Cargando…
Monitoring urban beaches with qPCR vs. culture measures of fecal indicator bacteria: Implications for public notification
BACKGROUND: The United States Environmental Protection Agency has established methods for testing beach water using the rapid quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) method, as well as “beach action values” so that the results of such testing can be used to make same-day beach management decis...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5429575/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28499453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12940-017-0256-y |
_version_ | 1783236051372867584 |
---|---|
author | Dorevitch, Samuel Shrestha, Abhilasha DeFlorio-Barker, Stephanie Breitenbach, Cathy Heimler, Ira |
author_facet | Dorevitch, Samuel Shrestha, Abhilasha DeFlorio-Barker, Stephanie Breitenbach, Cathy Heimler, Ira |
author_sort | Dorevitch, Samuel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The United States Environmental Protection Agency has established methods for testing beach water using the rapid quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) method, as well as “beach action values” so that the results of such testing can be used to make same-day beach management decisions. Despite its numerous advantages over culture-based monitoring approaches, qPCR monitoring has yet to become widely used in the US or elsewhere. Considering qPCR results obtained on a given day as the best available measure of that day’s water quality, we evaluated the frequency of correct vs. incorrect beach management decisions that are driven by culture testing. METHODS: Beaches in Chicago, USA, were monitored using E. coli culture and enterococci qPCR methods over 894 beach-days in the summers of 2015 and 2016. Agreement in beach management using the two methods, after taking into account agreement due to chance, was summarized using Cohen’s kappa statistic. RESULTS: No meaningful agreement (beyond that expected by chance) was observed between beach management actions driven by the two pieces of information available to beach managers on a given day: enterococci qPCR results ofsamples collected that morning and E. coli culture results of samples collected the previous day. The E. coli culture beach action value was exceeded 3.4 times more frequently than the enterococci qPCR beach action value (22.6 vs. 6.6% of beach-days). CONCLUSIONS: The largest evaluation of qPCR-based beach monitoring to date provides little scientific rationale for continued E. coli culture testing of beach water in our setting. The observation that the E. coli culture beach action value was exceeded three times as frequently as the enterococci qPCR beach action value suggests that, although the beach action values for bacteria using different measurement methods are thought to provide comparable information about health risk, this does not appear to be the case in all settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5429575 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54295752017-05-15 Monitoring urban beaches with qPCR vs. culture measures of fecal indicator bacteria: Implications for public notification Dorevitch, Samuel Shrestha, Abhilasha DeFlorio-Barker, Stephanie Breitenbach, Cathy Heimler, Ira Environ Health Research BACKGROUND: The United States Environmental Protection Agency has established methods for testing beach water using the rapid quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) method, as well as “beach action values” so that the results of such testing can be used to make same-day beach management decisions. Despite its numerous advantages over culture-based monitoring approaches, qPCR monitoring has yet to become widely used in the US or elsewhere. Considering qPCR results obtained on a given day as the best available measure of that day’s water quality, we evaluated the frequency of correct vs. incorrect beach management decisions that are driven by culture testing. METHODS: Beaches in Chicago, USA, were monitored using E. coli culture and enterococci qPCR methods over 894 beach-days in the summers of 2015 and 2016. Agreement in beach management using the two methods, after taking into account agreement due to chance, was summarized using Cohen’s kappa statistic. RESULTS: No meaningful agreement (beyond that expected by chance) was observed between beach management actions driven by the two pieces of information available to beach managers on a given day: enterococci qPCR results ofsamples collected that morning and E. coli culture results of samples collected the previous day. The E. coli culture beach action value was exceeded 3.4 times more frequently than the enterococci qPCR beach action value (22.6 vs. 6.6% of beach-days). CONCLUSIONS: The largest evaluation of qPCR-based beach monitoring to date provides little scientific rationale for continued E. coli culture testing of beach water in our setting. The observation that the E. coli culture beach action value was exceeded three times as frequently as the enterococci qPCR beach action value suggests that, although the beach action values for bacteria using different measurement methods are thought to provide comparable information about health risk, this does not appear to be the case in all settings. BioMed Central 2017-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5429575/ /pubmed/28499453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12940-017-0256-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Dorevitch, Samuel Shrestha, Abhilasha DeFlorio-Barker, Stephanie Breitenbach, Cathy Heimler, Ira Monitoring urban beaches with qPCR vs. culture measures of fecal indicator bacteria: Implications for public notification |
title | Monitoring urban beaches with qPCR vs. culture measures of fecal indicator bacteria: Implications for public notification |
title_full | Monitoring urban beaches with qPCR vs. culture measures of fecal indicator bacteria: Implications for public notification |
title_fullStr | Monitoring urban beaches with qPCR vs. culture measures of fecal indicator bacteria: Implications for public notification |
title_full_unstemmed | Monitoring urban beaches with qPCR vs. culture measures of fecal indicator bacteria: Implications for public notification |
title_short | Monitoring urban beaches with qPCR vs. culture measures of fecal indicator bacteria: Implications for public notification |
title_sort | monitoring urban beaches with qpcr vs. culture measures of fecal indicator bacteria: implications for public notification |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5429575/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28499453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12940-017-0256-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dorevitchsamuel monitoringurbanbeacheswithqpcrvsculturemeasuresoffecalindicatorbacteriaimplicationsforpublicnotification AT shresthaabhilasha monitoringurbanbeacheswithqpcrvsculturemeasuresoffecalindicatorbacteriaimplicationsforpublicnotification AT defloriobarkerstephanie monitoringurbanbeacheswithqpcrvsculturemeasuresoffecalindicatorbacteriaimplicationsforpublicnotification AT breitenbachcathy monitoringurbanbeacheswithqpcrvsculturemeasuresoffecalindicatorbacteriaimplicationsforpublicnotification AT heimlerira monitoringurbanbeacheswithqpcrvsculturemeasuresoffecalindicatorbacteriaimplicationsforpublicnotification |