Cargando…
Comparative efficacy of biological agents in methotrexate-refractory rheumatoid arthritis patients: a Bayesian mixed treatment comparison
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Biological agents (biologics) targeting proinflammatory signaling have emerged as an important treatment option in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Despite the clinical effectiveness of biologics for patients with RA who do not respond to ‘traditional’ disease-modifying anti-rheumatic dru...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Association of Internal Medicine
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5432786/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27253239 http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2015.135 |
_version_ | 1783236710810779648 |
---|---|
author | Choi, Miyoung Hyun, Min Kyung Choi, Seongmi Tchoe, Ha Jin Lee, Sung Yeon Son, Kyeong Min Kim, Min-Jeong Jung, Young Ok Kim, Hyun Ah |
author_facet | Choi, Miyoung Hyun, Min Kyung Choi, Seongmi Tchoe, Ha Jin Lee, Sung Yeon Son, Kyeong Min Kim, Min-Jeong Jung, Young Ok Kim, Hyun Ah |
author_sort | Choi, Miyoung |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIMS: Biological agents (biologics) targeting proinflammatory signaling have emerged as an important treatment option in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Despite the clinical effectiveness of biologics for patients with RA who do not respond to ‘traditional’ disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), there are concerns regarding their cost and long-term safety. In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy of various biologics and traditional DMARDs in RA patients refractory to methotrexate (MTX). METHODS: Four DMARDs (hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine, MTX, lef lunomide) and five anti-tumor necrosis factor drugs (adalimumab, etanercept, golimumab, inf liximab, and certolizumab) were selected. A systematic search of published studies was performed from inception through July 2013. Randomized trials of adults with MTX-refractory RA comparing two or more of the selected medications were included. Among 7,938 titles identified, in total, 16 head-to-head trials were selected. Two reviewers independently abstracted the study data and assessed methodological quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias. Comparative efficacy was analyzed using a Bayesian mixed treatment comparison (MTC). RESULTS: In total, 9, 4, and 11 studies were included for the outcome measures of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Disease Activity Score 28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) < 2.6 (remission), and American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 70 response, respectively. The treatments with the highest efficacy for each outcome measure were certolizumab combined with MTX, golimumab combined with MTX, and certolizumab combined with MTX, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Based on MTC analysis, using data from published randomized controlled trials, certolizumab and golimumab combined with MTX showed the highest efficacy in the three outcome measures (HAQ, DAS28-ESR < 2.6, and ACR 70 response) in MTX-refractory RA patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5432786 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | The Korean Association of Internal Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54327862017-05-17 Comparative efficacy of biological agents in methotrexate-refractory rheumatoid arthritis patients: a Bayesian mixed treatment comparison Choi, Miyoung Hyun, Min Kyung Choi, Seongmi Tchoe, Ha Jin Lee, Sung Yeon Son, Kyeong Min Kim, Min-Jeong Jung, Young Ok Kim, Hyun Ah Korean J Intern Med Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: Biological agents (biologics) targeting proinflammatory signaling have emerged as an important treatment option in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Despite the clinical effectiveness of biologics for patients with RA who do not respond to ‘traditional’ disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), there are concerns regarding their cost and long-term safety. In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy of various biologics and traditional DMARDs in RA patients refractory to methotrexate (MTX). METHODS: Four DMARDs (hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine, MTX, lef lunomide) and five anti-tumor necrosis factor drugs (adalimumab, etanercept, golimumab, inf liximab, and certolizumab) were selected. A systematic search of published studies was performed from inception through July 2013. Randomized trials of adults with MTX-refractory RA comparing two or more of the selected medications were included. Among 7,938 titles identified, in total, 16 head-to-head trials were selected. Two reviewers independently abstracted the study data and assessed methodological quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias. Comparative efficacy was analyzed using a Bayesian mixed treatment comparison (MTC). RESULTS: In total, 9, 4, and 11 studies were included for the outcome measures of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Disease Activity Score 28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) < 2.6 (remission), and American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 70 response, respectively. The treatments with the highest efficacy for each outcome measure were certolizumab combined with MTX, golimumab combined with MTX, and certolizumab combined with MTX, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Based on MTC analysis, using data from published randomized controlled trials, certolizumab and golimumab combined with MTX showed the highest efficacy in the three outcome measures (HAQ, DAS28-ESR < 2.6, and ACR 70 response) in MTX-refractory RA patients. The Korean Association of Internal Medicine 2017-05 2016-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5432786/ /pubmed/27253239 http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2015.135 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Korean Association of Internal Medicine This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Choi, Miyoung Hyun, Min Kyung Choi, Seongmi Tchoe, Ha Jin Lee, Sung Yeon Son, Kyeong Min Kim, Min-Jeong Jung, Young Ok Kim, Hyun Ah Comparative efficacy of biological agents in methotrexate-refractory rheumatoid arthritis patients: a Bayesian mixed treatment comparison |
title | Comparative efficacy of biological agents in methotrexate-refractory rheumatoid arthritis patients: a Bayesian mixed treatment comparison |
title_full | Comparative efficacy of biological agents in methotrexate-refractory rheumatoid arthritis patients: a Bayesian mixed treatment comparison |
title_fullStr | Comparative efficacy of biological agents in methotrexate-refractory rheumatoid arthritis patients: a Bayesian mixed treatment comparison |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative efficacy of biological agents in methotrexate-refractory rheumatoid arthritis patients: a Bayesian mixed treatment comparison |
title_short | Comparative efficacy of biological agents in methotrexate-refractory rheumatoid arthritis patients: a Bayesian mixed treatment comparison |
title_sort | comparative efficacy of biological agents in methotrexate-refractory rheumatoid arthritis patients: a bayesian mixed treatment comparison |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5432786/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27253239 http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2015.135 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT choimiyoung comparativeefficacyofbiologicalagentsinmethotrexaterefractoryrheumatoidarthritispatientsabayesianmixedtreatmentcomparison AT hyunminkyung comparativeefficacyofbiologicalagentsinmethotrexaterefractoryrheumatoidarthritispatientsabayesianmixedtreatmentcomparison AT choiseongmi comparativeefficacyofbiologicalagentsinmethotrexaterefractoryrheumatoidarthritispatientsabayesianmixedtreatmentcomparison AT tchoehajin comparativeefficacyofbiologicalagentsinmethotrexaterefractoryrheumatoidarthritispatientsabayesianmixedtreatmentcomparison AT leesungyeon comparativeefficacyofbiologicalagentsinmethotrexaterefractoryrheumatoidarthritispatientsabayesianmixedtreatmentcomparison AT sonkyeongmin comparativeefficacyofbiologicalagentsinmethotrexaterefractoryrheumatoidarthritispatientsabayesianmixedtreatmentcomparison AT kimminjeong comparativeefficacyofbiologicalagentsinmethotrexaterefractoryrheumatoidarthritispatientsabayesianmixedtreatmentcomparison AT jungyoungok comparativeefficacyofbiologicalagentsinmethotrexaterefractoryrheumatoidarthritispatientsabayesianmixedtreatmentcomparison AT kimhyunah comparativeefficacyofbiologicalagentsinmethotrexaterefractoryrheumatoidarthritispatientsabayesianmixedtreatmentcomparison |