Cargando…
Performance of the dipstick screening test as a predictor of negative urine culture
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the urine dipstick screening test can be used to predict urine culture results. METHODS: A retrospective study conducted between January and December 2014 based on data from 8,587 patients with a medical order for urine dipstick test, urine sediment analysis and uri...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5433304/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28444086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1679-45082017AO3936 |
_version_ | 1783236825174769664 |
---|---|
author | Marques, Alexandre Gimenes Doi, André Mario Pasternak, Jacyr Damascena, Márcio dos Santos França, Carolina Nunes Martino, Marinês Dalla Valle |
author_facet | Marques, Alexandre Gimenes Doi, André Mario Pasternak, Jacyr Damascena, Márcio dos Santos França, Carolina Nunes Martino, Marinês Dalla Valle |
author_sort | Marques, Alexandre Gimenes |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the urine dipstick screening test can be used to predict urine culture results. METHODS: A retrospective study conducted between January and December 2014 based on data from 8,587 patients with a medical order for urine dipstick test, urine sediment analysis and urine culture. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were determined and ROC curve analysis was performed. RESULTS: The percentage of positive cultures was 17.5%. Nitrite had 28% sensitivity and 99% specificity, with positive and negative predictive values of 89% and 87%, respectively. Leukocyte esterase had 79% sensitivity and 84% specificity, with positive and negative predictive values of 51% and 95%, respectively. The combination of positive nitrite or positive leukocyte esterase tests had 85% sensitivity and 84% specificity, with positive and negative predictive values of 53% and 96%, respectively. Positive urinary sediment (more than ten leukocytes per microliter) had 92% sensitivity and 71% specificity, with positive and negative predictive values of 40% and 98%, respectively. The combination of nitrite positive test and positive urinary sediment had 82% sensitivity and 99% specificity, with positive and negative predictive values of 91% and 98%, respectively. The combination of nitrite or leukocyte esterase positive tests and positive urinary sediment had the highest sensitivity (94%) and specificity (84%), with positive and negative predictive values of 58% and 99%, respectively. Based on ROC curve analysis, the best indicator of positive urine culture was the combination of positives leukocyte esterase or nitrite tests and positive urinary sediment, followed by positives leukocyte and nitrite tests, positive urinary sediment alone, positive leukocyte esterase test alone, positive nitrite test alone and finally association of positives nitrite and urinary sediment (AUC: 0.845, 0.844, 0.817, 0.814, 0.635 and 0.626, respectively). CONCLUSION: A negative urine culture can be predicted by negative dipstick test results. Therefore, this test may be a reliable predictor of negative urine culture. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5433304 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54333042017-05-30 Performance of the dipstick screening test as a predictor of negative urine culture Marques, Alexandre Gimenes Doi, André Mario Pasternak, Jacyr Damascena, Márcio dos Santos França, Carolina Nunes Martino, Marinês Dalla Valle Einstein (Sao Paulo) Original Article OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the urine dipstick screening test can be used to predict urine culture results. METHODS: A retrospective study conducted between January and December 2014 based on data from 8,587 patients with a medical order for urine dipstick test, urine sediment analysis and urine culture. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were determined and ROC curve analysis was performed. RESULTS: The percentage of positive cultures was 17.5%. Nitrite had 28% sensitivity and 99% specificity, with positive and negative predictive values of 89% and 87%, respectively. Leukocyte esterase had 79% sensitivity and 84% specificity, with positive and negative predictive values of 51% and 95%, respectively. The combination of positive nitrite or positive leukocyte esterase tests had 85% sensitivity and 84% specificity, with positive and negative predictive values of 53% and 96%, respectively. Positive urinary sediment (more than ten leukocytes per microliter) had 92% sensitivity and 71% specificity, with positive and negative predictive values of 40% and 98%, respectively. The combination of nitrite positive test and positive urinary sediment had 82% sensitivity and 99% specificity, with positive and negative predictive values of 91% and 98%, respectively. The combination of nitrite or leukocyte esterase positive tests and positive urinary sediment had the highest sensitivity (94%) and specificity (84%), with positive and negative predictive values of 58% and 99%, respectively. Based on ROC curve analysis, the best indicator of positive urine culture was the combination of positives leukocyte esterase or nitrite tests and positive urinary sediment, followed by positives leukocyte and nitrite tests, positive urinary sediment alone, positive leukocyte esterase test alone, positive nitrite test alone and finally association of positives nitrite and urinary sediment (AUC: 0.845, 0.844, 0.817, 0.814, 0.635 and 0.626, respectively). CONCLUSION: A negative urine culture can be predicted by negative dipstick test results. Therefore, this test may be a reliable predictor of negative urine culture. Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5433304/ /pubmed/28444086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1679-45082017AO3936 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Marques, Alexandre Gimenes Doi, André Mario Pasternak, Jacyr Damascena, Márcio dos Santos França, Carolina Nunes Martino, Marinês Dalla Valle Performance of the dipstick screening test as a predictor of negative urine culture |
title | Performance of the dipstick screening test as a predictor of negative urine culture |
title_full | Performance of the dipstick screening test as a predictor of negative urine culture |
title_fullStr | Performance of the dipstick screening test as a predictor of negative urine culture |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance of the dipstick screening test as a predictor of negative urine culture |
title_short | Performance of the dipstick screening test as a predictor of negative urine culture |
title_sort | performance of the dipstick screening test as a predictor of negative urine culture |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5433304/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28444086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1679-45082017AO3936 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marquesalexandregimenes performanceofthedipstickscreeningtestasapredictorofnegativeurineculture AT doiandremario performanceofthedipstickscreeningtestasapredictorofnegativeurineculture AT pasternakjacyr performanceofthedipstickscreeningtestasapredictorofnegativeurineculture AT damascenamarciodossantos performanceofthedipstickscreeningtestasapredictorofnegativeurineculture AT francacarolinanunes performanceofthedipstickscreeningtestasapredictorofnegativeurineculture AT martinomarinesdallavalle performanceofthedipstickscreeningtestasapredictorofnegativeurineculture |