Cargando…
Effects of a genetically modified potato on a non-target aphid are outweighed by cultivar differences
Insect–plant interactions may be unintentionally affected when introducing genetically modified (GM) crops into an agro-ecosystem. Our aim was to test the non-target effects of a late blight-resistant GM potato on Myzus persicae in greenhouse and climate room experiments and understand how position...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5429349/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28572750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10340-017-0831-6 |
_version_ | 1783235995303411712 |
---|---|
author | Lazebnik, Jenny Arpaia, Salvatore Baldacchino, Ferdinando Banzato, Paolo Moliterni, Stefania Vossen, Jack H. van de Zande, Els M. van Loon, Joop J. A. |
author_facet | Lazebnik, Jenny Arpaia, Salvatore Baldacchino, Ferdinando Banzato, Paolo Moliterni, Stefania Vossen, Jack H. van de Zande, Els M. van Loon, Joop J. A. |
author_sort | Lazebnik, Jenny |
collection | PubMed |
description | Insect–plant interactions may be unintentionally affected when introducing genetically modified (GM) crops into an agro-ecosystem. Our aim was to test the non-target effects of a late blight-resistant GM potato on Myzus persicae in greenhouse and climate room experiments and understand how position and number of R gene insertions can affect non-targets in GM events. We also aimed to compare results to baseline differences among three conventional potato varieties varying in resistance to late blight. Aphid development and survival were affected by some GM events in the first generation, though effects disappeared in the second generation. Effects were not dependent on the presence of a marker gene or the insertion of a second resistance gene. Positional effects of gene insertion influenced aphid performance on certain GM events. However, aphid fitness varied considerably more between conventional potato varieties than between Désirée and the GM events. Comparing different GM events to the non-transformed variety is relevant, since unintended effects of insertion can occur. Our protocols can be recommended for in planta risk assessments with aphids. Ecological perspective is gained by selecting several measured endpoints and by comparing the results with a baseline of conventional cultivars. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5429349 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54293492017-05-30 Effects of a genetically modified potato on a non-target aphid are outweighed by cultivar differences Lazebnik, Jenny Arpaia, Salvatore Baldacchino, Ferdinando Banzato, Paolo Moliterni, Stefania Vossen, Jack H. van de Zande, Els M. van Loon, Joop J. A. J Pest Sci (2004) Original Paper Insect–plant interactions may be unintentionally affected when introducing genetically modified (GM) crops into an agro-ecosystem. Our aim was to test the non-target effects of a late blight-resistant GM potato on Myzus persicae in greenhouse and climate room experiments and understand how position and number of R gene insertions can affect non-targets in GM events. We also aimed to compare results to baseline differences among three conventional potato varieties varying in resistance to late blight. Aphid development and survival were affected by some GM events in the first generation, though effects disappeared in the second generation. Effects were not dependent on the presence of a marker gene or the insertion of a second resistance gene. Positional effects of gene insertion influenced aphid performance on certain GM events. However, aphid fitness varied considerably more between conventional potato varieties than between Désirée and the GM events. Comparing different GM events to the non-transformed variety is relevant, since unintended effects of insertion can occur. Our protocols can be recommended for in planta risk assessments with aphids. Ecological perspective is gained by selecting several measured endpoints and by comparing the results with a baseline of conventional cultivars. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-01-18 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5429349/ /pubmed/28572750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10340-017-0831-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Lazebnik, Jenny Arpaia, Salvatore Baldacchino, Ferdinando Banzato, Paolo Moliterni, Stefania Vossen, Jack H. van de Zande, Els M. van Loon, Joop J. A. Effects of a genetically modified potato on a non-target aphid are outweighed by cultivar differences |
title | Effects of a genetically modified potato on a non-target aphid are outweighed by cultivar differences |
title_full | Effects of a genetically modified potato on a non-target aphid are outweighed by cultivar differences |
title_fullStr | Effects of a genetically modified potato on a non-target aphid are outweighed by cultivar differences |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of a genetically modified potato on a non-target aphid are outweighed by cultivar differences |
title_short | Effects of a genetically modified potato on a non-target aphid are outweighed by cultivar differences |
title_sort | effects of a genetically modified potato on a non-target aphid are outweighed by cultivar differences |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5429349/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28572750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10340-017-0831-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lazebnikjenny effectsofageneticallymodifiedpotatoonanontargetaphidareoutweighedbycultivardifferences AT arpaiasalvatore effectsofageneticallymodifiedpotatoonanontargetaphidareoutweighedbycultivardifferences AT baldacchinoferdinando effectsofageneticallymodifiedpotatoonanontargetaphidareoutweighedbycultivardifferences AT banzatopaolo effectsofageneticallymodifiedpotatoonanontargetaphidareoutweighedbycultivardifferences AT moliternistefania effectsofageneticallymodifiedpotatoonanontargetaphidareoutweighedbycultivardifferences AT vossenjackh effectsofageneticallymodifiedpotatoonanontargetaphidareoutweighedbycultivardifferences AT vandezandeelsm effectsofageneticallymodifiedpotatoonanontargetaphidareoutweighedbycultivardifferences AT vanloonjoopja effectsofageneticallymodifiedpotatoonanontargetaphidareoutweighedbycultivardifferences |