Cargando…

Efficacy of Different Root Canal Irrigants on Smear Layer Removal after Post Space Preparation: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Evaluation

INTRODUCTION: Effective durable adhesion between post material and dentine using resin cements is essential for longevity of restoration. The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the effect of different irrigants on smear layer removal after post space preparation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A tota...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mirseifinejad, Rahele, Tabrizizade, Mehdi, Davari, Abdolrahim, Mehravar, Fateme
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iranian Center for Endodontic Research 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5431723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28512483
http://dx.doi.org/10.22037/iej.2017.36
_version_ 1783236488752791552
author Mirseifinejad, Rahele
Tabrizizade, Mehdi
Davari, Abdolrahim
Mehravar, Fateme
author_facet Mirseifinejad, Rahele
Tabrizizade, Mehdi
Davari, Abdolrahim
Mehravar, Fateme
author_sort Mirseifinejad, Rahele
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Effective durable adhesion between post material and dentine using resin cements is essential for longevity of restoration. The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the effect of different irrigants on smear layer removal after post space preparation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 75 extracted anterior human teeth were selected. The canals were instrumented by rotary system and then were filled. After preparing the post space, teeth were divided into 5 groups according to irrigants: 17% EDTA; 17% EDTA+2% CHX; 5.25% NaOCl; 17% EDTA+5.25% NaOCl; and saline. The canals were irrigated with 5 cc of each irrigants for 1 min. Specimens were examined with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Hulsmann’s score was used for marking of smear layer removal at coronal, middle and apical thirds of post space. The data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: The results revealed that subsequent use of 17% EDTA+5.25% NaOCl was more effective than the other groups in smear layer removal. No statistical difference was found among different levels of root canal within each group. CONCLUSION: It can be concluded that 17% EDTA+5.25% NaOCl could be an effective irrigant for smear layer removal after post space preparation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5431723
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Iranian Center for Endodontic Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54317232017-05-16 Efficacy of Different Root Canal Irrigants on Smear Layer Removal after Post Space Preparation: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Evaluation Mirseifinejad, Rahele Tabrizizade, Mehdi Davari, Abdolrahim Mehravar, Fateme Iran Endod J Original Article INTRODUCTION: Effective durable adhesion between post material and dentine using resin cements is essential for longevity of restoration. The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the effect of different irrigants on smear layer removal after post space preparation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 75 extracted anterior human teeth were selected. The canals were instrumented by rotary system and then were filled. After preparing the post space, teeth were divided into 5 groups according to irrigants: 17% EDTA; 17% EDTA+2% CHX; 5.25% NaOCl; 17% EDTA+5.25% NaOCl; and saline. The canals were irrigated with 5 cc of each irrigants for 1 min. Specimens were examined with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Hulsmann’s score was used for marking of smear layer removal at coronal, middle and apical thirds of post space. The data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: The results revealed that subsequent use of 17% EDTA+5.25% NaOCl was more effective than the other groups in smear layer removal. No statistical difference was found among different levels of root canal within each group. CONCLUSION: It can be concluded that 17% EDTA+5.25% NaOCl could be an effective irrigant for smear layer removal after post space preparation. Iranian Center for Endodontic Research 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5431723/ /pubmed/28512483 http://dx.doi.org/10.22037/iej.2017.36 Text en This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mirseifinejad, Rahele
Tabrizizade, Mehdi
Davari, Abdolrahim
Mehravar, Fateme
Efficacy of Different Root Canal Irrigants on Smear Layer Removal after Post Space Preparation: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Evaluation
title Efficacy of Different Root Canal Irrigants on Smear Layer Removal after Post Space Preparation: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Evaluation
title_full Efficacy of Different Root Canal Irrigants on Smear Layer Removal after Post Space Preparation: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Evaluation
title_fullStr Efficacy of Different Root Canal Irrigants on Smear Layer Removal after Post Space Preparation: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Different Root Canal Irrigants on Smear Layer Removal after Post Space Preparation: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Evaluation
title_short Efficacy of Different Root Canal Irrigants on Smear Layer Removal after Post Space Preparation: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Evaluation
title_sort efficacy of different root canal irrigants on smear layer removal after post space preparation: a scanning electron microscopy evaluation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5431723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28512483
http://dx.doi.org/10.22037/iej.2017.36
work_keys_str_mv AT mirseifinejadrahele efficacyofdifferentrootcanalirrigantsonsmearlayerremovalafterpostspacepreparationascanningelectronmicroscopyevaluation
AT tabrizizademehdi efficacyofdifferentrootcanalirrigantsonsmearlayerremovalafterpostspacepreparationascanningelectronmicroscopyevaluation
AT davariabdolrahim efficacyofdifferentrootcanalirrigantsonsmearlayerremovalafterpostspacepreparationascanningelectronmicroscopyevaluation
AT mehravarfateme efficacyofdifferentrootcanalirrigantsonsmearlayerremovalafterpostspacepreparationascanningelectronmicroscopyevaluation