Cargando…

Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Upper Urinary Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) are both alternatives for PCNL to treat renal calculi. This study is aimed at comparing the stone-free rate (SFR) and other surgery parameters of two approaches for treating upper urinary calculi. We...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiang, Hongyang, Yu, Zhe, Chen, Liping, Wang, Tao, Liu, Zhuo, Liu, Jihong, Wang, Shaogang, Ye, Zhangqun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5434463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28553645
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2035851
_version_ 1783237053004120064
author Jiang, Hongyang
Yu, Zhe
Chen, Liping
Wang, Tao
Liu, Zhuo
Liu, Jihong
Wang, Shaogang
Ye, Zhangqun
author_facet Jiang, Hongyang
Yu, Zhe
Chen, Liping
Wang, Tao
Liu, Zhuo
Liu, Jihong
Wang, Shaogang
Ye, Zhangqun
author_sort Jiang, Hongyang
collection PubMed
description Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) are both alternatives for PCNL to treat renal calculi. This study is aimed at comparing the stone-free rate (SFR) and other surgery parameters of two approaches for treating upper urinary calculi. We performed this meta-analysis in September 2016 by searching studies about mini-PCNL and RIRS for treating upper urinary calculi in various databases, and RevMan v.5.3 was applied. Three randomized controlled trials and ten nonrandomized trials were included, involving a total of 1317 patients. Meta-analysis showed that mini-PCNL group led to a higher SFR [odds ratio: 1.96; 95% confidence interval: 1.46–2.64; P < 0.00001] but brought a larger postoperative decrease in hemoglobin levels compared with RIRS. RIRS provided a shorter hospital time. There was no significant difference in operation time. Higher postoperative complications were detected in the mini-PCNL, but the difference was not significant. Grade I and III complications did not vary between two procedures, but grade II complications were of lower incidence in RIRS group. In the light of these results, compared with RIRS, mini-PCNL provided significantly higher SFR and efficiency quotient for managing calculi; however, it resulted in higher incidence of postoperative complications, larger hemoglobin drops, and longer hospital stay.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5434463
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54344632017-05-28 Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Upper Urinary Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Jiang, Hongyang Yu, Zhe Chen, Liping Wang, Tao Liu, Zhuo Liu, Jihong Wang, Shaogang Ye, Zhangqun Biomed Res Int Review Article Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) are both alternatives for PCNL to treat renal calculi. This study is aimed at comparing the stone-free rate (SFR) and other surgery parameters of two approaches for treating upper urinary calculi. We performed this meta-analysis in September 2016 by searching studies about mini-PCNL and RIRS for treating upper urinary calculi in various databases, and RevMan v.5.3 was applied. Three randomized controlled trials and ten nonrandomized trials were included, involving a total of 1317 patients. Meta-analysis showed that mini-PCNL group led to a higher SFR [odds ratio: 1.96; 95% confidence interval: 1.46–2.64; P < 0.00001] but brought a larger postoperative decrease in hemoglobin levels compared with RIRS. RIRS provided a shorter hospital time. There was no significant difference in operation time. Higher postoperative complications were detected in the mini-PCNL, but the difference was not significant. Grade I and III complications did not vary between two procedures, but grade II complications were of lower incidence in RIRS group. In the light of these results, compared with RIRS, mini-PCNL provided significantly higher SFR and efficiency quotient for managing calculi; however, it resulted in higher incidence of postoperative complications, larger hemoglobin drops, and longer hospital stay. Hindawi 2017 2017-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5434463/ /pubmed/28553645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2035851 Text en Copyright © 2017 Hongyang Jiang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Jiang, Hongyang
Yu, Zhe
Chen, Liping
Wang, Tao
Liu, Zhuo
Liu, Jihong
Wang, Shaogang
Ye, Zhangqun
Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Upper Urinary Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Upper Urinary Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Upper Urinary Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Upper Urinary Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Upper Urinary Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Upper Urinary Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for upper urinary stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5434463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28553645
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2035851
work_keys_str_mv AT jianghongyang minimallyinvasivepercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryforupperurinarystonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yuzhe minimallyinvasivepercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryforupperurinarystonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenliping minimallyinvasivepercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryforupperurinarystonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangtao minimallyinvasivepercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryforupperurinarystonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuzhuo minimallyinvasivepercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryforupperurinarystonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liujihong minimallyinvasivepercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryforupperurinarystonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangshaogang minimallyinvasivepercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryforupperurinarystonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yezhangqun minimallyinvasivepercutaneousnephrolithotomyversusretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryforupperurinarystonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis