without retraining between times. Primary outcome was time to successful ventilation (TTV). RESULTS: The TTV for i-gel was significantly shorter than Aura-i (initial evaluation 11.8 ± 2.9 seconds vs 22.4 ± 5.2 seconds, 90-days reevaluation 14.9 ± 3.6 seconds vs 28.9 ± 10.0 seconds, initial evaluation, P = .001; second evaluation, P < .001); during re-evaluation, TTV taken for i-gel and Aura-i were both significantly longer (initial evaluation, P = .001; second evaluation, P < .001) and ease score of insertion both increased profoundly (i-gel P = .025; Aura-i P < .001). In both assessments, participants preferred i-gel as easier alternative (initial evaluation, P = .001; second evaluation, P < .001). There was no difference in successful intubation rate, first attempt success rate, bronchoscopy assessment, and insertion score for 2 LMAs. CONCLUSION: Compared with Aura-i, i-gel showed a faster and easier intubation by novice doctors in this manikin study; the skill retention of intubation performance after 3 months was acceptable for both intubating LMAs, but TTV prolonged significantly.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5428638
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54286382017-05-17 Comparison of learning performance of 2 intubating laryngeal mask airways in novice: A randomized crossover manikin study Liu, Zi-Jia Yi, Jie Chen, Wei-Yun Zhang, Xiu-Hua Huang, Yu-Guang Medicine (Baltimore) 3300 BACKGROUND: Intubating laryngeal mask airways (LMAs) such as i-gel and Aura-i could serve as rescue devices in resuscitation and further ensure the airway by facilitating trachea intubation without ventilation interruption. But data regarding intubating LMAs in novice are limited and skill degeneration without regular training has not been evaluated. So we designed this prospective randomized crossover manikin study to compare the learning performance of 2 intubating LMAs (i-gel and Aura-i). METHODS: In total, 46 novice doctors participated in this study. After standardized training and finishing 3 consecutive successful intubations with both LMAs on manikin, each participant applied intubation with both LMAs in random order for initial evaluation. To evaluate skill retention, participants were reassessed 90 days later on the same manikin without retraining between times. Primary outcome was time to successful ventilation (TTV). RESULTS: The TTV for i-gel was significantly shorter than Aura-i (initial evaluation 11.8 ± 2.9 seconds vs 22.4 ± 5.2 seconds, 90-days reevaluation 14.9 ± 3.6 seconds vs 28.9 ± 10.0 seconds, initial evaluation, P = .001; second evaluation, P < .001); during re-evaluation, TTV taken for i-gel and Aura-i were both significantly longer (initial evaluation, P = .001; second evaluation, P < .001) and ease score of insertion both increased profoundly (i-gel P = .025; Aura-i P < .001). In both assessments, participants preferred i-gel as easier alternative (initial evaluation, P = .001; second evaluation, P < .001). There was no difference in successful intubation rate, first attempt success rate, bronchoscopy assessment, and insertion score for 2 LMAs. CONCLUSION: Compared with Aura-i, i-gel showed a faster and easier intubation by novice doctors in this manikin study; the skill retention of intubation performance after 3 months was acceptable for both intubating LMAs, but TTV prolonged significantly. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5428638/ /pubmed/28489804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006905 Text en Copyright © 2017 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 3300
Liu, Zi-Jia
Yi, Jie
Chen, Wei-Yun
Zhang, Xiu-Hua
Huang, Yu-Guang
Comparison of learning performance of 2 intubating laryngeal mask airways in novice: A randomized crossover manikin study
title Comparison of learning performance of 2 intubating laryngeal mask airways in novice: A randomized crossover manikin study
title_full Comparison of learning performance of 2 intubating laryngeal mask airways in novice: A randomized crossover manikin study
title_fullStr Comparison of learning performance of 2 intubating laryngeal mask airways in novice: A randomized crossover manikin study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of learning performance of 2 intubating laryngeal mask airways in novice: A randomized crossover manikin study
title_short Comparison of learning performance of 2 intubating laryngeal mask airways in novice: A randomized crossover manikin study
title_sort comparison of learning performance of 2 intubating laryngeal mask airways in novice: a randomized crossover manikin study
topic 3300
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5428638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28489804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006905
work_keys_str_mv AT liuzijia comparisonoflearningperformanceof2intubatinglaryngealmaskairwaysinnovicearandomizedcrossovermanikinstudy
AT yijie comparisonoflearningperformanceof2intubatinglaryngealmaskairwaysinnovicearandomizedcrossovermanikinstudy
AT chenweiyun comparisonoflearningperformanceof2intubatinglaryngealmaskairwaysinnovicearandomizedcrossovermanikinstudy
AT zhangxiuhua comparisonoflearningperformanceof2intubatinglaryngealmaskairwaysinnovicearandomizedcrossovermanikinstudy
AT huangyuguang comparisonoflearningperformanceof2intubatinglaryngealmaskairwaysinnovicearandomizedcrossovermanikinstudy