Cargando…

The comparison of printed resources bacterial contamination in libraries of Al-Zahra Hospital and Sciences Faculty of Isfahan University and the determination of their antibiotic sensitivity pattern

INTRODUCTION: During the library loan process, the printed resources can be a carrier of pathogenic bacteria. In this study, it was tried to compare the Bacterial Contamination Rates and their antibiotic sensitivity pattern in printed resources of a hospital and a non-hospital library. METHODS: This...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rafiei, Hosein, Chadeganipour, Mostafa, Ojaghi, Rezvan, Maracy, Mohammad Reza, Nouri, Rasool
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5433642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28546984
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2277-9531.204744
_version_ 1783236889510150144
author Rafiei, Hosein
Chadeganipour, Mostafa
Ojaghi, Rezvan
Maracy, Mohammad Reza
Nouri, Rasool
author_facet Rafiei, Hosein
Chadeganipour, Mostafa
Ojaghi, Rezvan
Maracy, Mohammad Reza
Nouri, Rasool
author_sort Rafiei, Hosein
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: During the library loan process, the printed resources can be a carrier of pathogenic bacteria. In this study, it was tried to compare the Bacterial Contamination Rates and their antibiotic sensitivity pattern in printed resources of a hospital and a non-hospital library. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study. Returning books from the Al-Zahra hospital library and library of Sciences faculty of Isfahan University provides the research community. The sample size, 96 cases, was calculated using quota sampling. For sampling sterile swab dipped in trypticase soy broth medium and transfer trypticase soy broth medium were used. To identify different type of isolated bacteria from Gram-staining test and biochemical tests such as; TSI, IMViC and etc., were used. RESULTS: 76 (79.2%) and 20 (20.8%) of cultured samples were negative and positive, the respectively. Of 20 positive samples, 11 samples (55%) belong to the family Enterobacteriaceae that after detecting by Differential teste identified all 11 samples of Enterobacter that all of them were sensitive to Gentamicin and Ofloxacin. Also the most resistance to Nitrofurantoin and Amikacin was observed. 9 cases remained (45%) were coagulase-negative Staphylococcus that all of them were sensitive to the Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and Cephalexin antibiotics also the most resistance to Cefixime was observed. CONCLUSION: Considering that the Enterobacter sp and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus were separated from the books, the books as well as other hospital and medical equipment can transmit the infection to librarians, library users, patients and hospital staff, and also it can produce serious infections in patients with immune deficiency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5433642
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54336422017-05-25 The comparison of printed resources bacterial contamination in libraries of Al-Zahra Hospital and Sciences Faculty of Isfahan University and the determination of their antibiotic sensitivity pattern Rafiei, Hosein Chadeganipour, Mostafa Ojaghi, Rezvan Maracy, Mohammad Reza Nouri, Rasool J Educ Health Promot Original Article INTRODUCTION: During the library loan process, the printed resources can be a carrier of pathogenic bacteria. In this study, it was tried to compare the Bacterial Contamination Rates and their antibiotic sensitivity pattern in printed resources of a hospital and a non-hospital library. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study. Returning books from the Al-Zahra hospital library and library of Sciences faculty of Isfahan University provides the research community. The sample size, 96 cases, was calculated using quota sampling. For sampling sterile swab dipped in trypticase soy broth medium and transfer trypticase soy broth medium were used. To identify different type of isolated bacteria from Gram-staining test and biochemical tests such as; TSI, IMViC and etc., were used. RESULTS: 76 (79.2%) and 20 (20.8%) of cultured samples were negative and positive, the respectively. Of 20 positive samples, 11 samples (55%) belong to the family Enterobacteriaceae that after detecting by Differential teste identified all 11 samples of Enterobacter that all of them were sensitive to Gentamicin and Ofloxacin. Also the most resistance to Nitrofurantoin and Amikacin was observed. 