Cargando…

The value of laboratory tests in the diagnosis of tuberculosis

BACKGROUND AND AIM: In the last decades, the inhabitants of the Romanian region known as Jiu Valley underwent changes in their social and economic status which determined changes in behaviour and health, which influenced their general health condition. One of the consequences was the exacerbation of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: PETRE, NICOLAE, POP, CARMEN MONICA, HOMORODEAN, DANIELA
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5433571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28559703
http://dx.doi.org/10.15386/cjmed-650
_version_ 1783236882387173376
author PETRE, NICOLAE
POP, CARMEN MONICA
HOMORODEAN, DANIELA
author_facet PETRE, NICOLAE
POP, CARMEN MONICA
HOMORODEAN, DANIELA
author_sort PETRE, NICOLAE
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIM: In the last decades, the inhabitants of the Romanian region known as Jiu Valley underwent changes in their social and economic status which determined changes in behaviour and health, which influenced their general health condition. One of the consequences was the exacerbation of tuberculosis. In order to control this situation, there was a need to increase the efficiency of diagnosis. This optimization can be reached by a better detection of mycobacterium infection, optimal isolation of strains and identification of the resistance of strains to antituberculous drugs. METHODS: In order to identify the best diagnostic modality, we compared the efficacy of the classical bacteriological diagnosis, still performed in the field, to the modern methods of molecular biology. The study included two groups, one represented by 213 patients who were investigated using the classical bacteriological methods, and 49 who were diagnosed using the PCR method. RESULTS: The tuberculosis patients who have been evaluated only with the classical bacteriological methods where diagnosed as TB positive and treated according to the national guidelines, which are in agreement with the international guidelines. The PCR diagnostic methods had a superior diagnostic value compared to the traditional bacteriological method. CONCLUSIONS: The results revealed the superiority of the modern molecular biology methods based on PCR. However the bacteriological method remains useful in areas where PCR cannot be afforded.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5433571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54335712017-05-30 The value of laboratory tests in the diagnosis of tuberculosis PETRE, NICOLAE POP, CARMEN MONICA HOMORODEAN, DANIELA Clujul Med Original Research BACKGROUND AND AIM: In the last decades, the inhabitants of the Romanian region known as Jiu Valley underwent changes in their social and economic status which determined changes in behaviour and health, which influenced their general health condition. One of the consequences was the exacerbation of tuberculosis. In order to control this situation, there was a need to increase the efficiency of diagnosis. This optimization can be reached by a better detection of mycobacterium infection, optimal isolation of strains and identification of the resistance of strains to antituberculous drugs. METHODS: In order to identify the best diagnostic modality, we compared the efficacy of the classical bacteriological diagnosis, still performed in the field, to the modern methods of molecular biology. The study included two groups, one represented by 213 patients who were investigated using the classical bacteriological methods, and 49 who were diagnosed using the PCR method. RESULTS: The tuberculosis patients who have been evaluated only with the classical bacteriological methods where diagnosed as TB positive and treated according to the national guidelines, which are in agreement with the international guidelines. The PCR diagnostic methods had a superior diagnostic value compared to the traditional bacteriological method. CONCLUSIONS: The results revealed the superiority of the modern molecular biology methods based on PCR. However the bacteriological method remains useful in areas where PCR cannot be afforded. Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy 2017 2017-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5433571/ /pubmed/28559703 http://dx.doi.org/10.15386/cjmed-650 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Original Research
PETRE, NICOLAE
POP, CARMEN MONICA
HOMORODEAN, DANIELA
The value of laboratory tests in the diagnosis of tuberculosis
title The value of laboratory tests in the diagnosis of tuberculosis
title_full The value of laboratory tests in the diagnosis of tuberculosis
title_fullStr The value of laboratory tests in the diagnosis of tuberculosis
title_full_unstemmed The value of laboratory tests in the diagnosis of tuberculosis
title_short The value of laboratory tests in the diagnosis of tuberculosis
title_sort value of laboratory tests in the diagnosis of tuberculosis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5433571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28559703
http://dx.doi.org/10.15386/cjmed-650
work_keys_str_mv AT petrenicolae thevalueoflaboratorytestsinthediagnosisoftuberculosis
AT popcarmenmonica thevalueoflaboratorytestsinthediagnosisoftuberculosis
AT homorodeandaniela thevalueoflaboratorytestsinthediagnosisoftuberculosis
AT petrenicolae valueoflaboratorytestsinthediagnosisoftuberculosis
AT popcarmenmonica valueoflaboratorytestsinthediagnosisoftuberculosis
AT homorodeandaniela valueoflaboratorytestsinthediagnosisoftuberculosis