Cargando…

Accuracy and precision of smartphone applications and commercially available motion sensors in multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND: There is increased interest in the application of smartphone applications and wearable motion sensors among multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the accuracy and precision of common smartphone applications and motion sensors for measuring steps taken by MS pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Balto, Julia M, Kinnett-Hopkins, Dominique L, Motl, Robert W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5433404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28607720
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055217316634754
_version_ 1783236846987247616
author Balto, Julia M
Kinnett-Hopkins, Dominique L
Motl, Robert W
author_facet Balto, Julia M
Kinnett-Hopkins, Dominique L
Motl, Robert W
author_sort Balto, Julia M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is increased interest in the application of smartphone applications and wearable motion sensors among multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the accuracy and precision of common smartphone applications and motion sensors for measuring steps taken by MS patients while walking on a treadmill. METHODS: Forty-five MS patients (Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) = 1.0–5.0) underwent two 500-step walking trials at comfortable walking speed on a treadmill. Participants wore five motion sensors: the Digi-Walker SW-200 pedometer (Yamax), the UP2 and UP Move (Jawbone), and the Flex and One (Fitbit). The smartphone applications were Health (Apple), Health Mate (Withings), and Moves (ProtoGeo Oy). RESULTS: The Fitbit One had the best absolute (mean = 490.6 steps, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 485.6–495.5 steps) and relative accuracy (1.9% error), and absolute (SD = 16.4) and relative precision (coefficient of variation (CV) = 0.0), for the first 500-step walking trial; this was repeated with the second trial. Relative accuracy was correlated with slower walking speed for the first (r(s) = −.53) and second (r(s) = −.53) trials. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the waist-worn Fitbit One is the most precise and accurate sensor for measuring steps when walking on a treadmill, but future research is needed (testing the device across a broader range of disability, at different speeds, and in real-life walking conditions) before inclusion in clinical research and practice with MS patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5433404
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54334042017-06-12 Accuracy and precision of smartphone applications and commercially available motion sensors in multiple sclerosis Balto, Julia M Kinnett-Hopkins, Dominique L Motl, Robert W Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin Original Article BACKGROUND: There is increased interest in the application of smartphone applications and wearable motion sensors among multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the accuracy and precision of common smartphone applications and motion sensors for measuring steps taken by MS patients while walking on a treadmill. METHODS: Forty-five MS patients (Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) = 1.0–5.0) underwent two 500-step walking trials at comfortable walking speed on a treadmill. Participants wore five motion sensors: the Digi-Walker SW-200 pedometer (Yamax), the UP2 and UP Move (Jawbone), and the Flex and One (Fitbit). The smartphone applications were Health (Apple), Health Mate (Withings), and Moves (ProtoGeo Oy). RESULTS: The Fitbit One had the best absolute (mean = 490.6 steps, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 485.6–495.5 steps) and relative accuracy (1.9% error), and absolute (SD = 16.4) and relative precision (coefficient of variation (CV) = 0.0), for the first 500-step walking trial; this was repeated with the second trial. Relative accuracy was correlated with slower walking speed for the first (r(s) = −.53) and second (r(s) = −.53) trials. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the waist-worn Fitbit One is the most precise and accurate sensor for measuring steps when walking on a treadmill, but future research is needed (testing the device across a broader range of disability, at different speeds, and in real-life walking conditions) before inclusion in clinical research and practice with MS patients. SAGE Publications 2016-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5433404/ /pubmed/28607720 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055217316634754 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page(https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Balto, Julia M
Kinnett-Hopkins, Dominique L
Motl, Robert W
Accuracy and precision of smartphone applications and commercially available motion sensors in multiple sclerosis
title Accuracy and precision of smartphone applications and commercially available motion sensors in multiple sclerosis
title_full Accuracy and precision of smartphone applications and commercially available motion sensors in multiple sclerosis
title_fullStr Accuracy and precision of smartphone applications and commercially available motion sensors in multiple sclerosis
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy and precision of smartphone applications and commercially available motion sensors in multiple sclerosis
title_short Accuracy and precision of smartphone applications and commercially available motion sensors in multiple sclerosis
title_sort accuracy and precision of smartphone applications and commercially available motion sensors in multiple sclerosis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5433404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28607720
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055217316634754
work_keys_str_mv AT baltojuliam accuracyandprecisionofsmartphoneapplicationsandcommerciallyavailablemotionsensorsinmultiplesclerosis
AT kinnetthopkinsdominiquel accuracyandprecisionofsmartphoneapplicationsandcommerciallyavailablemotionsensorsinmultiplesclerosis
AT motlrobertw accuracyandprecisionofsmartphoneapplicationsandcommerciallyavailablemotionsensorsinmultiplesclerosis