Cargando…

Impact of image quality on OCT angiography based quantitative measurements

BACKGROUND: To study the impact of image quality on quantitative measurements and the frequency of segmentation error with optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). METHODS: Seventeen eyes of 10 healthy individuals were included in this study. OCTA was performed using a swept-source device (T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al-Sheikh, Mayss, Ghasemi Falavarjani, Khalil, Akil, Handan, Sadda, SriniVas R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5430594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28515959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40942-017-0068-9
_version_ 1783236249319899136
author Al-Sheikh, Mayss
Ghasemi Falavarjani, Khalil
Akil, Handan
Sadda, SriniVas R.
author_facet Al-Sheikh, Mayss
Ghasemi Falavarjani, Khalil
Akil, Handan
Sadda, SriniVas R.
author_sort Al-Sheikh, Mayss
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To study the impact of image quality on quantitative measurements and the frequency of segmentation error with optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). METHODS: Seventeen eyes of 10 healthy individuals were included in this study. OCTA was performed using a swept-source device (Triton, Topcon). Each subject underwent three scanning sessions 1–2 min apart; the first two scans were obtained under standard conditions and for the third session, the image quality index was reduced using application of a topical ointment. En face OCTA images of the retinal vasculature were generated using the default segmentation for the superficial and deep retinal layer (SRL, DRL). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used as a measure for repeatability. The frequency of segmentation error, motion artifact, banding artifact and projection artifact was also compared among the three sessions. RESULTS: The frequency of segmentation error, and motion artifact was statistically similar between high and low image quality sessions (P = 0.707, and P = 1 respectively). However, the frequency of projection and banding artifact was higher with a lower image quality. The vessel density in the SRL was highly repeatable in the high image quality sessions (ICC = 0.8), however, the repeatability was low, comparing the high and low image quality measurements (ICC = 0.3). In the DRL, the repeatability of the vessel density measurements was fair in the high quality sessions (ICC = 0.6 and ICC = 0.5, with and without automatic artifact removal, respectively) and poor comparing high and low image quality sessions (ICC = 0.3 and ICC = 0.06, with and without automatic artifact removal, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of artifacts is higher and the repeatability of the measurements is lower with lower image quality. The impact of image quality index should be always considered in OCTA based quantitative measurements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5430594
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54305942017-05-17 Impact of image quality on OCT angiography based quantitative measurements Al-Sheikh, Mayss Ghasemi Falavarjani, Khalil Akil, Handan Sadda, SriniVas R. Int J Retina Vitreous Original Article BACKGROUND: To study the impact of image quality on quantitative measurements and the frequency of segmentation error with optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). METHODS: Seventeen eyes of 10 healthy individuals were included in this study. OCTA was performed using a swept-source device (Triton, Topcon). Each subject underwent three scanning sessions 1–2 min apart; the first two scans were obtained under standard conditions and for the third session, the image quality index was reduced using application of a topical ointment. En face OCTA images of the retinal vasculature were generated using the default segmentation for the superficial and deep retinal layer (SRL, DRL). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used as a measure for repeatability. The frequency of segmentation error, motion artifact, banding artifact and projection artifact was also compared among the three sessions. RESULTS: The frequency of segmentation error, and motion artifact was statistically similar between high and low image quality sessions (P = 0.707, and P = 1 respectively). However, the frequency of projection and banding artifact was higher with a lower image quality. The vessel density in the SRL was highly repeatable in the high image quality sessions (ICC = 0.8), however, the repeatability was low, comparing the high and low image quality measurements (ICC = 0.3). In the DRL, the repeatability of the vessel density measurements was fair in the high quality sessions (ICC = 0.6 and ICC = 0.5, with and without automatic artifact removal, respectively) and poor comparing high and low image quality sessions (ICC = 0.3 and ICC = 0.06, with and without automatic artifact removal, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of artifacts is higher and the repeatability of the measurements is lower with lower image quality. The impact of image quality index should be always considered in OCTA based quantitative measurements. BioMed Central 2017-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5430594/ /pubmed/28515959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40942-017-0068-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Article
Al-Sheikh, Mayss
Ghasemi Falavarjani, Khalil
Akil, Handan
Sadda, SriniVas R.
Impact of image quality on OCT angiography based quantitative measurements
title Impact of image quality on OCT angiography based quantitative measurements
title_full Impact of image quality on OCT angiography based quantitative measurements
title_fullStr Impact of image quality on OCT angiography based quantitative measurements
title_full_unstemmed Impact of image quality on OCT angiography based quantitative measurements
title_short Impact of image quality on OCT angiography based quantitative measurements
title_sort impact of image quality on oct angiography based quantitative measurements
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5430594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28515959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40942-017-0068-9
work_keys_str_mv AT alsheikhmayss impactofimagequalityonoctangiographybasedquantitativemeasurements
AT ghasemifalavarjanikhalil impactofimagequalityonoctangiographybasedquantitativemeasurements
AT akilhandan impactofimagequalityonoctangiographybasedquantitativemeasurements
AT saddasrinivasr impactofimagequalityonoctangiographybasedquantitativemeasurements