Cargando…

Monitoring urban beaches with qPCR vs. culture measures of fecal indicator bacteria: Implications for public notification

BACKGROUND: The United States Environmental Protection Agency has established methods for testing beach water using the rapid quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) method, as well as “beach action values” so that the results of such testing can be used to make same-day beach management decis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dorevitch, Samuel, Shrestha, Abhilasha, DeFlorio-Barker, Stephanie, Breitenbach, Cathy, Heimler, Ira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5429575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28499453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12940-017-0256-y
_version_ 1783236051372867584
author Dorevitch, Samuel
Shrestha, Abhilasha
DeFlorio-Barker, Stephanie
Breitenbach, Cathy
Heimler, Ira
author_facet Dorevitch, Samuel
Shrestha, Abhilasha
DeFlorio-Barker, Stephanie
Breitenbach, Cathy
Heimler, Ira
author_sort Dorevitch, Samuel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The United States Environmental Protection Agency has established methods for testing beach water using the rapid quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) method, as well as “beach action values” so that the results of such testing can be used to make same-day beach management decisions. Despite its numerous advantages over culture-based monitoring approaches, qPCR monitoring has yet to become widely used in the US or elsewhere. Considering qPCR results obtained on a given day as the best available measure of that day’s water quality, we evaluated the frequency of correct vs. incorrect beach management decisions that are driven by culture testing. METHODS: Beaches in Chicago, USA, were monitored using E. coli culture and enterococci qPCR methods over 894 beach-days in the summers of 2015 and 2016. Agreement in beach management using the two methods, after taking into account agreement due to chance, was summarized using Cohen’s kappa statistic. RESULTS: No meaningful agreement (beyond that expected by chance) was observed between beach management actions driven by the two pieces of information available to beach managers on a given day: enterococci qPCR results ofsamples collected that morning and E. coli culture results of samples collected the previous day. The E. coli culture beach action value was exceeded 3.4 times more frequently than the enterococci qPCR beach action value (22.6 vs. 6.6% of beach-days). CONCLUSIONS: The largest evaluation of qPCR-based beach monitoring to date provides little scientific rationale for continued E. coli culture testing of beach water in our setting. The observation that the E. coli culture beach action value was exceeded three times as frequently as the enterococci qPCR beach action value suggests that, although the beach action values for bacteria using different measurement methods are thought to provide comparable information about health risk, this does not appear to be the case in all settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5429575
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54295752017-05-15 Monitoring urban beaches with qPCR vs. culture measures of fecal indicator bacteria: Implications for public notification Dorevitch, Samuel Shrestha, Abhilasha DeFlorio-Barker, Stephanie Breitenbach, Cathy Heimler, Ira Environ Health Research BACKGROUND: The United States Environmental Protection Agency has established methods for testing beach water using the rapid quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) method, as well as “beach action values” so that the results of such testing can be used to make same-day beach management decisions. Despite its numerous advantages over culture-based monitoring approaches, qPCR monitoring has yet to become widely used in the US or elsewhere. Considering qPCR results obtained on a given day as the best available measure of that day’s water quality, we evaluated the frequency of correct vs. incorrect beach management decisions that are driven by culture testing. METHODS: Beaches in Chicago, USA, were monitored using E. coli culture and enterococci qPCR methods over 894 beach-days in the summers of 2015 and 2016. Agreement in beach management using the two methods, after taking into account agreement due to chance, was summarized using Cohen’s kappa statistic. RESULTS: No meaningful agreement (beyond that expected by chance) was observed between beach management actions driven by the two pieces of information available to beach managers on a given day: enterococci qPCR results ofsamples collected that morning and E. coli culture results of samples collected the previous day. The E. coli culture beach action value was exceeded 3.4 times more frequently than the enterococci qPCR beach action value (22.6 vs. 6.6% of beach-days). CONCLUSIONS: The largest evaluation of qPCR-based beach monitoring to date provides little scientific rationale for continued E. coli culture testing of beach water in our setting. The observation that the E. coli culture beach action value was exceeded three times as frequently as the enterococci qPCR beach action value suggests that, although the beach action values for bacteria using different measurement methods are thought to provide comparable information about health risk, this does not appear to be the case in all settings. BioMed Central 2017-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5429575/ /pubmed/28499453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12940-017-0256-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Dorevitch, Samuel
Shrestha, Abhilasha
DeFlorio-Barker, Stephanie
Breitenbach, Cathy
Heimler, Ira
Monitoring urban beaches with qPCR vs. culture measures of fecal indicator bacteria: Implications for public notification
title Monitoring urban beaches with qPCR vs. culture measures of fecal indicator bacteria: Implications for public notification
title_full Monitoring urban beaches with qPCR vs. culture measures of fecal indicator bacteria: Implications for public notification
title_fullStr Monitoring urban beaches with qPCR vs. culture measures of fecal indicator bacteria: Implications for public notification
title_full_unstemmed Monitoring urban beaches with qPCR vs. culture measures of fecal indicator bacteria: Implications for public notification
title_short Monitoring urban beaches with qPCR vs. culture measures of fecal indicator bacteria: Implications for public notification
title_sort monitoring urban beaches with qpcr vs. culture measures of fecal indicator bacteria: implications for public notification
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5429575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28499453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12940-017-0256-y
work_keys_str_mv AT dorevitchsamuel monitoringurbanbeacheswithqpcrvsculturemeasuresoffecalindicatorbacteriaimplicationsforpublicnotification
AT shresthaabhilasha monitoringurbanbeacheswithqpcrvsculturemeasuresoffecalindicatorbacteriaimplicationsforpublicnotification
AT defloriobarkerstephanie monitoringurbanbeacheswithqpcrvsculturemeasuresoffecalindicatorbacteriaimplicationsforpublicnotification
AT breitenbachcathy monitoringurbanbeacheswithqpcrvsculturemeasuresoffecalindicatorbacteriaimplicationsforpublicnotification
AT heimlerira monitoringurbanbeacheswithqpcrvsculturemeasuresoffecalindicatorbacteriaimplicationsforpublicnotification