Cargando…

A randomized comparison of flow characteristics of semiskeletonized and pedicled internal thoracic artery preparations in coronary artery bypass

BACKGROUND: Harvesting the internal thoracic artery (ITA) with semiskeletonization is an alternative technique between conventional wide pedicle and skeletonization. It is almost as simple as pedicle harvesting; however, it is supposed to provide the advantage of graft flow and length. Since the hea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Satdhabudha, Opas, Noppawinyoowong, Narupa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5434624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28511656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-017-0589-1
_version_ 1783237085982883840
author Satdhabudha, Opas
Noppawinyoowong, Narupa
author_facet Satdhabudha, Opas
Noppawinyoowong, Narupa
author_sort Satdhabudha, Opas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Harvesting the internal thoracic artery (ITA) with semiskeletonization is an alternative technique between conventional wide pedicle and skeletonization. It is almost as simple as pedicle harvesting; however, it is supposed to provide the advantage of graft flow and length. Since the heart is unique being the only organ which is perfused during diastole, for comparing the intraoperative graft flow characteristics of semiskeletonization and pedicle technique, we used diastolic filling (DF) using transit-time flow measurement as a primary result. The objective of this study is to compare if semiskeletonized ITA has a greater effect on the intraoperative DF of graft flow versus conventional pedicled ITA in coronary artery bypass. METHODS: Between July 2015 and May 2016, a prospective evaluation of 60 consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting for left anterior descending artery revascularization were randomized to having semiskeletonized (n = 30) or conventional pedicled (n = 30) ITA graft harvested by the same surgeon. Intraoperative transit-time flows were obtained. The DF of the ITA graft at the end of operation was evaluated in two groups. RESULTS: The intraoperative DF was significantly greater in the semiskeletonized grafts than in the pedicled grafts (70.50 ± 14.15 versus 57.6 ± 19.39%; p = 0.005). No statistical difference was observed comparing quantitative pulsatile flow and pulsatile index at the end of the operation in the two groups. However, the free flow of the conduit during the cardiopulmonary bypass before the anastomosis performed was greater in semiskeletonized group than in pedicled group (94 ± 48.37 versus 56.35 ± 34.90 ml/min; p = 0.003). The total operative time was comparable between two groups (p = 0.092). CONCLUSIONS: Semiskeletonized ITA resulted in superior DF of left anterior descending bypass graft flow as compared with pedicled ITA. It is also provide a greater free flow and length of the graft without the long-delayed operative time. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration number (Study ID): TCTR20160913002 Date of registration: September 10, 2016
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5434624
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54346242017-05-18 A randomized comparison of flow characteristics of semiskeletonized and pedicled internal thoracic artery preparations in coronary artery bypass Satdhabudha, Opas Noppawinyoowong, Narupa J Cardiothorac Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Harvesting the internal thoracic artery (ITA) with semiskeletonization is an alternative technique between conventional wide pedicle and skeletonization. It is almost as simple as pedicle harvesting; however, it is supposed to provide the advantage of graft flow and length. Since the heart is unique being the only organ which is perfused during diastole, for comparing the intraoperative graft flow characteristics of semiskeletonization and pedicle technique, we used diastolic filling (DF) using transit-time flow measurement as a primary result. The objective of this study is to compare if semiskeletonized ITA has a greater effect on the intraoperative DF of graft flow versus conventional pedicled ITA in coronary artery bypass. METHODS: Between July 2015 and May 2016, a prospective evaluation of 60 consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting for left anterior descending artery revascularization were randomized to having semiskeletonized (n = 30) or conventional pedicled (n = 30) ITA graft harvested by the same surgeon. Intraoperative transit-time flows were obtained. The DF of the ITA graft at the end of operation was evaluated in two groups. RESULTS: The intraoperative DF was significantly greater in the semiskeletonized grafts than in the pedicled grafts (70.50 ± 14.15 versus 57.6 ± 19.39%; p = 0.005). No statistical difference was observed comparing quantitative pulsatile flow and pulsatile index at the end of the operation in the two groups. However, the free flow of the conduit during the cardiopulmonary bypass before the anastomosis performed was greater in semiskeletonized group than in pedicled group (94 ± 48.37 versus 56.35 ± 34.90 ml/min; p = 0.003). The total operative time was comparable between two groups (p = 0.092). CONCLUSIONS: Semiskeletonized ITA resulted in superior DF of left anterior descending bypass graft flow as compared with pedicled ITA. It is also provide a greater free flow and length of the graft without the long-delayed operative time. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration number (Study ID): TCTR20160913002 Date of registration: September 10, 2016 BioMed Central 2017-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5434624/ /pubmed/28511656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-017-0589-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Satdhabudha, Opas
Noppawinyoowong, Narupa
A randomized comparison of flow characteristics of semiskeletonized and pedicled internal thoracic artery preparations in coronary artery bypass
title A randomized comparison of flow characteristics of semiskeletonized and pedicled internal thoracic artery preparations in coronary artery bypass
title_full A randomized comparison of flow characteristics of semiskeletonized and pedicled internal thoracic artery preparations in coronary artery bypass
title_fullStr A randomized comparison of flow characteristics of semiskeletonized and pedicled internal thoracic artery preparations in coronary artery bypass
title_full_unstemmed A randomized comparison of flow characteristics of semiskeletonized and pedicled internal thoracic artery preparations in coronary artery bypass
title_short A randomized comparison of flow characteristics of semiskeletonized and pedicled internal thoracic artery preparations in coronary artery bypass
title_sort randomized comparison of flow characteristics of semiskeletonized and pedicled internal thoracic artery preparations in coronary artery bypass
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5434624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28511656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-017-0589-1
work_keys_str_mv AT satdhabudhaopas arandomizedcomparisonofflowcharacteristicsofsemiskeletonizedandpedicledinternalthoracicarterypreparationsincoronaryarterybypass
AT noppawinyoowongnarupa arandomizedcomparisonofflowcharacteristicsofsemiskeletonizedandpedicledinternalthoracicarterypreparationsincoronaryarterybypass
AT satdhabudhaopas randomizedcomparisonofflowcharacteristicsofsemiskeletonizedandpedicledinternalthoracicarterypreparationsincoronaryarterybypass
AT noppawinyoowongnarupa randomizedcomparisonofflowcharacteristicsofsemiskeletonizedandpedicledinternalthoracicarterypreparationsincoronaryarterybypass