Cargando…

How to test for partially predictable chaos

For a chaotic system pairs of initially close-by trajectories become eventually fully uncorrelated on the attracting set. This process of decorrelation can split into an initial exponential decrease and a subsequent diffusive process on the chaotic attractor causing the final loss of predictability....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wernecke, Hendrik, Sándor, Bulcsú, Gros, Claudius
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5430683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28439074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01083-x
_version_ 1783236269836337152
author Wernecke, Hendrik
Sándor, Bulcsú
Gros, Claudius
author_facet Wernecke, Hendrik
Sándor, Bulcsú
Gros, Claudius
author_sort Wernecke, Hendrik
collection PubMed
description For a chaotic system pairs of initially close-by trajectories become eventually fully uncorrelated on the attracting set. This process of decorrelation can split into an initial exponential decrease and a subsequent diffusive process on the chaotic attractor causing the final loss of predictability. Both processes can be either of the same or of very different time scales. In the latter case the two trajectories linger within a finite but small distance (with respect to the overall extent of the attractor) for exceedingly long times and remain partially predictable. Standard tests for chaos widely use inter-orbital correlations as an indicator. However, testing partially predictable chaos yields mostly ambiguous results, as this type of chaos is characterized by attractors of fractally broadened braids. For a resolution we introduce a novel 0–1 indicator for chaos based on the cross-distance scaling of pairs of initially close trajectories. This test robustly discriminates chaos, including partially predictable chaos, from laminar flow. Additionally using the finite time cross-correlation of pairs of initially close trajectories, we are able to identify laminar flow as well as strong and partially predictable chaos in a 0–1 manner solely from the properties of pairs of trajectories.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5430683
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54306832017-05-16 How to test for partially predictable chaos Wernecke, Hendrik Sándor, Bulcsú Gros, Claudius Sci Rep Article For a chaotic system pairs of initially close-by trajectories become eventually fully uncorrelated on the attracting set. This process of decorrelation can split into an initial exponential decrease and a subsequent diffusive process on the chaotic attractor causing the final loss of predictability. Both processes can be either of the same or of very different time scales. In the latter case the two trajectories linger within a finite but small distance (with respect to the overall extent of the attractor) for exceedingly long times and remain partially predictable. Standard tests for chaos widely use inter-orbital correlations as an indicator. However, testing partially predictable chaos yields mostly ambiguous results, as this type of chaos is characterized by attractors of fractally broadened braids. For a resolution we introduce a novel 0–1 indicator for chaos based on the cross-distance scaling of pairs of initially close trajectories. This test robustly discriminates chaos, including partially predictable chaos, from laminar flow. Additionally using the finite time cross-correlation of pairs of initially close trajectories, we are able to identify laminar flow as well as strong and partially predictable chaos in a 0–1 manner solely from the properties of pairs of trajectories. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5430683/ /pubmed/28439074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01083-x Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Wernecke, Hendrik
Sándor, Bulcsú
Gros, Claudius
How to test for partially predictable chaos
title How to test for partially predictable chaos
title_full How to test for partially predictable chaos
title_fullStr How to test for partially predictable chaos
title_full_unstemmed How to test for partially predictable chaos
title_short How to test for partially predictable chaos
title_sort how to test for partially predictable chaos
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5430683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28439074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01083-x
work_keys_str_mv AT werneckehendrik howtotestforpartiallypredictablechaos
AT sandorbulcsu howtotestforpartiallypredictablechaos
AT grosclaudius howtotestforpartiallypredictablechaos