Cargando…

The evolution of the major histocompatibility complex in upstream versus downstream river populations of the longnose dace

Populations in upstream versus downstream river locations can be exposed to vastly different environmental and ecological conditions and can thus harbor different genetic resources due to selection and neutral processes. An interesting question is how upstream–downstream directionality in rivers aff...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crispo, Erika, Tunna, Haley R., Hussain, Noreen, Rodriguez, Silvia S., Pavey, Scott A., Jackson, Leland J., Rogers, Sean M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5433983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28515867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2839
_version_ 1783236949057732608
author Crispo, Erika
Tunna, Haley R.
Hussain, Noreen
Rodriguez, Silvia S.
Pavey, Scott A.
Jackson, Leland J.
Rogers, Sean M.
author_facet Crispo, Erika
Tunna, Haley R.
Hussain, Noreen
Rodriguez, Silvia S.
Pavey, Scott A.
Jackson, Leland J.
Rogers, Sean M.
author_sort Crispo, Erika
collection PubMed
description Populations in upstream versus downstream river locations can be exposed to vastly different environmental and ecological conditions and can thus harbor different genetic resources due to selection and neutral processes. An interesting question is how upstream–downstream directionality in rivers affects the evolution of immune response genes. We used next‐generation amplicon sequencing to identify eight alleles of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II β exon 2 in the cyprinid longnose dace (Rhinichthys cataractae) from three rivers in Alberta, upstream and downstream of municipal and agricultural areas along contaminant gradients. We used these data to test for directional and balancing selection on the MHC. We also genotyped microsatellite loci to examine neutral population processes in this system. We found evidence for balancing selection on the MHC in the form of increased nonsynonymous variation relative to neutral expectations, and selection occurred at more amino acid residues upstream than downstream in two rivers. We found this pattern despite no population structure or isolation by distance, based on microsatellite data, at these sites. Overall, our results suggest that MHC evolution is driven by upstream–downstream directionality in fish inhabiting this system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5433983
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54339832017-05-17 The evolution of the major histocompatibility complex in upstream versus downstream river populations of the longnose dace Crispo, Erika Tunna, Haley R. Hussain, Noreen Rodriguez, Silvia S. Pavey, Scott A. Jackson, Leland J. Rogers, Sean M. Ecol Evol Original Research Populations in upstream versus downstream river locations can be exposed to vastly different environmental and ecological conditions and can thus harbor different genetic resources due to selection and neutral processes. An interesting question is how upstream–downstream directionality in rivers affects the evolution of immune response genes. We used next‐generation amplicon sequencing to identify eight alleles of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II β exon 2 in the cyprinid longnose dace (Rhinichthys cataractae) from three rivers in Alberta, upstream and downstream of municipal and agricultural areas along contaminant gradients. We used these data to test for directional and balancing selection on the MHC. We also genotyped microsatellite loci to examine neutral population processes in this system. We found evidence for balancing selection on the MHC in the form of increased nonsynonymous variation relative to neutral expectations, and selection occurred at more amino acid residues upstream than downstream in two rivers. We found this pattern despite no population structure or isolation by distance, based on microsatellite data, at these sites. Overall, our results suggest that MHC evolution is driven by upstream–downstream directionality in fish inhabiting this system. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5433983/ /pubmed/28515867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2839 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Crispo, Erika
Tunna, Haley R.
Hussain, Noreen
Rodriguez, Silvia S.
Pavey, Scott A.
Jackson, Leland J.
Rogers, Sean M.
The evolution of the major histocompatibility complex in upstream versus downstream river populations of the longnose dace
title The evolution of the major histocompatibility complex in upstream versus downstream river populations of the longnose dace
title_full The evolution of the major histocompatibility complex in upstream versus downstream river populations of the longnose dace
title_fullStr The evolution of the major histocompatibility complex in upstream versus downstream river populations of the longnose dace
title_full_unstemmed The evolution of the major histocompatibility complex in upstream versus downstream river populations of the longnose dace
title_short The evolution of the major histocompatibility complex in upstream versus downstream river populations of the longnose dace
title_sort evolution of the major histocompatibility complex in upstream versus downstream river populations of the longnose dace
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5433983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28515867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2839
work_keys_str_mv AT crispoerika theevolutionofthemajorhistocompatibilitycomplexinupstreamversusdownstreamriverpopulationsofthelongnosedace
AT tunnahaleyr theevolutionofthemajorhistocompatibilitycomplexinupstreamversusdownstreamriverpopulationsofthelongnosedace
AT hussainnoreen theevolutionofthemajorhistocompatibilitycomplexinupstreamversusdownstreamriverpopulationsofthelongnosedace
AT rodriguezsilvias theevolutionofthemajorhistocompatibilitycomplexinupstreamversusdownstreamriverpopulationsofthelongnosedace
AT paveyscotta theevolutionofthemajorhistocompatibilitycomplexinupstreamversusdownstreamriverpopulationsofthelongnosedace
AT jacksonlelandj theevolutionofthemajorhistocompatibilitycomplexinupstreamversusdownstreamriverpopulationsofthelongnosedace
AT rogersseanm theevolutionofthemajorhistocompatibilitycomplexinupstreamversusdownstreamriverpopulationsofthelongnosedace
AT crispoerika evolutionofthemajorhistocompatibilitycomplexinupstreamversusdownstreamriverpopulationsofthelongnosedace
AT tunnahaleyr evolutionofthemajorhistocompatibilitycomplexinupstreamversusdownstreamriverpopulationsofthelongnosedace
AT hussainnoreen evolutionofthemajorhistocompatibilitycomplexinupstreamversusdownstreamriverpopulationsofthelongnosedace
AT rodriguezsilvias evolutionofthemajorhistocompatibilitycomplexinupstreamversusdownstreamriverpopulationsofthelongnosedace
AT paveyscotta evolutionofthemajorhistocompatibilitycomplexinupstreamversusdownstreamriverpopulationsofthelongnosedace
AT jacksonlelandj evolutionofthemajorhistocompatibilitycomplexinupstreamversusdownstreamriverpopulationsofthelongnosedace
AT rogersseanm evolutionofthemajorhistocompatibilitycomplexinupstreamversusdownstreamriverpopulationsofthelongnosedace