Cargando…

Targeting resolution of neuroinflammation after ischemic stroke with a lipoxin A(4) analog: Protective mechanisms and long‐term effects on neurological recovery

BACKGROUND: Resolution of inflammation is an emerging new strategy to reduce damage following ischemic stroke. Lipoxin A(4) (LXA (4)) is an anti‐inflammatory, pro‐resolution lipid mediator that reduces neuroinflammation in stroke. Since LXA (4) is rapidly inactivated, potent analogs have been synthe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hawkins, Kimberly E., DeMars, Kelly M., Alexander, Jon C., de Leon, Lauren G., Pacheco, Sean C., Graves, Christina, Yang, Changjun, McCrea, Austin O., Frankowski, Jan C., Garrett, Timothy J., Febo, Marcelo, Candelario‐Jalil, Eduardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5434193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28523230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.688
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Resolution of inflammation is an emerging new strategy to reduce damage following ischemic stroke. Lipoxin A(4) (LXA (4)) is an anti‐inflammatory, pro‐resolution lipid mediator that reduces neuroinflammation in stroke. Since LXA (4) is rapidly inactivated, potent analogs have been synthesized, including BML‐111. We hypothesized that post‐ischemic, intravenous treatment with BML‐111 for 1 week would provide neuroprotection and reduce neurobehavioral deficits at 4 weeks after ischemic stroke in rats. Additionally, we investigated the potential protective mechanisms of BML‐111 on the post‐stroke molecular and cellular profile. METHODS: A total of 133 male Sprague‐Dawley rats were subjected to 90 min of transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) and BML‐111 administration was started at the time of reperfusion. Two methods of week‐long BML‐111 intravenous administration were tested: continuous infusion via ALZET (®) osmotic pumps (1.25 and 3.75 μg μl(−1) hr(−1)), or freshly prepared daily single injections (0.3, 1, and 3 mg/kg). We report for the first time on the stability of BML‐111 and characterized an optimal dose and a dosing schedule for the administration of BML‐111. RESULTS: One week of BML‐111 intravenous injections did not reduce infarct size or improve behavioral deficits 4 weeks after ischemic stroke. However, post‐ischemic treatment with BML‐111 did elicit early protective effects as demonstrated by a significant reduction in infarct volume and improved sensorimotor function at 1 week after stroke. This protection was associated with reduced pro‐inflammatory cytokine and chemokine levels, decreased M1 CD40+ macrophages, and increased alternatively activated, anti‐inflammatory M2 microglia/macrophage cell populations in the post‐ischemic brain. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that targeting the endogenous LXA (4) pathway could be a promising therapeutic strategy for the treatment of ischemic stroke. More work is necessary to determine whether a different dosing regimen or more stable LXA (4) analogs could confer long‐term protection.