Cargando…
Psychophysical measurements in children: challenges, pitfalls, and considerations
Measuring sensory sensitivity is important in studying development and developmental disorders. However, with children, there is a need to balance reliable but lengthy sensory tasks with the child’s ability to maintain motivation and vigilance. We used simulations to explore the problems associated...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5429739/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28507816 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3231 |
_version_ | 1783236089671057408 |
---|---|
author | Witton, Caroline Talcott, Joel B. Henning, G. Bruce |
author_facet | Witton, Caroline Talcott, Joel B. Henning, G. Bruce |
author_sort | Witton, Caroline |
collection | PubMed |
description | Measuring sensory sensitivity is important in studying development and developmental disorders. However, with children, there is a need to balance reliable but lengthy sensory tasks with the child’s ability to maintain motivation and vigilance. We used simulations to explore the problems associated with shortening adaptive psychophysical procedures, and suggest how these problems might be addressed. We quantify how adaptive procedures with too few reversals can over-estimate thresholds, introduce substantial measurement error, and make estimates of individual thresholds less reliable. The associated measurement error also obscures group differences. Adaptive procedures with children should therefore use as many reversals as possible, to reduce the effects of both Type 1 and Type 2 errors. Differences in response consistency, resulting from lapses in attention, further increase the over-estimation of threshold. Comparisons between data from individuals who may differ in lapse rate are therefore problematic, but measures to estimate and account for lapse rates in analyses may mitigate this problem. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5429739 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54297392017-05-15 Psychophysical measurements in children: challenges, pitfalls, and considerations Witton, Caroline Talcott, Joel B. Henning, G. Bruce PeerJ Developmental Biology Measuring sensory sensitivity is important in studying development and developmental disorders. However, with children, there is a need to balance reliable but lengthy sensory tasks with the child’s ability to maintain motivation and vigilance. We used simulations to explore the problems associated with shortening adaptive psychophysical procedures, and suggest how these problems might be addressed. We quantify how adaptive procedures with too few reversals can over-estimate thresholds, introduce substantial measurement error, and make estimates of individual thresholds less reliable. The associated measurement error also obscures group differences. Adaptive procedures with children should therefore use as many reversals as possible, to reduce the effects of both Type 1 and Type 2 errors. Differences in response consistency, resulting from lapses in attention, further increase the over-estimation of threshold. Comparisons between data from individuals who may differ in lapse rate are therefore problematic, but measures to estimate and account for lapse rates in analyses may mitigate this problem. PeerJ Inc. 2017-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5429739/ /pubmed/28507816 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3231 Text en ©2017 Witton et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Developmental Biology Witton, Caroline Talcott, Joel B. Henning, G. Bruce Psychophysical measurements in children: challenges, pitfalls, and considerations |
title | Psychophysical measurements in children: challenges, pitfalls, and considerations |
title_full | Psychophysical measurements in children: challenges, pitfalls, and considerations |
title_fullStr | Psychophysical measurements in children: challenges, pitfalls, and considerations |
title_full_unstemmed | Psychophysical measurements in children: challenges, pitfalls, and considerations |
title_short | Psychophysical measurements in children: challenges, pitfalls, and considerations |
title_sort | psychophysical measurements in children: challenges, pitfalls, and considerations |
topic | Developmental Biology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5429739/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28507816 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3231 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wittoncaroline psychophysicalmeasurementsinchildrenchallengespitfallsandconsiderations AT talcottjoelb psychophysicalmeasurementsinchildrenchallengespitfallsandconsiderations AT henninggbruce psychophysicalmeasurementsinchildrenchallengespitfallsandconsiderations |