Cargando…
USE OF THE PROSTATE HEALTH INDEX FOR DETECTION OF PROSTATE CANCER: RESULTS FROM A LARGE ACADEMIC PRACTICE
BACKGROUND: The Prostate Health Index (phi) outperforms PSA and other PSA derivatives for the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa). The impact of phi testing in the real-world clinical setting has not been previously assessed. METHODS: In a single, large, academic center, phi was tested in 345 patient...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5429201/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28117387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/pcan.2016.72 |
_version_ | 1783235979561140224 |
---|---|
author | Tosoian, Jeffrey J. Druskin, Sasha C. Andreas, Darian Mullane, Patrick Chappidi, Meera Joo, Sarah Ghabili, Kamyar Agostino, Joseph Macura, Katarzyna J. Carter, H. Ballentine Schaeffer, Edward M. Partin, Alan W. Sokoll, Lori J. Ross, Ashley E. |
author_facet | Tosoian, Jeffrey J. Druskin, Sasha C. Andreas, Darian Mullane, Patrick Chappidi, Meera Joo, Sarah Ghabili, Kamyar Agostino, Joseph Macura, Katarzyna J. Carter, H. Ballentine Schaeffer, Edward M. Partin, Alan W. Sokoll, Lori J. Ross, Ashley E. |
author_sort | Tosoian, Jeffrey J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Prostate Health Index (phi) outperforms PSA and other PSA derivatives for the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa). The impact of phi testing in the real-world clinical setting has not been previously assessed. METHODS: In a single, large, academic center, phi was tested in 345 patients presenting for diagnostic evaluation for PCa. Findings on prostate biopsy (including Grade Group [GG], defined as GG1: Gleason score [GS] 6, GG2: GS 3+4=7, GG3: GS 4+3=7, GG4: GS 8, and GG5: GS 9-10), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and radical prostatectomy (RP) were prospectively recorded. Biopsy rates and outcomes were compared to a contemporary cohort that did not undergo phi testing (n=1318). RESULTS: Overall, 39% of men with phi testing underwent prostate biopsy. No men with phi<19.6 were diagnosed with PCa, and only 3 men with phi<27 had cancer of GG≥2. Phi was superior to PSA for the prediction of any PCa (AUC 0.72 vs. 0.47) and GG≥2 PCa (AUC 0.77 vs. 0.53) on prostate biopsy. Among men undergoing MRI and phi, no men with phi<27 and PI-RADS≤3 had GG≥2 cancer. For those men proceeding to RP, increasing phi was associated with higher pathologic GG (p=0.002) and stage (p=0.001). Compared to patients who did not undergo phi testing, the use of phi was associated with a 9% reduction in the rate of prostate biopsy (39% vs. 48%; p<0.001). Importantly, the reduction in biopsy among the phi population was secondary to decreased incidence of negative (8%) and GG1 (1%) biopsies, while the proportion of biopsies detecting GG≥2 cancers remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: In this large, real-time clinical experience, phi outperformed PSA alone, was associated with high-grade PCa, and provided complementary information to MRI. Incorporation of phi into clinical practice reduced the rate of unnecessary biopsies without changing the frequency of detection of higher grade cancers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5429201 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54292012017-07-24 USE OF THE PROSTATE HEALTH INDEX FOR DETECTION OF PROSTATE CANCER: RESULTS FROM A LARGE ACADEMIC PRACTICE Tosoian, Jeffrey J. Druskin, Sasha C. Andreas, Darian Mullane, Patrick Chappidi, Meera Joo, Sarah Ghabili, Kamyar Agostino, Joseph Macura, Katarzyna J. Carter, H. Ballentine Schaeffer, Edward M. Partin, Alan W. Sokoll, Lori J. Ross, Ashley E. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Article BACKGROUND: The Prostate Health Index (phi) outperforms PSA and other PSA derivatives for the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa). The impact of phi testing in the real-world clinical setting has not been previously assessed. METHODS: In a single, large, academic center, phi was tested in 345 patients presenting for diagnostic evaluation for PCa. Findings on prostate biopsy (including Grade Group [GG], defined as GG1: Gleason score [GS] 6, GG2: GS 3+4=7, GG3: GS 4+3=7, GG4: GS 8, and GG5: GS 9-10), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and radical prostatectomy (RP) were prospectively recorded. Biopsy