Cargando…
Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Upper Urinary Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) are both alternatives for PCNL to treat renal calculi. This study is aimed at comparing the stone-free rate (SFR) and other surgery parameters of two approaches for treating upper urinary calculi. We...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5434463/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28553645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2035851 |
_version_ | 1783237053004120064 |
---|---|
author | Jiang, Hongyang Yu, Zhe Chen, Liping Wang, Tao Liu, Zhuo Liu, Jihong Wang, Shaogang Ye, Zhangqun |
author_facet | Jiang, Hongyang Yu, Zhe Chen, Liping Wang, Tao Liu, Zhuo Liu, Jihong Wang, Shaogang Ye, Zhangqun |
author_sort | Jiang, Hongyang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) are both alternatives for PCNL to treat renal calculi. This study is aimed at comparing the stone-free rate (SFR) and other surgery parameters of two approaches for treating upper urinary calculi. We performed this meta-analysis in September 2016 by searching studies about mini-PCNL and RIRS for treating upper urinary calculi in various databases, and RevMan v.5.3 was applied. Three randomized controlled trials and ten nonrandomized trials were included, involving a total of 1317 patients. Meta-analysis showed that mini-PCNL group led to a higher SFR [odds ratio: 1.96; 95% confidence interval: 1.46–2.64; P < 0.00001] but brought a larger postoperative decrease in hemoglobin levels compared with RIRS. RIRS provided a shorter hospital time. There was no significant difference in operation time. Higher postoperative complications were detected in the mini-PCNL, but the difference was not significant. Grade I and III complications did not vary between two procedures, but grade II complications were of lower incidence in RIRS group. In the light of these results, compared with RIRS, mini-PCNL provided significantly higher SFR and efficiency quotient for managing calculi; however, it resulted in higher incidence of postoperative complications, larger hemoglobin drops, and longer hospital stay. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5434463 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54344632017-05-28 Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Upper Urinary Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Jiang, Hongyang Yu, Zhe Chen, Liping Wang, Tao Liu, Zhuo Liu, Jihong Wang, Shaogang Ye, Zhangqun Biomed Res Int Review Article Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) are both alternatives for PCNL to treat renal calculi. This study is aimed at comparing the stone-free rate (SFR) and other surgery parameters of two approaches for treating upper urinary calculi. We performed this meta-analysis in September 2016 by searching studies about mini-PCNL and RIRS for treating upper urinary calculi in various databases, and RevMan v.5.3 was applied. Three randomized controlled trials and ten nonrandomized trials were included, involving a total of 1317 patients. Meta-analysis showed that mini-PCNL group led to a higher SFR [odds ratio: 1.96; 95% confidence interval: 1.46–2.64; P < 0.00001] but brought a larger postoperative decrease in hemoglobin levels compared with RIRS. RIRS provided a shorter hospital time. There was no significant difference in operation time. Higher postoperative complications were detected in the mini-PCNL, but the difference was not significant. Grade I and III complications did not vary between two procedures, but grade II complications were of lower incidence in RIRS group. In the light of these results, compared with RIRS, mini-PCNL provided significantly higher SFR and efficiency quotient for managing calculi; however, it resulted in higher incidence of postoperative complications, larger hemoglobin drops, and longer hospital stay. Hindawi 2017 2017-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5434463/ /pubmed/28553645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2035851 Text en Copyright © 2017 Hongyang Jiang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Jiang, Hongyang Yu, Zhe Chen, Liping Wang, Tao Liu, Zhuo Liu, Jihong Wang, Shaogang Ye, Zhangqun Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Upper Urinary Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Upper Urinary Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Upper Urinary Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Upper Urinary Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Upper Urinary Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Upper Urinary Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for upper urinary stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5434463/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28553645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2035851 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jianghongyang minimallyinvasivepercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryforupperurinarystonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yuzhe minimallyinvasivepercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryforupperurinarystonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chenliping minimallyinvasivepercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryforupperurinarystonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangtao minimallyinvasivepercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryforupperurinarystonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liuzhuo minimallyinvasivepercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryforupperurinarystonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liujihong minimallyinvasivepercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryforupperurinarystonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangshaogang minimallyinvasivepercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryforupperurinarystonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yezhangqun minimallyinvasivepercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryforupperurinarystonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |