Cargando…

Effects of a genetically modified potato on a non-target aphid are outweighed by cultivar differences

Insect–plant interactions may be unintentionally affected when introducing genetically modified (GM) crops into an agro-ecosystem. Our aim was to test the non-target effects of a late blight-resistant GM potato on Myzus persicae in greenhouse and climate room experiments and understand how position...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lazebnik, Jenny, Arpaia, Salvatore, Baldacchino, Ferdinando, Banzato, Paolo, Moliterni, Stefania, Vossen, Jack H., van de Zande, Els M., van Loon, Joop J. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5429349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28572750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10340-017-0831-6
_version_ 1783235995303411712
author Lazebnik, Jenny
Arpaia, Salvatore
Baldacchino, Ferdinando
Banzato, Paolo
Moliterni, Stefania
Vossen, Jack H.
van de Zande, Els M.
van Loon, Joop J. A.
author_facet Lazebnik, Jenny
Arpaia, Salvatore
Baldacchino, Ferdinando
Banzato, Paolo
Moliterni, Stefania
Vossen, Jack H.
van de Zande, Els M.
van Loon, Joop J. A.
author_sort Lazebnik, Jenny
collection PubMed
description Insect–plant interactions may be unintentionally affected when introducing genetically modified (GM) crops into an agro-ecosystem. Our aim was to test the non-target effects of a late blight-resistant GM potato on Myzus persicae in greenhouse and climate room experiments and understand how position and number of R gene insertions can affect non-targets in GM events. We also aimed to compare results to baseline differences among three conventional potato varieties varying in resistance to late blight. Aphid development and survival were affected by some GM events in the first generation, though effects disappeared in the second generation. Effects were not dependent on the presence of a marker gene or the insertion of a second resistance gene. Positional effects of gene insertion influenced aphid performance on certain GM events. However, aphid fitness varied considerably more between conventional potato varieties than between Désirée and the GM events. Comparing different GM events to the non-transformed variety is relevant, since unintended effects of insertion can occur. Our protocols can be recommended for in planta risk assessments with aphids. Ecological perspective is gained by selecting several measured endpoints and by comparing the results with a baseline of conventional cultivars.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5429349
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54293492017-05-30 Effects of a genetically modified potato on a non-target aphid are outweighed by cultivar differences Lazebnik, Jenny Arpaia, Salvatore Baldacchino, Ferdinando Banzato, Paolo Moliterni, Stefania Vossen, Jack H. van de Zande, Els M. van Loon, Joop J. A. J Pest Sci (2004) Original Paper Insect–plant interactions may be unintentionally affected when introducing genetically modified (GM) crops into an agro-ecosystem. Our aim was to test the non-target effects of a late blight-resistant GM potato on Myzus persicae in greenhouse and climate room experiments and understand how position and number of R gene insertions can affect non-targets in GM events. We also aimed to compare results to baseline differences among three conventional potato varieties varying in resistance to late blight. Aphid development and survival were affected by some GM events in the first generation, though effects disappeared in the second generation. Effects were not dependent on the presence of a marker gene or the insertion of a second resistance gene. Positional effects of gene insertion influenced aphid performance on certain GM events. However, aphid fitness varied considerably more between conventional potato varieties than between Désirée and the GM events. Comparing different GM events to the non-transformed variety is relevant, since unintended effects of insertion can occur. Our protocols can be recommended for in planta risk assessments with aphids. Ecological perspective is gained by selecting several measured endpoints and by comparing the results with a baseline of conventional cultivars. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-01-18 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5429349/ /pubmed/28572750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10340-017-0831-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Lazebnik, Jenny
Arpaia, Salvatore
Baldacchino, Ferdinando
Banzato, Paolo
Moliterni, Stefania
Vossen, Jack H.
van de Zande, Els M.
van Loon, Joop J. A.
Effects of a genetically modified potato on a non-target aphid are outweighed by cultivar differences
title Effects of a genetically modified potato on a non-target aphid are outweighed by cultivar differences
title_full Effects of a genetically modified potato on a non-target aphid are outweighed by cultivar differences
title_fullStr Effects of a genetically modified potato on a non-target aphid are outweighed by cultivar differences
title_full_unstemmed Effects of a genetically modified potato on a non-target aphid are outweighed by cultivar differences
title_short Effects of a genetically modified potato on a non-target aphid are outweighed by cultivar differences
title_sort effects of a genetically modified potato on a non-target aphid are outweighed by cultivar differences
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5429349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28572750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10340-017-0831-6
work_keys_str_mv AT lazebnikjenny effectsofageneticallymodifiedpotatoonanontargetaphidareoutweighedbycultivardifferences
AT arpaiasalvatore effectsofageneticallymodifiedpotatoonanontargetaphidareoutweighedbycultivardifferences
AT baldacchinoferdinando effectsofageneticallymodifiedpotatoonanontargetaphidareoutweighedbycultivardifferences
AT banzatopaolo effectsofageneticallymodifiedpotatoonanontargetaphidareoutweighedbycultivardifferences
AT moliternistefania effectsofageneticallymodifiedpotatoonanontargetaphidareoutweighedbycultivardifferences
AT vossenjackh effectsofageneticallymodifiedpotatoonanontargetaphidareoutweighedbycultivardifferences
AT vandezandeelsm effectsofageneticallymodifiedpotatoonanontargetaphidareoutweighedbycultivardifferences
AT vanloonjoopja effectsofageneticallymodifiedpotatoonanontargetaphidareoutweighedbycultivardifferences