Cargando…

Body Size Predicts Echolocation Call Peak Frequency Better than Gape Height in Vespertilionid Bats

In most vocalizing vertebrates, lighter animals tend to produce acoustic signals of higher frequency than heavier animals. Two hypotheses propose to explain this negative relationship in vespertilionid bats: (i) mass-signal frequency allometry and (ii) emitter-limited (maximum gape) signal direction...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thiagavel, Jeneni, Santana, Sharlene E., Ratcliffe, John M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5429766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28400604
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00959-2
_version_ 1783236096520355840
author Thiagavel, Jeneni
Santana, Sharlene E.
Ratcliffe, John M.
author_facet Thiagavel, Jeneni
Santana, Sharlene E.
Ratcliffe, John M.
author_sort Thiagavel, Jeneni
collection PubMed
description In most vocalizing vertebrates, lighter animals tend to produce acoustic signals of higher frequency than heavier animals. Two hypotheses propose to explain this negative relationship in vespertilionid bats: (i) mass-signal frequency allometry and (ii) emitter-limited (maximum gape) signal directionality. The first hypothesis, that lighter bats with smaller larynges are constrained to calls with higher frequencies, is supported at the species level. The second hypothesis proposes that in open space, small bats use higher frequencies to achieve narrow sonar beams, as beam directionality increases with both emitter size (maximum gape) and signal frequency. This hypothesis is supported within a comparative context but remains untested beyond a few species. We analyzed gape, body mass, and echolocation data under a phylogenetic comparative framework to test these hypotheses, and considered forearm length as both a proxy for wing design and an alternative measure of bat size. Controlling for mass, we found no support for the directionality hypothesis. Body mass and relative forearm length were negatively related to open space echolocation call peak frequency, reflecting species-specific size differences, but also the influence of wing design and preferred foraging habitat on size-independent species-specific differences in echolocation call design.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5429766
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54297662017-05-15 Body Size Predicts Echolocation Call Peak Frequency Better than Gape Height in Vespertilionid Bats Thiagavel, Jeneni Santana, Sharlene E. Ratcliffe, John M. Sci Rep Article In most vocalizing vertebrates, lighter animals tend to produce acoustic signals of higher frequency than heavier animals. Two hypotheses propose to explain this negative relationship in vespertilionid bats: (i) mass-signal frequency allometry and (ii) emitter-limited (maximum gape) signal directionality. The first hypothesis, that lighter bats with smaller larynges are constrained to calls with higher frequencies, is supported at the species level. The second hypothesis proposes that in open space, small bats use higher frequencies to achieve narrow sonar beams, as beam directionality increases with both emitter size (maximum gape) and signal frequency. This hypothesis is supported within a comparative context but remains untested beyond a few species. We analyzed gape, body mass, and echolocation data under a phylogenetic comparative framework to test these hypotheses, and considered forearm length as both a proxy for wing design and an alternative measure of bat size. Controlling for mass, we found no support for the directionality hypothesis. Body mass and relative forearm length were negatively related to open space echolocation call peak frequency, reflecting species-specific size differences, but also the influence of wing design and preferred foraging habitat on size-independent species-specific differences in echolocation call design. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5429766/ /pubmed/28400604 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00959-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Thiagavel, Jeneni
Santana, Sharlene E.
Ratcliffe, John M.
Body Size Predicts Echolocation Call Peak Frequency Better than Gape Height in Vespertilionid Bats
title Body Size Predicts Echolocation Call Peak Frequency Better than Gape Height in Vespertilionid Bats
title_full Body Size Predicts Echolocation Call Peak Frequency Better than Gape Height in Vespertilionid Bats
title_fullStr Body Size Predicts Echolocation Call Peak Frequency Better than Gape Height in Vespertilionid Bats
title_full_unstemmed Body Size Predicts Echolocation Call Peak Frequency Better than Gape Height in Vespertilionid Bats
title_short Body Size Predicts Echolocation Call Peak Frequency Better than Gape Height in Vespertilionid Bats
title_sort body size predicts echolocation call peak frequency better than gape height in vespertilionid bats
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5429766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28400604
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00959-2
work_keys_str_mv AT thiagaveljeneni bodysizepredictsecholocationcallpeakfrequencybetterthangapeheightinvespertilionidbats
AT santanasharlenee bodysizepredictsecholocationcallpeakfrequencybetterthangapeheightinvespertilionidbats
AT ratcliffejohnm bodysizepredictsecholocationcallpeakfrequencybetterthangapeheightinvespertilionidbats