rates and outcomes were compared to a contemporary cohort that did not undergo phi testing (n=1318). RESULTS: Overall, 39% of men with phi testing underwent prostate biopsy. No men with phi<19.6 were diagnosed with PCa, and only 3 men with phi<27 had cancer of GG≥2. Phi was superior to PSA for the prediction of any PCa (AUC 0.72 vs. 0.47) and GG≥2 PCa (AUC 0.77 vs. 0.53) on prostate biopsy. Among men undergoing MRI and phi, no men with phi<27 and PI-RADS≤3 had GG≥2 cancer. For those men proceeding to RP, increasing phi was associated with higher pathologic GG (p=0.002) and stage (p=0.001). Compared to patients who did not undergo phi testing, the use of phi was associated with a 9% reduction in the rate of prostate biopsy (39% vs. 48%; p<0.001). Importantly, the reduction in biopsy among the phi population was secondary to decreased incidence of negative (8%) and GG1 (1%) biopsies, while the proportion of biopsies detecting GG≥2 cancers remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: In this large, real-time clinical experience, phi outperformed PSA alone, was associated with high-grade PCa, and provided complementary information to MRI. Incorporation of phi into clinical practice reduced the rate of unnecessary biopsies without changing the frequency of detection of higher grade cancers. 2017-01-24 2017-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5429201/ /pubmed/28117387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/pcan.2016.72 Text en Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms |
spellingShingle | Article Tosoian, Jeffrey J. Druskin, Sasha C. Andreas, Darian Mullane, Patrick Chappidi, Meera Joo, Sarah Ghabili, Kamyar Agostino, Joseph Macura, Katarzyna J. Carter, H. Ballentine Schaeffer, Edward M. Partin, Alan W. Sokoll, Lori J. Ross, Ashley E. USE OF THE PROSTATE HEALTH INDEX FOR DETECTION OF PROSTATE CANCER: RESULTS FROM A LARGE ACADEMIC PRACTICE |
title | USE OF THE PROSTATE HEALTH INDEX FOR DETECTION OF PROSTATE CANCER: RESULTS FROM A LARGE ACADEMIC PRACTICE |
title_full | USE OF THE PROSTATE HEALTH INDEX FOR DETECTION OF PROSTATE CANCER: RESULTS FROM A LARGE ACADEMIC PRACTICE |
title_fullStr | USE OF THE PROSTATE HEALTH INDEX FOR DETECTION OF PROSTATE CANCER: RESULTS FROM A LARGE ACADEMIC PRACTICE |
title_full_unstemmed | USE OF THE PROSTATE HEALTH INDEX FOR DETECTION OF PROSTATE CANCER: RESULTS FROM A LARGE ACADEMIC PRACTICE |
title_short | USE OF THE PROSTATE HEALTH INDEX FOR DETECTION OF PROSTATE CANCER: RESULTS FROM A LARGE ACADEMIC PRACTICE |
title_sort | use of the prostate health index for detection of prostate cancer: results from a large academic practice |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5429201/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28117387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/pcan.2016.72 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tosoianjeffreyj useoftheprostatehealthindexfordetectionofprostatecancerresultsfromalargeacademicpractice AT druskinsashac useoftheprostatehealthindexfordetectionofprostatecancerresultsfromalargeacademicpractice AT andreasdarian useoftheprostatehealthindexfordetectionofprostatecancerresultsfromalargeacademicpractice AT mullanepatrick useoftheprostatehealthindexfordetectionofprostatecancerresultsfromalargeacademicpractice AT chappidimeera useoftheprostatehealthindexfordetectionofprostatecancerresultsfromalargeacademicpractice AT joosarah useoftheprostatehealthindexfordetectionofprostatecancerresultsfromalargeacademicpractice AT ghabilikamyar useoftheprostatehealthindexfordetectionofprostatecancerresultsfromalargeacademicpractice AT agostinojoseph useoftheprostatehealthindexfordetectionofprostatecancerresultsfromalargeacademicpractice AT macurakatarzynaj useoftheprostatehealthindexfordetectionofprostatecancerresultsfromalargeacademicpractice AT carterhballentine useoftheprostatehealthindexfordetectionofprostatecancerresultsfromalargeacademicpractice AT schaefferedwardm useoftheprostatehealthindexfordetectionofprostatecancerresultsfromalargeacademicpractice AT partinalanw useoftheprostatehealthindexfordetectionofprostatecancerresultsfromalargeacademicpractice AT sokolllorij useoftheprostatehealthindexfordetectionofprostatecancerresultsfromalargeacademicpractice AT rossashleye useoftheprostatehealthindexfordetectionofprostatecancerresultsfromalargeacademicpractice |