9 cases remained (45%) were coagulase-negative Staphylococcus that all of them were sensitive to the Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and Cephalexin antibiotics also the most resistance to Cefixime was observed. CONCLUSION: Considering that the Enterobacter sp and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus were separated from the books, the books as well as other hospital and medical equipment can transmit the infection to librarians, library users, patients and hospital staff, and also it can produce serious infections in patients with immune deficiency. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5433642/ /pubmed/28546984 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2277-9531.204744 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Journal of Education and Health Promotion http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Rafiei, Hosein
Chadeganipour, Mostafa
Ojaghi, Rezvan
Maracy, Mohammad Reza
Nouri, Rasool
The comparison of printed resources bacterial contamination in libraries of Al-Zahra Hospital and Sciences Faculty of Isfahan University and the determination of their antibiotic sensitivity pattern
title The comparison of printed resources bacterial contamination in libraries of Al-Zahra Hospital and Sciences Faculty of Isfahan University and the determination of their antibiotic sensitivity pattern
title_full The comparison of printed resources bacterial contamination in libraries of Al-Zahra Hospital and Sciences Faculty of Isfahan University and the determination of their antibiotic sensitivity pattern
title_fullStr The comparison of printed resources bacterial contamination in libraries of Al-Zahra Hospital and Sciences Faculty of Isfahan University and the determination of their antibiotic sensitivity pattern
title_full_unstemmed The comparison of printed resources bacterial contamination in libraries of Al-Zahra Hospital and Sciences Faculty of Isfahan University and the determination of their antibiotic sensitivity pattern
title_short The comparison of printed resources bacterial contamination in libraries of Al-Zahra Hospital and Sciences Faculty of Isfahan University and the determination of their antibiotic sensitivity pattern
title_sort comparison of printed resources bacterial contamination in libraries of al-zahra hospital and sciences faculty of isfahan university and the determination of their antibiotic sensitivity pattern
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5433642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28546984
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2277-9531.204744
work_keys_str_mv AT rafieihosein thecomparisonofprintedresourcesbacterialcontaminationinlibrariesofalzahrahospitalandsciencesfacultyofisfahanuniversityandthedeterminationoftheirantibioticsensitivitypattern
AT chadeganipourmostafa thecomparisonofprintedresourcesbacterialcontaminationinlibrariesofalzahrahospitalandsciencesfacultyofisfahanuniversityandthedeterminationoftheirantibioticsensitivitypattern
AT ojaghirezvan thecomparisonofprintedresourcesbacterialcontaminationinlibrariesofalzahrahospitalandsciencesfacultyofisfahanuniversityandthedeterminationoftheirantibioticsensitivitypattern
AT maracymohammadreza thecomparisonofprintedresourcesbacterialcontaminationinlibrariesofalzahrahospitalandsciencesfacultyofisfahanuniversityandthedeterminationoftheirantibioticsensitivitypattern
AT nourirasool thecomparisonofprintedresourcesbacterialcontaminationinlibrariesofalzahrahospitalandsciencesfacultyofisfahanuniversityandthedeterminationoftheirantibioticsensitivitypattern
AT rafieihosein comparisonofprintedresourcesbacterialcontaminationinlibrariesofalzahrahospitalandsciencesfacultyofisfahanuniversityandthedeterminationoftheirantibioticsensitivitypattern
AT chadeganipourmostafa comparisonofprintedresourcesbacterialcontaminationinlibrariesofalzahrahospitalandsciencesfacultyofisfahanuniversityandthedeterminationoftheirantibioticsensitivitypattern
AT ojaghirezvan comparisonofprintedresourcesbacterialcontaminationinlibrariesofalzahrahospitalandsciencesfacultyofisfahanuniversityandthedeterminationoftheirantibioticsensitivitypattern
AT maracymohammadreza comparisonofprintedresourcesbacterialcontaminationinlibrariesofalzahrahospitalandsciencesfacultyofisfahanuniversityandthedeterminationoftheirantibioticsensitivitypattern
AT nourirasool comparisonofprintedresourcesbacterialcontaminationinlibrariesofalzahrahospitalandsciencesfacultyofisfahanuniversityandthedeterminationoftheirantibioticsensitivitypattern