Cargando…
Lifestyle interventions are feasible in patients with colorectal cancer with potential short-term health benefits: a systematic review
PURPOSE: Lifestyle interventions have been proposed to improve cancer survivorship in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), but with treatment pathways becoming increasingly multi-modal and prolonged, opportunities for interventions may be limited. This systematic review assessed the evidence for t...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5432596/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28374148 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-017-2797-5 |
_version_ | 1783236664423874560 |
---|---|
author | Moug, Susan J. Bryce, Adam Mutrie, Nanette Anderson, Annie S. |
author_facet | Moug, Susan J. Bryce, Adam Mutrie, Nanette Anderson, Annie S. |
author_sort | Moug, Susan J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Lifestyle interventions have been proposed to improve cancer survivorship in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), but with treatment pathways becoming increasingly multi-modal and prolonged, opportunities for interventions may be limited. This systematic review assessed the evidence for the feasibility of performing lifestyle interventions in CRC patients and evaluated any short- and long-term health benefits. METHODS: Using PRISMA Guidelines, selected keywords identified randomised controlled studies (RCTs) of lifestyle interventions [smoking, alcohol, physical activity (PA) and diet/excess body weight] in CRC patients. These electronic databases were searched in June 2015: Dynamed, Cochrane Database, OVID MEDLINE, OVID EMBASE, and PEDro. RESULTS: Fourteen RCTs were identified: PA RCTs (n = 10) consisted mainly of telephone-prompted walking or cycling interventions of varied durations, predominately in adjuvant setting; dietary/excess weight interventions RCTs (n = 4) focused on low-fat and/or high-fibre diets within a multi-modal lifestyle intervention. There were no reported RCTs in smoking or alcohol cessation/reduction. PA and/or dietary/excess weight interventions reported variable recruitment rates, but good adherence and retention/follow-up rates, leading to short-term improvements in dietary quality, physical, psychological and quality-of-life parameters. Only one study assessed long-term follow-up, finding significantly improved cancer-specific survival after dietary intervention. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first systematic review on lifestyle interventions in patients with CRC finding these interventions to be feasible with improvements in short-term health. Future work should focus on defining the optimal type of intervention (type, duration, timing and intensity) that not only leads to improved short-term outcomes but also assesses long-term survival. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5432596 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54325962017-05-31 Lifestyle interventions are feasible in patients with colorectal cancer with potential short-term health benefits: a systematic review Moug, Susan J. Bryce, Adam Mutrie, Nanette Anderson, Annie S. Int J Colorectal Dis Review PURPOSE: Lifestyle interventions have been proposed to improve cancer survivorship in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), but with treatment pathways becoming increasingly multi-modal and prolonged, opportunities for interventions may be limited. This systematic review assessed the evidence for the feasibility of performing lifestyle interventions in CRC patients and evaluated any short- and long-term health benefits. METHODS: Using PRISMA Guidelines, selected keywords identified randomised controlled studies (RCTs) of lifestyle interventions [smoking, alcohol, physical activity (PA) and diet/excess body weight] in CRC patients. These electronic databases were searched in June 2015: Dynamed, Cochrane Database, OVID MEDLINE, OVID EMBASE, and PEDro. RESULTS: Fourteen RCTs were identified: PA RCTs (n = 10) consisted mainly of telephone-prompted walking or cycling interventions of varied durations, predominately in adjuvant setting; dietary/excess weight interventions RCTs (n = 4) focused on low-fat and/or high-fibre diets within a multi-modal lifestyle intervention. There were no reported RCTs in smoking or alcohol cessation/reduction. PA and/or dietary/excess weight interventions reported variable recruitment rates, but good adherence and retention/follow-up rates, leading to short-term improvements in dietary quality, physical, psychological and quality-of-life parameters. Only one study assessed long-term follow-up, finding significantly improved cancer-specific survival after dietary intervention. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first systematic review on lifestyle interventions in patients with CRC finding these interventions to be feasible with improvements in short-term health. Future work should focus on defining the optimal type of intervention (type, duration, timing and intensity) that not only leads to improved short-term outcomes but also assesses long-term survival. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-04-03 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5432596/ /pubmed/28374148 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-017-2797-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review Moug, Susan J. Bryce, Adam Mutrie, Nanette Anderson, Annie S. Lifestyle interventions are feasible in patients with colorectal cancer with potential short-term health benefits: a systematic review |
title | Lifestyle interventions are feasible in patients with colorectal cancer with potential short-term health benefits: a systematic review |
title_full | Lifestyle interventions are feasible in patients with colorectal cancer with potential short-term health benefits: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Lifestyle interventions are feasible in patients with colorectal cancer with potential short-term health benefits: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Lifestyle interventions are feasible in patients with colorectal cancer with potential short-term health benefits: a systematic review |
title_short | Lifestyle interventions are feasible in patients with colorectal cancer with potential short-term health benefits: a systematic review |
title_sort | lifestyle interventions are feasible in patients with colorectal cancer with potential short-term health benefits: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5432596/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28374148 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-017-2797-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mougsusanj lifestyleinterventionsarefeasibleinpatientswithcolorectalcancerwithpotentialshorttermhealthbenefitsasystematicreview AT bryceadam lifestyleinterventionsarefeasibleinpatientswithcolorectalcancerwithpotentialshorttermhealthbenefitsasystematicreview AT mutrienanette lifestyleinterventionsarefeasibleinpatientswithcolorectalcancerwithpotentialshorttermhealthbenefitsasystematicreview AT andersonannies lifestyleinterventionsarefeasibleinpatientswithcolorectalcancerwithpotentialshorttermhealthbenefitsasystematicreview |