Cargando…

Grapevine acclimation to water deficit: the adjustment of stomatal and hydraulic conductance differs from petiole embolism vulnerability

Drought-acclimated vines maintained higher gas exchange compared to irrigated controls under water deficit; this effect is associated with modified leaf turgor but not with improved petiole vulnerability to cavitation. A key feature for the prosperity of plants under changing environments is the pla...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hochberg, Uri, Bonel, Andrea Giulia, David-Schwartz, Rakefet, Degu, Asfaw, Fait, Aaron, Cochard, Hervé, Peterlunger, Enrico, Herrera, Jose Carlos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5432590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28214919
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00425-017-2662-3
_version_ 1783236662921265152
author Hochberg, Uri
Bonel, Andrea Giulia
David-Schwartz, Rakefet
Degu, Asfaw
Fait, Aaron
Cochard, Hervé
Peterlunger, Enrico
Herrera, Jose Carlos
author_facet Hochberg, Uri
Bonel, Andrea Giulia
David-Schwartz, Rakefet
Degu, Asfaw
Fait, Aaron
Cochard, Hervé
Peterlunger, Enrico
Herrera, Jose Carlos
author_sort Hochberg, Uri
collection PubMed
description Drought-acclimated vines maintained higher gas exchange compared to irrigated controls under water deficit; this effect is associated with modified leaf turgor but not with improved petiole vulnerability to cavitation. A key feature for the prosperity of plants under changing environments is the plasticity of their hydraulic system. In the present research we studied the hydraulic regulation in grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.) that were first acclimated for 39 days to well-watered (WW), sustained water deficit (SD), or transient—cycles of dehydration–rehydration—water deficit (TD) conditions, and then subjected to varying degrees of drought. Vine development under SD led to the smallest leaves and petioles, but the TD vines had the smallest mean xylem vessel and calculated specific conductivity (k (ts)). Unexpectedly, both the water deficit acclimation treatments resulted in vines more vulnerable to cavitation in comparison to WW, possibly as a result of developmental differences or cavitation fatigue. When exposed to drought, the SD vines maintained the highest stomatal (g (s)) and leaf conductance (k (leaf)) under low stem water potential (Ψ(s)), despite their high xylem vulnerability and in agreement with their lower turgor loss point (Ψ(TLP)). These findings suggest that the down-regulation of k (leaf) and g (s) is not associated with embolism, and the ability of drought-acclimated vines to maintain hydraulic conductance and gas exchange under stressed conditions is more likely associated with the leaf turgor and membrane permeability. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00425-017-2662-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5432590
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54325902017-05-31 Grapevine acclimation to water deficit: the adjustment of stomatal and hydraulic conductance differs from petiole embolism vulnerability Hochberg, Uri Bonel, Andrea Giulia David-Schwartz, Rakefet Degu, Asfaw Fait, Aaron Cochard, Hervé Peterlunger, Enrico Herrera, Jose Carlos Planta Original Article Drought-acclimated vines maintained higher gas exchange compared to irrigated controls under water deficit; this effect is associated with modified leaf turgor but not with improved petiole vulnerability to cavitation. A key feature for the prosperity of plants under changing environments is the plasticity of their hydraulic system. In the present research we studied the hydraulic regulation in grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.) that were first acclimated for 39 days to well-watered (WW), sustained water deficit (SD), or transient—cycles of dehydration–rehydration—water deficit (TD) conditions, and then subjected to varying degrees of drought. Vine development under SD led to the smallest leaves and petioles, but the TD vines had the smallest mean xylem vessel and calculated specific conductivity (k (ts)). Unexpectedly, both the water deficit acclimation treatments resulted in vines more vulnerable to cavitation in comparison to WW, possibly as a result of developmental differences or cavitation fatigue. When exposed to drought, the SD vines maintained the highest stomatal (g (s)) and leaf conductance (k (leaf)) under low stem water potential (Ψ(s)), despite their high xylem vulnerability and in agreement with their lower turgor loss point (Ψ(TLP)). These findings suggest that the down-regulation of k (leaf) and g (s) is not associated with embolism, and the ability of drought-acclimated vines to maintain hydraulic conductance and gas exchange under stressed conditions is more likely associated with the leaf turgor and membrane permeability. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00425-017-2662-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-02-18 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5432590/ /pubmed/28214919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00425-017-2662-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hochberg, Uri
Bonel, Andrea Giulia
David-Schwartz, Rakefet
Degu, Asfaw
Fait, Aaron
Cochard, Hervé
Peterlunger, Enrico
Herrera, Jose Carlos
Grapevine acclimation to water deficit: the adjustment of stomatal and hydraulic conductance differs from petiole embolism vulnerability
title Grapevine acclimation to water deficit: the adjustment of stomatal and hydraulic conductance differs from petiole embolism vulnerability
title_full Grapevine acclimation to water deficit: the adjustment of stomatal and hydraulic conductance differs from petiole embolism vulnerability
title_fullStr Grapevine acclimation to water deficit: the adjustment of stomatal and hydraulic conductance differs from petiole embolism vulnerability
title_full_unstemmed Grapevine acclimation to water deficit: the adjustment of stomatal and hydraulic conductance differs from petiole embolism vulnerability
title_short Grapevine acclimation to water deficit: the adjustment of stomatal and hydraulic conductance differs from petiole embolism vulnerability
title_sort grapevine acclimation to water deficit: the adjustment of stomatal and hydraulic conductance differs from petiole embolism vulnerability
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5432590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28214919
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00425-017-2662-3
work_keys_str_mv AT hochberguri grapevineacclimationtowaterdeficittheadjustmentofstomatalandhydraulicconductancediffersfrompetioleembolismvulnerability
AT bonelandreagiulia grapevineacclimationtowaterdeficittheadjustmentofstomatalandhydraulicconductancediffersfrompetioleembolismvulnerability
AT davidschwartzrakefet grapevineacclimationtowaterdeficittheadjustmentofstomatalandhydraulicconductancediffersfrompetioleembolismvulnerability
AT deguasfaw grapevineacclimationtowaterdeficittheadjustmentofstomatalandhydraulicconductancediffersfrompetioleembolismvulnerability
AT faitaaron grapevineacclimationtowaterdeficittheadjustmentofstomatalandhydraulicconductancediffersfrompetioleembolismvulnerability
AT cochardherve grapevineacclimationtowaterdeficittheadjustmentofstomatalandhydraulicconductancediffersfrompetioleembolismvulnerability
AT peterlungerenrico grapevineacclimationtowaterdeficittheadjustmentofstomatalandhydraulicconductancediffersfrompetioleembolismvulnerability
AT herrerajosecarlos grapevineacclimationtowaterdeficittheadjustmentofstomatalandhydraulicconductancediffersfrompetioleembolismvulnerability