Cargando…

Evaluation of dosing strategy for pembrolizumab for oncology indications

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, most monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been dosed based on body weight because of perceived contribution of body size in pharmacokinetic variability. The same approach was used in the initial pembrolizumab studies; however, following availability of PK data, the need for w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Freshwater, Tomoko, Kondic, Anna, Ahamadi, Malidi, Li, Claire H., de Greef, Rik, de Alwis, Dinesh, Stone, Julie A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5433037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28515943
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40425-017-0242-5
_version_ 1783236764784132096
author Freshwater, Tomoko
Kondic, Anna
Ahamadi, Malidi
Li, Claire H.
de Greef, Rik
de Alwis, Dinesh
Stone, Julie A.
author_facet Freshwater, Tomoko
Kondic, Anna
Ahamadi, Malidi
Li, Claire H.
de Greef, Rik
de Alwis, Dinesh
Stone, Julie A.
author_sort Freshwater, Tomoko
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Traditionally, most monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been dosed based on body weight because of perceived contribution of body size in pharmacokinetic variability. The same approach was used in the initial pembrolizumab studies; however, following availability of PK data, the need for weight-based dosing for pembrolizumab was reassessed. METHODS: A previously established population PK (popPK) model as well as exposure-response results from patients with advanced melanoma or non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were used to evaluate the potential application of a fixed dosing regimen with the aim of maintaining pembrolizumab exposures within the range demonstrated to provide near maximal efficacy and acceptable safety. Individual PK exposures for the selected fixed dosing regimen from recently completed trials with head and neck cancer, NSCLC, microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) in colorectal cancer (CRC) and urothelial cancer were used to confirm acceptability. To determine whether fixed dosing would maintain exposures within the range of clinical experience, the individual AUC distributions with fixed dosing were compared with the range of exposures from the pembrolizumab doses that were evaluated in early studies (2 mg/kg Q3W, 10 mg/kg Q3W/Q2W). RESULTS: Body-weight dependence of clearance was characterized by a power relationship with an exponent of 0.578, a value consistent with fixed- and weight-based dosing providing similar control of PK variability. A fixed dose of 200 mg Q3W was investigated in trials based on predicted exposures maintained within the established exposure range in all patients. Mean (% CV, n) AUC(ss, 6-weeks) was 1.87 (37%, 830), 1.38 (38%, 760) and 7.63 (35%, 1405) mg*day/mL in patients receiving 200 mg, 2 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg Q3W pembrolizumab. High-weight patients had the lowest exposures with 200 mg Q3W; however, exposures in this group (>90 kg) were within the range of prior clinical experience at 2 mg/kg Q3W associated with near maximal efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Doses of 200 mg and 2 mg/kg provide similar exposure distributions with no advantage to either dosing approach with respect to controlling PK variability. These findings suggest that weight-based and fixed-dose regimens are appropriate for pembrolizumab. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40425-017-0242-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5433037
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54330372017-05-17 Evaluation of dosing strategy for pembrolizumab for oncology indications Freshwater, Tomoko Kondic, Anna Ahamadi, Malidi Li, Claire H. de Greef, Rik de Alwis, Dinesh Stone, Julie A. J Immunother Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Traditionally, most monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been dosed based on body weight because of perceived contribution of body size in pharmacokinetic variability. The same approach was used in the initial pembrolizumab studies; however, following availability of PK data, the need for weight-based dosing for pembrolizumab was reassessed. METHODS: A previously established population PK (popPK) model as well as exposure-response results from patients with advanced melanoma or non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were used to evaluate the potential application of a fixed dosing regimen with the aim of maintaining pembrolizumab exposures within the range demonstrated to provide near maximal efficacy and acceptable safety. Individual PK exposures for the selected fixed dosing regimen from recently completed trials with head and neck cancer, NSCLC, microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) in colorectal cancer (CRC) and urothelial cancer were used to confirm acceptability. To determine whether fixed dosing would maintain exposures within the range of clinical experience, the individual AUC distributions with fixed dosing were compared with the range of exposures from the pembrolizumab doses that were evaluated in early studies (2 mg/kg Q3W, 10 mg/kg Q3W/Q2W). RESULTS: Body-weight dependence of clearance was characterized by a power relationship with an exponent of 0.578, a value consistent with fixed- and weight-based dosing providing similar control of PK variability. A fixed dose of 200 mg Q3W was investigated in trials based on predicted exposures maintained within the established exposure range in all patients. Mean (% CV, n) AUC(ss, 6-weeks) was 1.87 (37%, 830), 1.38 (38%, 760) and 7.63 (35%, 1405) mg*day/mL in patients receiving 200 mg, 2 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg Q3W pembrolizumab. High-weight patients had the lowest exposures with 200 mg Q3W; however, exposures in this group (>90 kg) were within the range of prior clinical experience at 2 mg/kg Q3W associated with near maximal efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Doses of 200 mg and 2 mg/kg provide similar exposure distributions with no advantage to either dosing approach with respect to controlling PK variability. These findings suggest that weight-based and fixed-dose regimens are appropriate for pembrolizumab. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40425-017-0242-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5433037/ /pubmed/28515943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40425-017-0242-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Freshwater, Tomoko
Kondic, Anna
Ahamadi, Malidi
Li, Claire H.
de Greef, Rik
de Alwis, Dinesh
Stone, Julie A.
Evaluation of dosing strategy for pembrolizumab for oncology indications
title Evaluation of dosing strategy for pembrolizumab for oncology indications
title_full Evaluation of dosing strategy for pembrolizumab for oncology indications
title_fullStr Evaluation of dosing strategy for pembrolizumab for oncology indications
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of dosing strategy for pembrolizumab for oncology indications
title_short Evaluation of dosing strategy for pembrolizumab for oncology indications
title_sort evaluation of dosing strategy for pembrolizumab for oncology indications
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5433037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28515943
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40425-017-0242-5
work_keys_str_mv AT freshwatertomoko evaluationofdosingstrategyforpembrolizumabforoncologyindications
AT kondicanna evaluationofdosingstrategyforpembrolizumabforoncologyindications
AT ahamadimalidi evaluationofdosingstrategyforpembrolizumabforoncologyindications
AT liclaireh evaluationofdosingstrategyforpembrolizumabforoncologyindications
AT degreefrik evaluationofdosingstrategyforpembrolizumabforoncologyindications
AT dealwisdinesh evaluationofdosingstrategyforpembrolizumabforoncologyindications
AT stonejuliea evaluationofdosingstrategyforpembrolizumabforoncologyindications