Cargando…
What we learned from extended culture of ‘rejected’ day-3 cleavage stage embryos: a prospective cohort study
BACKGROUND: To test whether poor quality day-3 embryos can undergo successful blastulation and implantation. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted. Whether or not a good quality embryo was transferred on day-3, poor quality (rejected) embryos were further cultured and followed. The clini...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5434534/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28511712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-017-0332-5 |
_version_ | 1783237064186134528 |
---|---|
author | Hershko Klement, Anat Ovadia, Michal Wiser, Amir Berkovitz, Arie Shavit, Tal Nemerovsky, Luba Ghetler, Yehudith Cohen, Ilan Shulman, Adrian |
author_facet | Hershko Klement, Anat Ovadia, Michal Wiser, Amir Berkovitz, Arie Shavit, Tal Nemerovsky, Luba Ghetler, Yehudith Cohen, Ilan Shulman, Adrian |
author_sort | Hershko Klement, Anat |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To test whether poor quality day-3 embryos can undergo successful blastulation and implantation. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted. Whether or not a good quality embryo was transferred on day-3, poor quality (rejected) embryos were further cultured and followed. The clinical outcome of each embryo was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 694 rejected embryos (from 205 patients) were included, with a blastulation rate of 21.2% (147 embryos) compared to 64.2% general blastulation rate reported by our laboratory (P < 0.01). In a multivariate logistic regression model, only their grade on day-3 significantly affected blastulation (P = 0.01). A total of 97 embryos attained eligibility for fresh transfer or cryopreservation, only 6 of which resulted from a day-3 embryo scored < 2. Of these, 52 were transferred, resulting in 21 pregnancies (16 clinical and 5 chemical). In summary, 694 cultured embryos yielded 16 clinical pregnancies; a 2.3% clinical pregnancy rate. CONCLUSIONS: Low score day-3 embryos can result in successful blastulation and clinical pregnancies. However, the normal blastulation rate is poor. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5434534 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54345342017-05-18 What we learned from extended culture of ‘rejected’ day-3 cleavage stage embryos: a prospective cohort study Hershko Klement, Anat Ovadia, Michal Wiser, Amir Berkovitz, Arie Shavit, Tal Nemerovsky, Luba Ghetler, Yehudith Cohen, Ilan Shulman, Adrian J Ovarian Res Research BACKGROUND: To test whether poor quality day-3 embryos can undergo successful blastulation and implantation. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted. Whether or not a good quality embryo was transferred on day-3, poor quality (rejected) embryos were further cultured and followed. The clinical outcome of each embryo was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 694 rejected embryos (from 205 patients) were included, with a blastulation rate of 21.2% (147 embryos) compared to 64.2% general blastulation rate reported by our laboratory (P < 0.01). In a multivariate logistic regression model, only their grade on day-3 significantly affected blastulation (P = 0.01). A total of 97 embryos attained eligibility for fresh transfer or cryopreservation, only 6 of which resulted from a day-3 embryo scored < 2. Of these, 52 were transferred, resulting in 21 pregnancies (16 clinical and 5 chemical). In summary, 694 cultured embryos yielded 16 clinical pregnancies; a 2.3% clinical pregnancy rate. CONCLUSIONS: Low score day-3 embryos can result in successful blastulation and clinical pregnancies. However, the normal blastulation rate is poor. BioMed Central 2017-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5434534/ /pubmed/28511712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-017-0332-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Hershko Klement, Anat Ovadia, Michal Wiser, Amir Berkovitz, Arie Shavit, Tal Nemerovsky, Luba Ghetler, Yehudith Cohen, Ilan Shulman, Adrian What we learned from extended culture of ‘rejected’ day-3 cleavage stage embryos: a prospective cohort study |
title | What we learned from extended culture of ‘rejected’ day-3 cleavage stage embryos: a prospective cohort study |
title_full | What we learned from extended culture of ‘rejected’ day-3 cleavage stage embryos: a prospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | What we learned from extended culture of ‘rejected’ day-3 cleavage stage embryos: a prospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | What we learned from extended culture of ‘rejected’ day-3 cleavage stage embryos: a prospective cohort study |
title_short | What we learned from extended culture of ‘rejected’ day-3 cleavage stage embryos: a prospective cohort study |
title_sort | what we learned from extended culture of ‘rejected’ day-3 cleavage stage embryos: a prospective cohort study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5434534/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28511712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-017-0332-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hershkoklementanat whatwelearnedfromextendedcultureofrejectedday3cleavagestageembryosaprospectivecohortstudy AT ovadiamichal whatwelearnedfromextendedcultureofrejectedday3cleavagestageembryosaprospectivecohortstudy AT wiseramir whatwelearnedfromextendedcultureofrejectedday3cleavagestageembryosaprospectivecohortstudy AT berkovitzarie whatwelearnedfromextendedcultureofrejectedday3cleavagestageembryosaprospectivecohortstudy AT shavittal whatwelearnedfromextendedcultureofrejectedday3cleavagestageembryosaprospectivecohortstudy AT nemerovskyluba whatwelearnedfromextendedcultureofrejectedday3cleavagestageembryosaprospectivecohortstudy AT ghetleryehudith whatwelearnedfromextendedcultureofrejectedday3cleavagestageembryosaprospectivecohortstudy AT cohenilan whatwelearnedfromextendedcultureofrejectedday3cleavagestageembryosaprospectivecohortstudy AT shulmanadrian whatwelearnedfromextendedcultureofrejectedday3cleavagestageembryosaprospectivecohortstudy |