Cargando…

The worst case scenario: Locomotor and collision demands of the longest periods of gameplay in professional rugby union

A number of studies have used global positioning systems (GPS) to report on positional differences in the physical game demands of rugby union both on an average and singular bout basis. However, the ability of these studies to report quantitative data is limited by a lack of validation of certain a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reardon, Cillian, Tobin, Daniel P., Tierney, Peter, Delahunt, Eamonn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5433699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28510582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177072
_version_ 1783236903234961408
author Reardon, Cillian
Tobin, Daniel P.
Tierney, Peter
Delahunt, Eamonn
author_facet Reardon, Cillian
Tobin, Daniel P.
Tierney, Peter
Delahunt, Eamonn
author_sort Reardon, Cillian
collection PubMed
description A number of studies have used global positioning systems (GPS) to report on positional differences in the physical game demands of rugby union both on an average and singular bout basis. However, the ability of these studies to report quantitative data is limited by a lack of validation of certain aspects of measurement by GPS micro-technology. Furthermore no study has analyzed the positional physical demands of the longest bouts of ball-in-play time in rugby union. The aim of the present study is to compare the demands of the single longest period of ball-in-play, termed “worst case scenario” (WCS) between positional groups, which have previously been reported to have distinguishable game demands. The results of this study indicate that WCS periods follow a similar sporadic pattern as average demands but are played at a far higher pace than previously reported for average game demands with average meters per minute of 116.8 m. The positional differences in running and collision activity previously reported are perpetuated within WCS periods. Backs covered greater total distances than forwards (318 m vs 289 m), carried out more high-speed running (11.1 m·min(-1) vs 5.5 m·min(-1)) and achieved higher maximum velocities (MaxVel). Outside Backs achieved the highest MaxVel values (6.84 m·sec(-1)). Tight Five and Back Row forwards underwent significantly more collisions than Inside Back and Outside Backs (0.73 & 0.89 collisions·min(-1) vs 0.28 & 0.41 collisions·min(-1) respectively). The results of the present study provide information on the positional physical requirements of performance in prolonged periods involving multiple high intensity bursts of effort. Although the current state of GPS micro-technology as a measurement tool does not permit reporting of collision intensity or acceleration data, the combined use of video and GPS provides valuable information to the practitioner. This can be used to match and replicate game demands in training.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5433699
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54336992017-05-26 The worst case scenario: Locomotor and collision demands of the longest periods of gameplay in professional rugby union Reardon, Cillian Tobin, Daniel P. Tierney, Peter Delahunt, Eamonn PLoS One Research Article A number of studies have used global positioning systems (GPS) to report on positional differences in the physical game demands of rugby union both on an average and singular bout basis. However, the ability of these studies to report quantitative data is limited by a lack of validation of certain aspects of measurement by GPS micro-technology. Furthermore no study has analyzed the positional physical demands of the longest bouts of ball-in-play time in rugby union. The aim of the present study is to compare the demands of the single longest period of ball-in-play, termed “worst case scenario” (WCS) between positional groups, which have previously been reported to have distinguishable game demands. The results of this study indicate that WCS periods follow a similar sporadic pattern as average demands but are played at a far higher pace than previously reported for average game demands with average meters per minute of 116.8 m. The positional differences in running and collision activity previously reported are perpetuated within WCS periods. Backs covered greater total distances than forwards (318 m vs 289 m), carried out more high-speed running (11.1 m·min(-1) vs 5.5 m·min(-1)) and achieved higher maximum velocities (MaxVel). Outside Backs achieved the highest MaxVel values (6.84 m·sec(-1)). Tight Five and Back Row forwards underwent significantly more collisions than Inside Back and Outside Backs (0.73 & 0.89 collisions·min(-1) vs 0.28 & 0.41 collisions·min(-1) respectively). The results of the present study provide information on the positional physical requirements of performance in prolonged periods involving multiple high intensity bursts of effort. Although the current state of GPS micro-technology as a measurement tool does not permit reporting of collision intensity or acceleration data, the combined use of video and GPS provides valuable information to the practitioner. This can be used to match and replicate game demands in training. Public Library of Science 2017-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5433699/ /pubmed/28510582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177072 Text en © 2017 Reardon et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Reardon, Cillian
Tobin, Daniel P.
Tierney, Peter
Delahunt, Eamonn
The worst case scenario: Locomotor and collision demands of the longest periods of gameplay in professional rugby union
title The worst case scenario: Locomotor and collision demands of the longest periods of gameplay in professional rugby union
title_full The worst case scenario: Locomotor and collision demands of the longest periods of gameplay in professional rugby union
title_fullStr The worst case scenario: Locomotor and collision demands of the longest periods of gameplay in professional rugby union
title_full_unstemmed The worst case scenario: Locomotor and collision demands of the longest periods of gameplay in professional rugby union
title_short The worst case scenario: Locomotor and collision demands of the longest periods of gameplay in professional rugby union
title_sort worst case scenario: locomotor and collision demands of the longest periods of gameplay in professional rugby union
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5433699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28510582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177072
work_keys_str_mv AT reardoncillian theworstcasescenariolocomotorandcollisiondemandsofthelongestperiodsofgameplayinprofessionalrugbyunion
AT tobindanielp theworstcasescenariolocomotorandcollisiondemandsofthelongestperiodsofgameplayinprofessionalrugbyunion
AT tierneypeter theworstcasescenariolocomotorandcollisiondemandsofthelongestperiodsofgameplayinprofessionalrugbyunion
AT delahunteamonn theworstcasescenariolocomotorandcollisiondemandsofthelongestperiodsofgameplayinprofessionalrugbyunion
AT reardoncillian worstcasescenariolocomotorandcollisiondemandsofthelongestperiodsofgameplayinprofessionalrugbyunion
AT tobindanielp worstcasescenariolocomotorandcollisiondemandsofthelongestperiodsofgameplayinprofessionalrugbyunion
AT tierneypeter worstcasescenariolocomotorandcollisiondemandsofthelongestperiodsofgameplayinprofessionalrugbyunion
AT delahunteamonn worstcasescenariolocomotorandcollisiondemandsofthelongestperiodsofgameplayinprofessionalrugbyunion