Cargando…

Urethral pressure variation: a neglected contributing factor in patients with overactive bladder syndrome?

OBJECTIVE: To study urethral pressure variations during the whole filling phase among different groups of patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We investigated 79 consecutive patients from January 2011 to June 2012. All patients were recruited within our routine practice in our continence clinic and were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kirschner-Hermanns, Ruth, Anding, Ralf, Gadzhiev, Nariman, Goping, Ing, Campbell, Adele, Huppertz, Nadine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5433367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27819757
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0308
_version_ 1783236838067011584
author Kirschner-Hermanns, Ruth
Anding, Ralf
Gadzhiev, Nariman
Goping, Ing
Campbell, Adele
Huppertz, Nadine
author_facet Kirschner-Hermanns, Ruth
Anding, Ralf
Gadzhiev, Nariman
Goping, Ing
Campbell, Adele
Huppertz, Nadine
author_sort Kirschner-Hermanns, Ruth
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To study urethral pressure variations during the whole filling phase among different groups of patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We investigated 79 consecutive patients from January 2011 to June 2012. All patients were recruited within our routine practice in our continence clinic and were evaluated with urodynamic exam according to the standards of the International Continence Society (ICS) with an additional continuous measurement of the urethral pressure profile (cUPP) that was done in a supine position. Patients with genital prolapse >grade I, as well as patients with impaired cognitive function or neurogenic disorders were excluded. Bacteriuria at the time of investigation was excluded by urine analysis. Urethral pressure changes higher than 15cmH(2)O were considered as ‘urethral instability’. RESULTS: From 79 investigated patients, 29 were clinically diagnosed with OAB syndrome, 19 with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and 31 with mixed (OAB and SUI) incontinence. The prevalence of ‘urethral instability’ as defined in this study was 54.4% (43/79). The mean Δp in patients with OAB (36.5cmH2O) was significantly higher (p<0.05) than in groups with pure stress (14.9cmH2O) and mixed urinary incontinence (19.3cmH2O). CONCLUSIONS: Etiology of ‘urethral instability’ is unknown, but high prevalence among patients with overactive bladder syndrome, especially concomitant with detrusor activity can raise a fair question and direct further diagnostic as well as treatment efforts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5433367
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54333672017-05-30 Urethral pressure variation: a neglected contributing factor in patients with overactive bladder syndrome? Kirschner-Hermanns, Ruth Anding, Ralf Gadzhiev, Nariman Goping, Ing Campbell, Adele Huppertz, Nadine Int Braz J Urol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To study urethral pressure variations during the whole filling phase among different groups of patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We investigated 79 consecutive patients from January 2011 to June 2012. All patients were recruited within our routine practice in our continence clinic and were evaluated with urodynamic exam according to the standards of the International Continence Society (ICS) with an additional continuous measurement of the urethral pressure profile (cUPP) that was done in a supine position. Patients with genital prolapse >grade I, as well as patients with impaired cognitive function or neurogenic disorders were excluded. Bacteriuria at the time of investigation was excluded by urine analysis. Urethral pressure changes higher than 15cmH(2)O were considered as ‘urethral instability’. RESULTS: From 79 investigated patients, 29 were clinically diagnosed with OAB syndrome, 19 with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and 31 with mixed (OAB and SUI) incontinence. The prevalence of ‘urethral instability’ as defined in this study was 54.4% (43/79). The mean Δp in patients with OAB (36.5cmH2O) was significantly higher (p<0.05) than in groups with pure stress (14.9cmH2O) and mixed urinary incontinence (19.3cmH2O). CONCLUSIONS: Etiology of ‘urethral instability’ is unknown, but high prevalence among patients with overactive bladder syndrome, especially concomitant with detrusor activity can raise a fair question and direct further diagnostic as well as treatment efforts. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5433367/ /pubmed/27819757 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0308 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kirschner-Hermanns, Ruth
Anding, Ralf
Gadzhiev, Nariman
Goping, Ing
Campbell, Adele
Huppertz, Nadine
Urethral pressure variation: a neglected contributing factor in patients with overactive bladder syndrome?
title Urethral pressure variation: a neglected contributing factor in patients with overactive bladder syndrome?
title_full Urethral pressure variation: a neglected contributing factor in patients with overactive bladder syndrome?
title_fullStr Urethral pressure variation: a neglected contributing factor in patients with overactive bladder syndrome?
title_full_unstemmed Urethral pressure variation: a neglected contributing factor in patients with overactive bladder syndrome?
title_short Urethral pressure variation: a neglected contributing factor in patients with overactive bladder syndrome?
title_sort urethral pressure variation: a neglected contributing factor in patients with overactive bladder syndrome?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5433367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27819757
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0308
work_keys_str_mv AT kirschnerhermannsruth urethralpressurevariationaneglectedcontributingfactorinpatientswithoveractivebladdersyndrome
AT andingralf urethralpressurevariationaneglectedcontributingfactorinpatientswithoveractivebladdersyndrome
AT gadzhievnariman urethralpressurevariationaneglectedcontributingfactorinpatientswithoveractivebladdersyndrome
AT gopinging urethralpressurevariationaneglectedcontributingfactorinpatientswithoveractivebladdersyndrome
AT campbelladele urethralpressurevariationaneglectedcontributingfactorinpatientswithoveractivebladdersyndrome
AT huppertznadine urethralpressurevariationaneglectedcontributingfactorinpatientswithoveractivebladdersyndrome