Cargando…

Sex differences in rat placental development: from pre-implantation to late gestation

BACKGROUND: A male fetus is suggested to be more susceptible to in utero and birth complications. This may be due in part to altered morphology or function of the XY placenta. We hypothesised that sexual dimorphism begins at the blastocyst stage with sex differences in the progenitor trophectoderm (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kalisch-Smith, J. I., Simmons, D. G., Pantaleon, M., Moritz, K. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5434533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28523122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13293-017-0138-6
_version_ 1783237063940767744
author Kalisch-Smith, J. I.
Simmons, D. G.
Pantaleon, M.
Moritz, K. M.
author_facet Kalisch-Smith, J. I.
Simmons, D. G.
Pantaleon, M.
Moritz, K. M.
author_sort Kalisch-Smith, J. I.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A male fetus is suggested to be more susceptible to in utero and birth complications. This may be due in part to altered morphology or function of the XY placenta. We hypothesised that sexual dimorphism begins at the blastocyst stage with sex differences in the progenitor trophectoderm (TE) and its derived trophoblast lineages, as these cells populate the majority of cell types within the placenta. We investigated sex-specific differences in cell allocation in the pre-implantation embryo and further characterised growth and gene expression of the placental compartments from the early stages of the definitive placenta through to late gestation. METHODS: Naturally mated Sprague Dawley dams were used to collect blastocysts at embryonic day (E) 5 to characterise cell allocation; total, TE, and inner cell mass (ICM), and differentiation to downstream trophoblast cell types. Placental tissues were collected at E13, E15, and E20 to characterise volumes of placental compartments, and sex-specific gene expression profiles. RESULTS: Pre-implantation embryos showed no sex differences in cell allocation (total, TE and ICM) or early trophoblast differentiation, assessed by outgrowth area, number and ploidy of trophoblasts and P-TGCs, and expression of markers of trophoblast stem cell state or differentiation. Whilst no changes in placental structures were found in the immature E13 placenta, the definitive E15 placenta from female fetuses had reduced labyrinthine volume, fetal and maternal blood space volume, as well as fetal blood space surface area, when compared to placentas from males. No differences between the sexes in labyrinth trophoblast volume or interhaemal membrane thickness were found. By E20 these sex-specific placental differences were no longer present, but female fetuses weighed less than their male counterparts. Coupled with expression profiles from E13 and E15 placental samples may suggest a developmental delay in placental differentiation. CONCLUSIONS: Although there were no overt differences in blastocyst cell number or early placental development, reduced growth of the female labyrinth in mid gestation is likely to contribute to lower fetal weight in females at E20. These data suggest sex differences in fetal growth trajectories are due at least in part, to differences in placenta growth. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13293-017-0138-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5434533
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54345332017-05-18 Sex differences in rat placental development: from pre-implantation to late gestation Kalisch-Smith, J. I. Simmons, D. G. Pantaleon, M. Moritz, K. M. Biol Sex Differ Research BACKGROUND: A male fetus is suggested to be more susceptible to in utero and birth complications. This may be due in part to altered morphology or function of the XY placenta. We hypothesised that sexual dimorphism begins at the blastocyst stage with sex differences in the progenitor trophectoderm (TE) and its derived trophoblast lineages, as these cells populate the majority of cell types within the placenta. We investigated sex-specific differences in cell allocation in the pre-implantation embryo and further characterised growth and gene expression of the placental compartments from the early stages of the definitive placenta through to late gestation. METHODS: Naturally mated Sprague Dawley dams were used to collect blastocysts at embryonic day (E) 5 to characterise cell allocation; total, TE, and inner cell mass (ICM), and differentiation to downstream trophoblast cell types. Placental tissues were collected at E13, E15, and E20 to characterise volumes of placental compartments, and sex-specific gene expression profiles. RESULTS: Pre-implantation embryos showed no sex differences in cell allocation (total, TE and ICM) or early trophoblast differentiation, assessed by outgrowth area, number and ploidy of trophoblasts and P-TGCs, and expression of markers of trophoblast stem cell state or differentiation. Whilst no changes in placental structures were found in the immature E13 placenta, the definitive E15 placenta from female fetuses had reduced labyrinthine volume, fetal and maternal blood space volume, as well as fetal blood space surface area, when compared to placentas from males. No differences between the sexes in labyrinth trophoblast volume or interhaemal membrane thickness were found. By E20 these sex-specific placental differences were no longer present, but female fetuses weighed less than their male counterparts. Coupled with expression profiles from E13 and E15 placental samples may suggest a developmental delay in placental differentiation. CONCLUSIONS: Although there were no overt differences in blastocyst cell number or early placental development, reduced growth of the female labyrinth in mid gestation is likely to contribute to lower fetal weight in females at E20. These data suggest sex differences in fetal growth trajectories are due at least in part, to differences in placenta growth. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13293-017-0138-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5434533/ /pubmed/28523122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13293-017-0138-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Kalisch-Smith, J. I.
Simmons, D. G.
Pantaleon, M.
Moritz, K. M.
Sex differences in rat placental development: from pre-implantation to late gestation
title Sex differences in rat placental development: from pre-implantation to late gestation
title_full Sex differences in rat placental development: from pre-implantation to late gestation
title_fullStr Sex differences in rat placental development: from pre-implantation to late gestation
title_full_unstemmed Sex differences in rat placental development: from pre-implantation to late gestation
title_short Sex differences in rat placental development: from pre-implantation to late gestation
title_sort sex differences in rat placental development: from pre-implantation to late gestation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5434533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28523122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13293-017-0138-6
work_keys_str_mv AT kalischsmithji sexdifferencesinratplacentaldevelopmentfrompreimplantationtolategestation
AT simmonsdg sexdifferencesinratplacentaldevelopmentfrompreimplantationtolategestation
AT pantaleonm sexdifferencesinratplacentaldevelopmentfrompreimplantationtolategestation
AT moritzkm sexdifferencesinratplacentaldevelopmentfrompreimplantationtolategestation