Cargando…
Flap surgical techniques for incisional hernia recurrences. A swine experimental model
BACKGROUND AND AIM: In the age of synthetic prostheses most of hernia studies include a careful examination of the various types of prosthesis, their characteristics and their repair indications. Biological prostheses are also beginning to draw attention. But in terms of recurrence especially for po...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5433574/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28559706 http://dx.doi.org/10.15386/cjmed-684 |
_version_ | 1783236883127468032 |
---|---|
author | POPA, FLORINA ARDELEAN, FILIP PESTEAN, COSMIN PURDOIU, ROBERT ROSCA, OANA GEORGESCU, ALEXANDRU |
author_facet | POPA, FLORINA ARDELEAN, FILIP PESTEAN, COSMIN PURDOIU, ROBERT ROSCA, OANA GEORGESCU, ALEXANDRU |
author_sort | POPA, FLORINA |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIM: In the age of synthetic prostheses most of hernia studies include a careful examination of the various types of prosthesis, their characteristics and their repair indications. Biological prostheses are also beginning to draw attention. But in terms of recurrence especially for poor or developing countries, the discussion is different, due to their high cost which makes them difficult to afford. In this article we present new flap reconstruction techniques for the reconstruction of the abdominal wall versus mesh repair, applied on swine models, outline the results of each technique, and specify the indications for their use. METHODS: An experimental protocol using four swine models (PIC-FII-337 hybrid breed pigs), five months old, was conducted. All animal care and operative procedures were studied following the protocol approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Medicine and Pharmacy resolution no. 281/2014 of the Department of Surgery of the University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine); the study was carried out between November 2015 and February 2016. The primary objective was to compare the effect of surgical strategies in the treatment of the abdominal wall defect using variable flaps versus mesh repair in a large-animal models. Physical examination and ultrasound imaging of the abdominal wall repair were done on determined periods, during one month. The complications occurring after the abdominal wall repair were edema, collections, superficial dehiscence an recurrences. RESULTS: No recurrences were reported at one month results, all seromas reported were solved over time by natural drainage. Superficial necrosis appeared in two swine models and superficial dehiscence occurred in one model, the perforator ”plus” flap. Mesh infection was detected in the “onlay” swine model. CONCLUSIONS: In terms of recurrences, contaminated abdominal wall defects or other contraindications to the use of prosthetic materials, biological mesh repair or flap surgery are the only surgical options. Based on our findings and considering the high cost reported by the biological meshes use, flap surgery becomes the suitable treatment for such cases, allowing a good reconstruction of the abdominal wall. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5433574 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54335742017-05-30 Flap surgical techniques for incisional hernia recurrences. A swine experimental model POPA, FLORINA ARDELEAN, FILIP PESTEAN, COSMIN PURDOIU, ROBERT ROSCA, OANA GEORGESCU, ALEXANDRU Clujul Med Original Research BACKGROUND AND AIM: In the age of synthetic prostheses most of hernia studies include a careful examination of the various types of prosthesis, their characteristics and their repair indications. Biological prostheses are also beginning to draw attention. But in terms of recurrence especially for poor or developing countries, the discussion is different, due to their high cost which makes them difficult to afford. In this article we present new flap reconstruction techniques for the reconstruction of the abdominal wall versus mesh repair, applied on swine models, outline the results of each technique, and specify the indications for their use. METHODS: An experimental protocol using four swine models (PIC-FII-337 hybrid breed pigs), five months old, was conducted. All animal care and operative procedures were studied following the protocol approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Medicine and Pharmacy resolution no. 281/2014 of the Department of Surgery of the University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine); the study was carried out between November 2015 and February 2016. The primary objective was to compare the effect of surgical strategies in the treatment of the abdominal wall defect using variable flaps versus mesh repair in a large-animal models. Physical examination and ultrasound imaging of the abdominal wall repair were done on determined periods, during one month. The complications occurring after the abdominal wall repair were edema, collections, superficial dehiscence an recurrences. RESULTS: No recurrences were reported at one month results, all seromas reported were solved over time by natural drainage. Superficial necrosis appeared in two swine models and superficial dehiscence occurred in one model, the perforator ”plus” flap. Mesh infection was detected in the “onlay” swine model. CONCLUSIONS: In terms of recurrences, contaminated abdominal wall defects or other contraindications to the use of prosthetic materials, biological mesh repair or flap surgery are the only surgical options. Based on our findings and considering the high cost reported by the biological meshes use, flap surgery becomes the suitable treatment for such cases, allowing a good reconstruction of the abdominal wall. Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy 2017 2017-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5433574/ /pubmed/28559706 http://dx.doi.org/10.15386/cjmed-684 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License |
spellingShingle | Original Research POPA, FLORINA ARDELEAN, FILIP PESTEAN, COSMIN PURDOIU, ROBERT ROSCA, OANA GEORGESCU, ALEXANDRU Flap surgical techniques for incisional hernia recurrences. A swine experimental model |
title | Flap surgical techniques for incisional hernia recurrences. A swine experimental model |
title_full | Flap surgical techniques for incisional hernia recurrences. A swine experimental model |
title_fullStr | Flap surgical techniques for incisional hernia recurrences. A swine experimental model |
title_full_unstemmed | Flap surgical techniques for incisional hernia recurrences. A swine experimental model |
title_short | Flap surgical techniques for incisional hernia recurrences. A swine experimental model |
title_sort | flap surgical techniques for incisional hernia recurrences. a swine experimental model |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5433574/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28559706 http://dx.doi.org/10.15386/cjmed-684 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT popaflorina flapsurgicaltechniquesforincisionalherniarecurrencesaswineexperimentalmodel AT ardeleanfilip flapsurgicaltechniquesforincisionalherniarecurrencesaswineexperimentalmodel AT pesteancosmin flapsurgicaltechniquesforincisionalherniarecurrencesaswineexperimentalmodel AT purdoiurobert flapsurgicaltechniquesforincisionalherniarecurrencesaswineexperimentalmodel AT roscaoana flapsurgicaltechniquesforincisionalherniarecurrencesaswineexperimentalmodel AT georgescualexandru flapsurgicaltechniquesforincisionalherniarecurrencesaswineexperimentalmodel |