Cargando…

EEG and Eye Tracking Signatures of Target Encoding during Structured Visual Search

EEG and eye tracking variables are potential sources of information about the underlying processes of target detection and storage during visual search. Fixation duration, pupil size and event related potentials (ERPs) locked to the onset of fixation or saccade (saccade-related potentials, SRPs) hav...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brouwer, Anne-Marie, Hogervorst, Maarten A., Oudejans, Bob, Ries, Anthony J., Touryan, Jonathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5432541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28559807
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00264
_version_ 1783236649703964672
author Brouwer, Anne-Marie
Hogervorst, Maarten A.
Oudejans, Bob
Ries, Anthony J.
Touryan, Jonathan
author_facet Brouwer, Anne-Marie
Hogervorst, Maarten A.
Oudejans, Bob
Ries, Anthony J.
Touryan, Jonathan
author_sort Brouwer, Anne-Marie
collection PubMed
description EEG and eye tracking variables are potential sources of information about the underlying processes of target detection and storage during visual search. Fixation duration, pupil size and event related potentials (ERPs) locked to the onset of fixation or saccade (saccade-related potentials, SRPs) have been reported to differ dependent on whether a target or a non-target is currently fixated. Here we focus on the question of whether these variables also differ between targets that are subsequently reported (hits) and targets that are not (misses). Observers were asked to scan 15 locations that were consecutively highlighted for 1 s in pseudo-random order. Highlighted locations displayed either a target or a non-target stimulus with two, three or four targets per trial. After scanning, participants indicated which locations had displayed a target. To induce memory encoding failures, participants concurrently performed an aurally presented math task (high load condition). In a low load condition, participants ignored the math task. As expected, more targets were missed in the high compared with the low load condition. For both conditions, eye tracking features distinguished better between hits and misses than between targets and non-targets (with larger pupil size and shorter fixations for missed compared with correctly encoded targets). In contrast, SRP features distinguished better between targets and non-targets than between hits and misses (with average SRPs showing larger P300 waveforms for targets than for non-targets). Single trial classification results were consistent with these averages. This work suggests complementary contributions of eye and EEG measures in potential applications to support search and detect tasks. SRPs may be useful to monitor what objects are relevant to an observer, and eye variables may indicate whether the observer should be reminded of them later.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5432541
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54325412017-05-30 EEG and Eye Tracking Signatures of Target Encoding during Structured Visual Search Brouwer, Anne-Marie Hogervorst, Maarten A. Oudejans, Bob Ries, Anthony J. Touryan, Jonathan Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience EEG and eye tracking variables are potential sources of information about the underlying processes of target detection and storage during visual search. Fixation duration, pupil size and event related potentials (ERPs) locked to the onset of fixation or saccade (saccade-related potentials, SRPs) have been reported to differ dependent on whether a target or a non-target is currently fixated. Here we focus on the question of whether these variables also differ between targets that are subsequently reported (hits) and targets that are not (misses). Observers were asked to scan 15 locations that were consecutively highlighted for 1 s in pseudo-random order. Highlighted locations displayed either a target or a non-target stimulus with two, three or four targets per trial. After scanning, participants indicated which locations had displayed a target. To induce memory encoding failures, participants concurrently performed an aurally presented math task (high load condition). In a low load condition, participants ignored the math task. As expected, more targets were missed in the high compared with the low load condition. For both conditions, eye tracking features distinguished better between hits and misses than between targets and non-targets (with larger pupil size and shorter fixations for missed compared with correctly encoded targets). In contrast, SRP features distinguished better between targets and non-targets than between hits and misses (with average SRPs showing larger P300 waveforms for targets than for non-targets). Single trial classification results were consistent with these averages. This work suggests complementary contributions of eye and EEG measures in potential applications to support search and detect tasks. SRPs may be useful to monitor what objects are relevant to an observer, and eye variables may indicate whether the observer should be reminded of them later. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5432541/ /pubmed/28559807 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00264 Text en Copyright © 2017 Brouwer, Hogervorst, Oudejans, Ries and Touryan. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Brouwer, Anne-Marie
Hogervorst, Maarten A.
Oudejans, Bob
Ries, Anthony J.
Touryan, Jonathan
EEG and Eye Tracking Signatures of Target Encoding during Structured Visual Search
title EEG and Eye Tracking Signatures of Target Encoding during Structured Visual Search
title_full EEG and Eye Tracking Signatures of Target Encoding during Structured Visual Search
title_fullStr EEG and Eye Tracking Signatures of Target Encoding during Structured Visual Search
title_full_unstemmed EEG and Eye Tracking Signatures of Target Encoding during Structured Visual Search
title_short EEG and Eye Tracking Signatures of Target Encoding during Structured Visual Search
title_sort eeg and eye tracking signatures of target encoding during structured visual search
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5432541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28559807
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00264
work_keys_str_mv AT brouwerannemarie eegandeyetrackingsignaturesoftargetencodingduringstructuredvisualsearch
AT hogervorstmaartena eegandeyetrackingsignaturesoftargetencodingduringstructuredvisualsearch
AT oudejansbob eegandeyetrackingsignaturesoftargetencodingduringstructuredvisualsearch
AT riesanthonyj eegandeyetrackingsignaturesoftargetencodingduringstructuredvisualsearch
AT touryanjonathan eegandeyetrackingsignaturesoftargetencodingduringstructuredvisualsearch