Cargando…

Comparative efficacy of biological agents in methotrexate-refractory rheumatoid arthritis patients: a Bayesian mixed treatment comparison

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Biological agents (biologics) targeting proinflammatory signaling have emerged as an important treatment option in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Despite the clinical effectiveness of biologics for patients with RA who do not respond to ‘traditional’ disease-modifying anti-rheumatic dru...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Miyoung, Hyun, Min Kyung, Choi, Seongmi, Tchoe, Ha Jin, Lee, Sung Yeon, Son, Kyeong Min, Kim, Min-Jeong, Jung, Young Ok, Kim, Hyun Ah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Association of Internal Medicine 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5432786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27253239
http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2015.135
_version_ 1783236710810779648
author Choi, Miyoung
Hyun, Min Kyung
Choi, Seongmi
Tchoe, Ha Jin
Lee, Sung Yeon
Son, Kyeong Min
Kim, Min-Jeong
Jung, Young Ok
Kim, Hyun Ah
author_facet Choi, Miyoung
Hyun, Min Kyung
Choi, Seongmi
Tchoe, Ha Jin
Lee, Sung Yeon
Son, Kyeong Min
Kim, Min-Jeong
Jung, Young Ok
Kim, Hyun Ah
author_sort Choi, Miyoung
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: Biological agents (biologics) targeting proinflammatory signaling have emerged as an important treatment option in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Despite the clinical effectiveness of biologics for patients with RA who do not respond to ‘traditional’ disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), there are concerns regarding their cost and long-term safety. In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy of various biologics and traditional DMARDs in RA patients refractory to methotrexate (MTX). METHODS: Four DMARDs (hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine, MTX, lef lunomide) and five anti-tumor necrosis factor drugs (adalimumab, etanercept, golimumab, inf liximab, and certolizumab) were selected. A systematic search of published studies was performed from inception through July 2013. Randomized trials of adults with MTX-refractory RA comparing two or more of the selected medications were included. Among 7,938 titles identified, in total, 16 head-to-head trials were selected. Two reviewers independently abstracted the study data and assessed methodological quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias. Comparative efficacy was analyzed using a Bayesian mixed treatment comparison (MTC). RESULTS: In total, 9, 4, and 11 studies were included for the outcome measures of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Disease Activity Score 28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) < 2.6 (remission), and American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 70 response, respectively. The treatments with the highest efficacy for each outcome measure were certolizumab combined with MTX, golimumab combined with MTX, and certolizumab combined with MTX, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Based on MTC analysis, using data from published randomized controlled trials, certolizumab and golimumab combined with MTX showed the highest efficacy in the three outcome measures (HAQ, DAS28-ESR < 2.6, and ACR 70 response) in MTX-refractory RA patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5432786
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Korean Association of Internal Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54327862017-05-17 Comparative efficacy of biological agents in methotrexate-refractory rheumatoid arthritis patients: a Bayesian mixed treatment comparison Choi, Miyoung Hyun, Min Kyung Choi, Seongmi Tchoe, Ha Jin Lee, Sung Yeon Son, Kyeong Min Kim, Min-Jeong Jung, Young Ok Kim, Hyun Ah Korean J Intern Med Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: Biological agents (biologics) targeting proinflammatory signaling have emerged as an important treatment option in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Despite the clinical effectiveness of biologics for patients with RA who do not respond to ‘traditional’ disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), there are concerns regarding their cost and long-term safety. In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy of various biologics and traditional DMARDs in RA patients refractory to methotrexate (MTX). METHODS: Four DMARDs (hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine, MTX, lef lunomide) and five anti-tumor necrosis factor drugs (adalimumab, etanercept, golimumab, inf liximab, and certolizumab) were selected. A systematic search of published studies was performed from inception through July 2013. Randomized trials of adults with MTX-refractory RA comparing two or more of the selected medications were included. Among 7,938 titles identified, in total, 16 head-to-head trials were selected. Two reviewers independently abstracted the study data and assessed methodological quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias. Comparative efficacy was analyzed using a Bayesian mixed treatment comparison (MTC). RESULTS: In total, 9, 4, and 11 studies were included for the outcome measures of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Disease Activity Score 28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) < 2.6 (remission), and American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 70 response, respectively. The treatments with the highest efficacy for each outcome measure were certolizumab combined with MTX, golimumab combined with MTX, and certolizumab combined with MTX, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Based on MTC analysis, using data from published randomized controlled trials, certolizumab and golimumab combined with MTX showed the highest efficacy in the three outcome measures (HAQ, DAS28-ESR < 2.6, and ACR 70 response) in MTX-refractory RA patients. The Korean Association of Internal Medicine 2017-05 2016-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5432786/ /pubmed/27253239 http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2015.135 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Korean Association of Internal Medicine This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Choi, Miyoung
Hyun, Min Kyung
Choi, Seongmi
Tchoe, Ha Jin
Lee, Sung Yeon
Son, Kyeong Min
Kim, Min-Jeong
Jung, Young Ok
Kim, Hyun Ah
Comparative efficacy of biological agents in methotrexate-refractory rheumatoid arthritis patients: a Bayesian mixed treatment comparison
title Comparative efficacy of biological agents in methotrexate-refractory rheumatoid arthritis patients: a Bayesian mixed treatment comparison
title_full Comparative efficacy of biological agents in methotrexate-refractory rheumatoid arthritis patients: a Bayesian mixed treatment comparison
title_fullStr Comparative efficacy of biological agents in methotrexate-refractory rheumatoid arthritis patients: a Bayesian mixed treatment comparison
title_full_unstemmed Comparative efficacy of biological agents in methotrexate-refractory rheumatoid arthritis patients: a Bayesian mixed treatment comparison
title_short Comparative efficacy of biological agents in methotrexate-refractory rheumatoid arthritis patients: a Bayesian mixed treatment comparison
title_sort comparative efficacy of biological agents in methotrexate-refractory rheumatoid arthritis patients: a bayesian mixed treatment comparison
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5432786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27253239
http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2015.135
work_keys_str_mv AT choimiyoung comparativeefficacyofbiologicalagentsinmethotrexaterefractoryrheumatoidarthritispatientsabayesianmixedtreatmentcomparison
AT hyunminkyung comparativeefficacyofbiologicalagentsinmethotrexaterefractoryrheumatoidarthritispatientsabayesianmixedtreatmentcomparison
AT choiseongmi comparativeefficacyofbiologicalagentsinmethotrexaterefractoryrheumatoidarthritispatientsabayesianmixedtreatmentcomparison
AT tchoehajin comparativeefficacyofbiologicalagentsinmethotrexaterefractoryrheumatoidarthritispatientsabayesianmixedtreatmentcomparison
AT leesungyeon comparativeefficacyofbiologicalagentsinmethotrexaterefractoryrheumatoidarthritispatientsabayesianmixedtreatmentcomparison
AT sonkyeongmin comparativeefficacyofbiologicalagentsinmethotrexaterefractoryrheumatoidarthritispatientsabayesianmixedtreatmentcomparison
AT kimminjeong comparativeefficacyofbiologicalagentsinmethotrexaterefractoryrheumatoidarthritispatientsabayesianmixedtreatmentcomparison
AT jungyoungok comparativeefficacyofbiologicalagentsinmethotrexaterefractoryrheumatoidarthritispatientsabayesianmixedtreatmentcomparison
AT kimhyunah comparativeefficacyofbiologicalagentsinmethotrexaterefractoryrheumatoidarthritispatientsabayesianmixedtreatmentcomparison