Cargando…
Sexual homomorphism in dioecious trees: extensive tests fail to detect sexual dimorphism in Populus
The evolution of sexual dimorphism and expansion of sex chromosomes are both driven through sexual conflict, arising from differing fitness optima between males and females. Here, we pair work in poplar (Populus) describing one of the smallest sex-determining regions known thus far in complex eukary...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5431824/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28500332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01893-z |
_version_ | 1783236512133939200 |
---|---|
author | McKown, Athena D. Klápště, Jaroslav Guy, Robert D. Soolanayakanahally, Raju Y. La Mantia, Jonathan Porth, Ilga Skyba, Oleksandr Unda, Faride Douglas, Carl J. El-Kassaby, Yousry A. Hamelin, Richard C. Mansfield, Shawn D. Cronk, Quentin C. B. |
author_facet | McKown, Athena D. Klápště, Jaroslav Guy, Robert D. Soolanayakanahally, Raju Y. La Mantia, Jonathan Porth, Ilga Skyba, Oleksandr Unda, Faride Douglas, Carl J. El-Kassaby, Yousry A. Hamelin, Richard C. Mansfield, Shawn D. Cronk, Quentin C. B. |
author_sort | McKown, Athena D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The evolution of sexual dimorphism and expansion of sex chromosomes are both driven through sexual conflict, arising from differing fitness optima between males and females. Here, we pair work in poplar (Populus) describing one of the smallest sex-determining regions known thus far in complex eukaryotes (~100 kbp) with comprehensive tests for sexual dimorphism using >1300 individuals from two Populus species and assessing 96 non-reproductive functional traits. Against expectation, we found sexual homomorphism (no non-reproductive trait differences between the sexes), suggesting that gender is functionally neutral with respect to non-reproductive features that affect plant survival and fitness. Combined with a small sex-determining region, we infer that sexual conflict may be effectively stymied or non-existent within these taxa. Both sexual homomorphism and the small sex-determining region occur against a background of strong environmental selection and local adaptation in Populus. This presents a powerful hypothesis for the evolution of dioecious species. Here, we suggest that environmental selection may be sufficient to suppress and stymy sexual conflict if it acts orthogonal to sexual selection, thereby placing limitations on the evolution of sexual dimorphism and genomic expansion of sex chromosomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5431824 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54318242017-05-16 Sexual homomorphism in dioecious trees: extensive tests fail to detect sexual dimorphism in Populus McKown, Athena D. Klápště, Jaroslav Guy, Robert D. Soolanayakanahally, Raju Y. La Mantia, Jonathan Porth, Ilga Skyba, Oleksandr Unda, Faride Douglas, Carl J. El-Kassaby, Yousry A. Hamelin, Richard C. Mansfield, Shawn D. Cronk, Quentin C. B. Sci Rep Article The evolution of sexual dimorphism and expansion of sex chromosomes are both driven through sexual conflict, arising from differing fitness optima between males and females. Here, we pair work in poplar (Populus) describing one of the smallest sex-determining regions known thus far in complex eukaryotes (~100 kbp) with comprehensive tests for sexual dimorphism using >1300 individuals from two Populus species and assessing 96 non-reproductive functional traits. Against expectation, we found sexual homomorphism (no non-reproductive trait differences between the sexes), suggesting that gender is functionally neutral with respect to non-reproductive features that affect plant survival and fitness. Combined with a small sex-determining region, we infer that sexual conflict may be effectively stymied or non-existent within these taxa. Both sexual homomorphism and the small sex-determining region occur against a background of strong environmental selection and local adaptation in Populus. This presents a powerful hypothesis for the evolution of dioecious species. Here, we suggest that environmental selection may be sufficient to suppress and stymy sexual conflict if it acts orthogonal to sexual selection, thereby placing limitations on the evolution of sexual dimorphism and genomic expansion of sex chromosomes. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5431824/ /pubmed/28500332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01893-z Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article McKown, Athena D. Klápště, Jaroslav Guy, Robert D. Soolanayakanahally, Raju Y. La Mantia, Jonathan Porth, Ilga Skyba, Oleksandr Unda, Faride Douglas, Carl J. El-Kassaby, Yousry A. Hamelin, Richard C. Mansfield, Shawn D. Cronk, Quentin C. B. Sexual homomorphism in dioecious trees: extensive tests fail to detect sexual dimorphism in Populus |
title | Sexual homomorphism in dioecious trees: extensive tests fail to detect sexual dimorphism in Populus |
title_full | Sexual homomorphism in dioecious trees: extensive tests fail to detect sexual dimorphism in Populus |
title_fullStr | Sexual homomorphism in dioecious trees: extensive tests fail to detect sexual dimorphism in Populus |
title_full_unstemmed | Sexual homomorphism in dioecious trees: extensive tests fail to detect sexual dimorphism in Populus |
title_short | Sexual homomorphism in dioecious trees: extensive tests fail to detect sexual dimorphism in Populus |
title_sort | sexual homomorphism in dioecious trees: extensive tests fail to detect sexual dimorphism in populus |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5431824/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28500332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01893-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mckownathenad sexualhomomorphismindioecioustreesextensivetestsfailtodetectsexualdimorphisminpopulus AT klapstejaroslav sexualhomomorphismindioecioustreesextensivetestsfailtodetectsexualdimorphisminpopulus AT guyrobertd sexualhomomorphismindioecioustreesextensivetestsfailtodetectsexualdimorphisminpopulus AT soolanayakanahallyrajuy sexualhomomorphismindioecioustreesextensivetestsfailtodetectsexualdimorphisminpopulus AT lamantiajonathan sexualhomomorphismindioecioustreesextensivetestsfailtodetectsexualdimorphisminpopulus AT porthilga sexualhomomorphismindioecioustreesextensivetestsfailtodetectsexualdimorphisminpopulus AT skybaoleksandr sexualhomomorphismindioecioustreesextensivetestsfailtodetectsexualdimorphisminpopulus AT undafaride sexualhomomorphismindioecioustreesextensivetestsfailtodetectsexualdimorphisminpopulus AT douglascarlj sexualhomomorphismindioecioustreesextensivetestsfailtodetectsexualdimorphisminpopulus AT elkassabyyousrya sexualhomomorphismindioecioustreesextensivetestsfailtodetectsexualdimorphisminpopulus AT hamelinrichardc sexualhomomorphismindioecioustreesextensivetestsfailtodetectsexualdimorphisminpopulus AT mansfieldshawnd sexualhomomorphismindioecioustreesextensivetestsfailtodetectsexualdimorphisminpopulus AT cronkquentincb sexualhomomorphismindioecioustreesextensivetestsfailtodetectsexualdimorphisminpopulus |