Cargando…

What we learned from extended culture of ‘rejected’ day-3 cleavage stage embryos: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: To test whether poor quality day-3 embryos can undergo successful blastulation and implantation. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted. Whether or not a good quality embryo was transferred on day-3, poor quality (rejected) embryos were further cultured and followed. The clini...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hershko Klement, Anat, Ovadia, Michal, Wiser, Amir, Berkovitz, Arie, Shavit, Tal, Nemerovsky, Luba, Ghetler, Yehudith, Cohen, Ilan, Shulman, Adrian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5434534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28511712
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-017-0332-5
_version_ 1783237064186134528
author Hershko Klement, Anat
Ovadia, Michal
Wiser, Amir
Berkovitz, Arie
Shavit, Tal
Nemerovsky, Luba
Ghetler, Yehudith
Cohen, Ilan
Shulman, Adrian
author_facet Hershko Klement, Anat
Ovadia, Michal
Wiser, Amir
Berkovitz, Arie
Shavit, Tal
Nemerovsky, Luba
Ghetler, Yehudith
Cohen, Ilan
Shulman, Adrian
author_sort Hershko Klement, Anat
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To test whether poor quality day-3 embryos can undergo successful blastulation and implantation. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted. Whether or not a good quality embryo was transferred on day-3, poor quality (rejected) embryos were further cultured and followed. The clinical outcome of each embryo was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 694 rejected embryos (from 205 patients) were included, with a blastulation rate of 21.2% (147 embryos) compared to 64.2% general blastulation rate reported by our laboratory (P < 0.01). In a multivariate logistic regression model, only their grade on day-3 significantly affected blastulation (P = 0.01). A total of 97 embryos attained eligibility for fresh transfer or cryopreservation, only 6 of which resulted from a day-3 embryo scored < 2. Of these, 52 were transferred, resulting in 21 pregnancies (16 clinical and 5 chemical). In summary, 694 cultured embryos yielded 16 clinical pregnancies; a 2.3% clinical pregnancy rate. CONCLUSIONS: Low score day-3 embryos can result in successful blastulation and clinical pregnancies. However, the normal blastulation rate is poor.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5434534
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54345342017-05-18 What we learned from extended culture of ‘rejected’ day-3 cleavage stage embryos: a prospective cohort study Hershko Klement, Anat Ovadia, Michal Wiser, Amir Berkovitz, Arie Shavit, Tal Nemerovsky, Luba Ghetler, Yehudith Cohen, Ilan Shulman, Adrian J Ovarian Res Research BACKGROUND: To test whether poor quality day-3 embryos can undergo successful blastulation and implantation. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted. Whether or not a good quality embryo was transferred on day-3, poor quality (rejected) embryos were further cultured and followed. The clinical outcome of each embryo was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 694 rejected embryos (from 205 patients) were included, with a blastulation rate of 21.2% (147 embryos) compared to 64.2% general blastulation rate reported by our laboratory (P < 0.01). In a multivariate logistic regression model, only their grade on day-3 significantly affected blastulation (P = 0.01). A total of 97 embryos attained eligibility for fresh transfer or cryopreservation, only 6 of which resulted from a day-3 embryo scored < 2. Of these, 52 were transferred, resulting in 21 pregnancies (16 clinical and 5 chemical). In summary, 694 cultured embryos yielded 16 clinical pregnancies; a 2.3% clinical pregnancy rate. CONCLUSIONS: Low score day-3 embryos can result in successful blastulation and clinical pregnancies. However, the normal blastulation rate is poor. BioMed Central 2017-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5434534/ /pubmed/28511712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-017-0332-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Hershko Klement, Anat
Ovadia, Michal
Wiser, Amir
Berkovitz, Arie
Shavit, Tal
Nemerovsky, Luba
Ghetler, Yehudith
Cohen, Ilan
Shulman, Adrian
What we learned from extended culture of ‘rejected’ day-3 cleavage stage embryos: a prospective cohort study
title What we learned from extended culture of ‘rejected’ day-3 cleavage stage embryos: a prospective cohort study
title_full What we learned from extended culture of ‘rejected’ day-3 cleavage stage embryos: a prospective cohort study
title_fullStr What we learned from extended culture of ‘rejected’ day-3 cleavage stage embryos: a prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed What we learned from extended culture of ‘rejected’ day-3 cleavage stage embryos: a prospective cohort study
title_short What we learned from extended culture of ‘rejected’ day-3 cleavage stage embryos: a prospective cohort study
title_sort what we learned from extended culture of ‘rejected’ day-3 cleavage stage embryos: a prospective cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5434534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28511712
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-017-0332-5
work_keys_str_mv AT hershkoklementanat whatwelearnedfromextendedcultureofrejectedday3cleavagestageembryosaprospectivecohortstudy
AT ovadiamichal whatwelearnedfromextendedcultureofrejectedday3cleavagestageembryosaprospectivecohortstudy
AT wiseramir whatwelearnedfromextendedcultureofrejectedday3cleavagestageembryosaprospectivecohortstudy
AT berkovitzarie whatwelearnedfromextendedcultureofrejectedday3cleavagestageembryosaprospectivecohortstudy
AT shavittal whatwelearnedfromextendedcultureofrejectedday3cleavagestageembryosaprospectivecohortstudy
AT nemerovskyluba whatwelearnedfromextendedcultureofrejectedday3cleavagestageembryosaprospectivecohortstudy
AT ghetleryehudith whatwelearnedfromextendedcultureofrejectedday3cleavagestageembryosaprospectivecohortstudy
AT cohenilan whatwelearnedfromextendedcultureofrejectedday3cleavagestageembryosaprospectivecohortstudy
AT shulmanadrian whatwelearnedfromextendedcultureofrejectedday3cleavagestageembryosaprospectivecohortstudy