Cargando…
Tactile Flow Overrides Other Cues To Self Motion
Vestibular-somatosensory interactions are pervasive in the brain but it remains unclear why. Here we explore the contribution of tactile flow to processing self-motion. We assessed two aspects of self-motion: timing and speed. Participants sat on an oscillating swing and either kept their hands on t...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5430733/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28432328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01111-w |
_version_ | 1783236282963460096 |
---|---|
author | Harris, Laurence R. Sakurai, Kenzo Beaudot, William H. A. |
author_facet | Harris, Laurence R. Sakurai, Kenzo Beaudot, William H. A. |
author_sort | Harris, Laurence R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Vestibular-somatosensory interactions are pervasive in the brain but it remains unclear why. Here we explore the contribution of tactile flow to processing self-motion. We assessed two aspects of self-motion: timing and speed. Participants sat on an oscillating swing and either kept their hands on their laps or rested them lightly on an earth-stationary surface. They viewed a grating oscillating at the same frequency as their motion and judged its phase or, in a separate experiment, its speed relative to their perceived motion. Participants required the phase to precede body movement (with or without tactile flow) or tactile flow by ~5° (44 ms) to appear earth-stationary. Speed judgments were 4–10% faster when motion was from tactile flow, either alone or with body motion, compared to body motion alone (where speed judgments were accurate). By comparing response variances we conclude that phase and speed judgments do not reflect optimal integration of tactile flow with other cues to body motion: instead tactile flow dominates perceived self-motion – acting as an emergency override. This may explain why even minimal tactile cues are so helpful in promoting stability and suggests that providing artificial tactile cues might be a powerful aid to perceiving self-motion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5430733 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54307332017-05-16 Tactile Flow Overrides Other Cues To Self Motion Harris, Laurence R. Sakurai, Kenzo Beaudot, William H. A. Sci Rep Article Vestibular-somatosensory interactions are pervasive in the brain but it remains unclear why. Here we explore the contribution of tactile flow to processing self-motion. We assessed two aspects of self-motion: timing and speed. Participants sat on an oscillating swing and either kept their hands on their laps or rested them lightly on an earth-stationary surface. They viewed a grating oscillating at the same frequency as their motion and judged its phase or, in a separate experiment, its speed relative to their perceived motion. Participants required the phase to precede body movement (with or without tactile flow) or tactile flow by ~5° (44 ms) to appear earth-stationary. Speed judgments were 4–10% faster when motion was from tactile flow, either alone or with body motion, compared to body motion alone (where speed judgments were accurate). By comparing response variances we conclude that phase and speed judgments do not reflect optimal integration of tactile flow with other cues to body motion: instead tactile flow dominates perceived self-motion – acting as an emergency override. This may explain why even minimal tactile cues are so helpful in promoting stability and suggests that providing artificial tactile cues might be a powerful aid to perceiving self-motion. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5430733/ /pubmed/28432328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01111-w Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Harris, Laurence R. Sakurai, Kenzo Beaudot, William H. A. Tactile Flow Overrides Other Cues To Self Motion |
title | Tactile Flow Overrides Other Cues To Self Motion |
title_full | Tactile Flow Overrides Other Cues To Self Motion |
title_fullStr | Tactile Flow Overrides Other Cues To Self Motion |
title_full_unstemmed | Tactile Flow Overrides Other Cues To Self Motion |
title_short | Tactile Flow Overrides Other Cues To Self Motion |
title_sort | tactile flow overrides other cues to self motion |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5430733/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28432328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01111-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT harrislaurencer tactileflowoverridesothercuestoselfmotion AT sakuraikenzo tactileflowoverridesothercuestoselfmotion AT beaudotwilliamha tactileflowoverridesothercuestoselfmotion |