Cargando…

Tactile Flow Overrides Other Cues To Self Motion

Vestibular-somatosensory interactions are pervasive in the brain but it remains unclear why. Here we explore the contribution of tactile flow to processing self-motion. We assessed two aspects of self-motion: timing and speed. Participants sat on an oscillating swing and either kept their hands on t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harris, Laurence R., Sakurai, Kenzo, Beaudot, William H. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5430733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28432328
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01111-w
_version_ 1783236282963460096
author Harris, Laurence R.
Sakurai, Kenzo
Beaudot, William H. A.
author_facet Harris, Laurence R.
Sakurai, Kenzo
Beaudot, William H. A.
author_sort Harris, Laurence R.
collection PubMed
description Vestibular-somatosensory interactions are pervasive in the brain but it remains unclear why. Here we explore the contribution of tactile flow to processing self-motion. We assessed two aspects of self-motion: timing and speed. Participants sat on an oscillating swing and either kept their hands on their laps or rested them lightly on an earth-stationary surface. They viewed a grating oscillating at the same frequency as their motion and judged its phase or, in a separate experiment, its speed relative to their perceived motion. Participants required the phase to precede body movement (with or without tactile flow) or tactile flow by ~5° (44 ms) to appear earth-stationary. Speed judgments were 4–10% faster when motion was from tactile flow, either alone or with body motion, compared to body motion alone (where speed judgments were accurate). By comparing response variances we conclude that phase and speed judgments do not reflect optimal integration of tactile flow with other cues to body motion: instead tactile flow dominates perceived self-motion – acting as an emergency override. This may explain why even minimal tactile cues are so helpful in promoting stability and suggests that providing artificial tactile cues might be a powerful aid to perceiving self-motion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5430733
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54307332017-05-16 Tactile Flow Overrides Other Cues To Self Motion Harris, Laurence R. Sakurai, Kenzo Beaudot, William H. A. Sci Rep Article Vestibular-somatosensory interactions are pervasive in the brain but it remains unclear why. Here we explore the contribution of tactile flow to processing self-motion. We assessed two aspects of self-motion: timing and speed. Participants sat on an oscillating swing and either kept their hands on their laps or rested them lightly on an earth-stationary surface. They viewed a grating oscillating at the same frequency as their motion and judged its phase or, in a separate experiment, its speed relative to their perceived motion. Participants required the phase to precede body movement (with or without tactile flow) or tactile flow by ~5° (44 ms) to appear earth-stationary. Speed judgments were 4–10% faster when motion was from tactile flow, either alone or with body motion, compared to body motion alone (where speed judgments were accurate). By comparing response variances we conclude that phase and speed judgments do not reflect optimal integration of tactile flow with other cues to body motion: instead tactile flow dominates perceived self-motion – acting as an emergency override. This may explain why even minimal tactile cues are so helpful in promoting stability and suggests that providing artificial tactile cues might be a powerful aid to perceiving self-motion. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5430733/ /pubmed/28432328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01111-w Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Harris, Laurence R.
Sakurai, Kenzo
Beaudot, William H. A.
Tactile Flow Overrides Other Cues To Self Motion
title Tactile Flow Overrides Other Cues To Self Motion
title_full Tactile Flow Overrides Other Cues To Self Motion
title_fullStr Tactile Flow Overrides Other Cues To Self Motion
title_full_unstemmed Tactile Flow Overrides Other Cues To Self Motion
title_short Tactile Flow Overrides Other Cues To Self Motion
title_sort tactile flow overrides other cues to self motion
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5430733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28432328
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01111-w
work_keys_str_mv AT harrislaurencer tactileflowoverridesothercuestoselfmotion
AT sakuraikenzo tactileflowoverridesothercuestoselfmotion
AT beaudotwilliamha tactileflowoverridesothercuestoselfmotion