Cargando…
Humans treat unreliable filled-in percepts as more real than veridical ones
Humans often evaluate sensory signals according to their reliability for optimal decision-making. However, how do we evaluate percepts generated in the absence of direct input that are, therefore, completely unreliable? Here, we utilize the phenomenon of filling-in occurring at the physiological bli...
Autores principales: | Ehinger, Benedikt V, Häusser, Katja, Ossandón, José P, König, Peter |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5433845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28506359 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21761 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Is artists' perception more veridical?
por: Perdreau, Florian, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Signs and wonder: There’s more than one way to hear a story
por: Tudiver, Sari Lubitsch
Publicado: (2022) -
Neural bandwidth of veridical perception across the visual field
por: Wilkinson, Michael O., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
It's not easy seeing green: The veridical perception of small spots
por: Vanston, John Erik, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Veridical data science
por: Yu, Bin, et al.
Publicado: (2020)