Cargando…
Bone Regeneration Induced by Bone Porcine Block with Bone Marrow Stromal Stem Cells in a Minipig Model of Mandibular “Critical Size” Defect
Introduction. Adding stem cells to biodegradable scaffolds to enhance bone regeneration is a valuable option. Different kinds of stem cells with osteoblastic activity were tested, such as bone marrow stromal stem cells (BMSSCs). Aim. To assess a correct protocol for osteogenic stem cell differentiat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5434233/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28553359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9082869 |
_version_ | 1783237004377456640 |
---|---|
author | Scarano, Antonio Crincoli, Vito Di Benedetto, Adriana Cozzolino, Valerio Lorusso, Felice Podaliri Vulpiani, Michele Grano, Maria Kalemaj, Zamira Mori, Giorgio Grassi, Felice Roberto |
author_facet | Scarano, Antonio Crincoli, Vito Di Benedetto, Adriana Cozzolino, Valerio Lorusso, Felice Podaliri Vulpiani, Michele Grano, Maria Kalemaj, Zamira Mori, Giorgio Grassi, Felice Roberto |
author_sort | Scarano, Antonio |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction. Adding stem cells to biodegradable scaffolds to enhance bone regeneration is a valuable option. Different kinds of stem cells with osteoblastic activity were tested, such as bone marrow stromal stem cells (BMSSCs). Aim. To assess a correct protocol for osteogenic stem cell differentiation, so BMSSCs were seeded on a bone porcine block (BPB). Materials and Methods. Bone marrow from six minipigs was extracted from tibiae and humeri and treated to isolate BMSSCs. After seeding on BPB, critical-size defects were created on each mandible of the minipigs and implanted with BPB and BPB/BMSSCs. After three months, histomorphometric analysis was performed. Results. Histomorphometric analysis provided percentages of the three groups. Tissues present in control defects were 23 ± 2% lamellar bone, 28 ± 1% woven bone, and 56 ± 4% marrow spaces; in BPB defects were 20 ± 5% BPB, 32 ± 2% lamellar bone, 24 ± 1% woven bone, and 28 ± 2% marrow spaces; in BPB/BMSSCs defects were 17 ± 4% BPB/BMSSCs, 42 ± 2% lamellar bone, 12 ± 1% woven bone, and 22 ± 3% marrow spaces. Conclusion. BPB used as a scaffold to induce bone regeneration may benefit from the addition of BDPSCs in the tissue-engineered constructs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5434233 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54342332017-05-28 Bone Regeneration Induced by Bone Porcine Block with Bone Marrow Stromal Stem Cells in a Minipig Model of Mandibular “Critical Size” Defect Scarano, Antonio Crincoli, Vito Di Benedetto, Adriana Cozzolino, Valerio Lorusso, Felice Podaliri Vulpiani, Michele Grano, Maria Kalemaj, Zamira Mori, Giorgio Grassi, Felice Roberto Stem Cells Int Research Article Introduction. Adding stem cells to biodegradable scaffolds to enhance bone regeneration is a valuable option. Different kinds of stem cells with osteoblastic activity were tested, such as bone marrow stromal stem cells (BMSSCs). Aim. To assess a correct protocol for osteogenic stem cell differentiation, so BMSSCs were seeded on a bone porcine block (BPB). Materials and Methods. Bone marrow from six minipigs was extracted from tibiae and humeri and treated to isolate BMSSCs. After seeding on BPB, critical-size defects were created on each mandible of the minipigs and implanted with BPB and BPB/BMSSCs. After three months, histomorphometric analysis was performed. Results. Histomorphometric analysis provided percentages of the three groups. Tissues present in control defects were 23 ± 2% lamellar bone, 28 ± 1% woven bone, and 56 ± 4% marrow spaces; in BPB defects were 20 ± 5% BPB, 32 ± 2% lamellar bone, 24 ± 1% woven bone, and 28 ± 2% marrow spaces; in BPB/BMSSCs defects were 17 ± 4% BPB/BMSSCs, 42 ± 2% lamellar bone, 12 ± 1% woven bone, and 22 ± 3% marrow spaces. Conclusion. BPB used as a scaffold to induce bone regeneration may benefit from the addition of BDPSCs in the tissue-engineered constructs. Hindawi 2017 2017-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5434233/ /pubmed/28553359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9082869 Text en Copyright © 2017 Antonio Scarano et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Scarano, Antonio Crincoli, Vito Di Benedetto, Adriana Cozzolino, Valerio Lorusso, Felice Podaliri Vulpiani, Michele Grano, Maria Kalemaj, Zamira Mori, Giorgio Grassi, Felice Roberto Bone Regeneration Induced by Bone Porcine Block with Bone Marrow Stromal Stem Cells in a Minipig Model of Mandibular “Critical Size” Defect |
title | Bone Regeneration Induced by Bone Porcine Block with Bone Marrow Stromal Stem Cells in a Minipig Model of Mandibular “Critical Size” Defect |
title_full | Bone Regeneration Induced by Bone Porcine Block with Bone Marrow Stromal Stem Cells in a Minipig Model of Mandibular “Critical Size” Defect |
title_fullStr | Bone Regeneration Induced by Bone Porcine Block with Bone Marrow Stromal Stem Cells in a Minipig Model of Mandibular “Critical Size” Defect |
title_full_unstemmed | Bone Regeneration Induced by Bone Porcine Block with Bone Marrow Stromal Stem Cells in a Minipig Model of Mandibular “Critical Size” Defect |
title_short | Bone Regeneration Induced by Bone Porcine Block with Bone Marrow Stromal Stem Cells in a Minipig Model of Mandibular “Critical Size” Defect |
title_sort | bone regeneration induced by bone porcine block with bone marrow stromal stem cells in a minipig model of mandibular “critical size” defect |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5434233/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28553359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9082869 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scaranoantonio boneregenerationinducedbyboneporcineblockwithbonemarrowstromalstemcellsinaminipigmodelofmandibularcriticalsizedefect AT crincolivito boneregenerationinducedbyboneporcineblockwithbonemarrowstromalstemcellsinaminipigmodelofmandibularcriticalsizedefect AT dibenedettoadriana boneregenerationinducedbyboneporcineblockwithbonemarrowstromalstemcellsinaminipigmodelofmandibularcriticalsizedefect AT cozzolinovalerio boneregenerationinducedbyboneporcineblockwithbonemarrowstromalstemcellsinaminipigmodelofmandibularcriticalsizedefect AT lorussofelice boneregenerationinducedbyboneporcineblockwithbonemarrowstromalstemcellsinaminipigmodelofmandibularcriticalsizedefect AT podalirivulpianimichele boneregenerationinducedbyboneporcineblockwithbonemarrowstromalstemcellsinaminipigmodelofmandibularcriticalsizedefect AT granomaria boneregenerationinducedbyboneporcineblockwithbonemarrowstromalstemcellsinaminipigmodelofmandibularcriticalsizedefect AT kalemajzamira boneregenerationinducedbyboneporcineblockwithbonemarrowstromalstemcellsinaminipigmodelofmandibularcriticalsizedefect AT morigiorgio boneregenerationinducedbyboneporcineblockwithbonemarrowstromalstemcellsinaminipigmodelofmandibularcriticalsizedefect AT grassifeliceroberto boneregenerationinducedbyboneporcineblockwithbonemarrowstromalstemcellsinaminipigmodelofmandibularcriticalsizedefect |