Cargando…

Comparison of masticatory efficiency according to Angle's classification of malocclusion

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the differences in masticatory efficiency among patients with different Angle's classes of malocclusion and to assess the correlation between masticatory efficiency and the occlusal contact area. METHODS: The mixing ability index (MAI) w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bae, Jungin, Son, Woo-Sung, Kim, Seong-Sik, Park, Soo-Byung, Kim, Yong-Il
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Association of Orthodontists 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5432436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28523241
http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2017.47.3.151
_version_ 1783236625773363200
author Bae, Jungin
Son, Woo-Sung
Kim, Seong-Sik
Park, Soo-Byung
Kim, Yong-Il
author_facet Bae, Jungin
Son, Woo-Sung
Kim, Seong-Sik
Park, Soo-Byung
Kim, Yong-Il
author_sort Bae, Jungin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the differences in masticatory efficiency among patients with different Angle's classes of malocclusion and to assess the correlation between masticatory efficiency and the occlusal contact area. METHODS: The mixing ability index (MAI) was calculated for measuring masticatory efficiency of 61 adult patients according to Angle's classifications of malocclusion. The study included 25, 15, and 21 patients with Angle's Class I, II, and III malocclusions, respectively. Silicone interocclusal recording material was used to measure the occlusal contact area. RESULTS: Both the MAI and occlusal contact area showed the highest average values in the Class I malocclusion group, followed by the Class II and Class III malocclusion groups. No significant difference was observed in the MAI values between the Class I and Class II malocclusion groups (p > 0.05), whereas a significant difference was observed between the Class I and Class III malocclusion groups (p < 0.01) and between the Class II and Class III malocclusion groups (p < 0.05). A weak positive correlation was also observed between the MAI and occlusal contact area (p < 0.01, r(2) = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicated that masticatory efficiency was the highest in patients with Angle's Class I malocclusion, followed by those with Angle's Class II and Angle's Class III malocclusions. Moreover, a weak positive correlation was observed between masticatory efficiency and the occlusal contact area.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5432436
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Korean Association of Orthodontists
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54324362017-05-18 Comparison of masticatory efficiency according to Angle's classification of malocclusion Bae, Jungin Son, Woo-Sung Kim, Seong-Sik Park, Soo-Byung Kim, Yong-Il Korean J Orthod Original Article OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the differences in masticatory efficiency among patients with different Angle's classes of malocclusion and to assess the correlation between masticatory efficiency and the occlusal contact area. METHODS: The mixing ability index (MAI) was calculated for measuring masticatory efficiency of 61 adult patients according to Angle's classifications of malocclusion. The study included 25, 15, and 21 patients with Angle's Class I, II, and III malocclusions, respectively. Silicone interocclusal recording material was used to measure the occlusal contact area. RESULTS: Both the MAI and occlusal contact area showed the highest average values in the Class I malocclusion group, followed by the Class II and Class III malocclusion groups. No significant difference was observed in the MAI values between the Class I and Class II malocclusion groups (p > 0.05), whereas a significant difference was observed between the Class I and Class III malocclusion groups (p < 0.01) and between the Class II and Class III malocclusion groups (p < 0.05). A weak positive correlation was also observed between the MAI and occlusal contact area (p < 0.01, r(2) = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicated that masticatory efficiency was the highest in patients with Angle's Class I malocclusion, followed by those with Angle's Class II and Angle's Class III malocclusions. Moreover, a weak positive correlation was observed between masticatory efficiency and the occlusal contact area. Korean Association of Orthodontists 2017-05 2017-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5432436/ /pubmed/28523241 http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2017.47.3.151 Text en © 2017 The Korean Association of Orthodontists. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bae, Jungin
Son, Woo-Sung
Kim, Seong-Sik
Park, Soo-Byung
Kim, Yong-Il
Comparison of masticatory efficiency according to Angle's classification of malocclusion
title Comparison of masticatory efficiency according to Angle's classification of malocclusion
title_full Comparison of masticatory efficiency according to Angle's classification of malocclusion
title_fullStr Comparison of masticatory efficiency according to Angle's classification of malocclusion
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of masticatory efficiency according to Angle's classification of malocclusion
title_short Comparison of masticatory efficiency according to Angle's classification of malocclusion
title_sort comparison of masticatory efficiency according to angle's classification of malocclusion
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5432436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28523241
http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2017.47.3.151
work_keys_str_mv AT baejungin comparisonofmasticatoryefficiencyaccordingtoanglesclassificationofmalocclusion
AT sonwoosung comparisonofmasticatoryefficiencyaccordingtoanglesclassificationofmalocclusion
AT kimseongsik comparisonofmasticatoryefficiencyaccordingtoanglesclassificationofmalocclusion
AT parksoobyung comparisonofmasticatoryefficiencyaccordingtoanglesclassificationofmalocclusion
AT kimyongil comparisonofmasticatoryefficiencyaccordingtoanglesclassificationofmalocclusion